06/27/2014 | 25m 50s | Video has closed captioning.
USAID & Maternal Health: The agency is spending more money on saving mothers and children. Abortion & Film: "Obvious Child" depicts abortion in a rare light by movie standards. PAST Act: The law the US Humane Society says will stop cruelty against horses. PANEL: Megan Beyer, Nicole Kurokawa Neily, Erica Williams SImon, Holly Hazard
Aired: 06/27/14
>> THIS WEEK ON TO THE >> THIS WEEK ON TO THE CONTRARY... >> THIS WEEK ON TO THE CONTRARY... UP FIRST, PREVENTING CHILD CONTRARY... UP FIRST, PREVENTING CHILD DEATH.
UP FIRST, PREVENTING CHILD DEATH.
THEN, A MEDIA RARITY, A MOVIE DEATH.
THEN, A MEDIA RARITY, A MOVIE ABOUT A SUCCESSFUL ABORTION.
THEN, A MEDIA RARITY, A MOVIE ABOUT A SUCCESSFUL ABORTION.
BEHIND THE HEADLINES, THE HUMANE ABOUT A SUCCESSFUL ABORTION.
BEHIND THE HEADLINES, THE HUMANE SOCIETY WORKS TO END WHAT IT BEHIND THE HEADLINES, THE HUMANE SOCIETY WORKS TO END WHAT IT CALLS A FORM OF HORSE TORTURE.
SOCIETY WORKS TO END WHAT IT CALLS A FORM OF HORSE TORTURE.
>> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT CALLS A FORM OF HORSE TORTURE.
>> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES OF A >> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES OF A TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE.
♪] ♪] HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO ♪] HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO TO THE CONTRARY A DISCUSSION OF HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO TO THE CONTRARY A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM TO THE CONTRARY A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
UP FIRST, SAVING CHILDREN.
DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
UP FIRST, SAVING CHILDREN.
>> THE U.S. AGENCY FOR UP FIRST, SAVING CHILDREN.
>> THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IS >> THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IS PULLING TOGETHER AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IS PULLING TOGETHER AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT ALMOST $3 PULLING TOGETHER AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT ALMOST $3 BILLION TO SAVE HALF A MILLION UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT ALMOST $3 BILLION TO SAVE HALF A MILLION CHILDREN IN IMPOVERISHED BILLION TO SAVE HALF A MILLION CHILDREN IN IMPOVERISHED NATIONS.
CHILDREN IN IMPOVERISHED NATIONS.
6.6 MILLION CHILDREN UNDER THE NATIONS.
6.6 MILLION CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF FIVE DIE EVERY YEAR.
6.6 MILLION CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF FIVE DIE EVERY YEAR.
YEAR.
AGE OF FIVE DIE EVERY YEAR.
YEAR.
MANY OF THOSE DEATHS ARE EASILY YEAR.
MANY OF THOSE DEATHS ARE EASILY PREVENTED.
MANY OF THOSE DEATHS ARE EASILY PREVENTED.
>> WE THINK IF WE CAN GET HEADS PREVENTED.
>> WE THINK IF WE CAN GET HEADS OF STATE AND ENTREPRENEURS >> WE THINK IF WE CAN GET HEADS OF STATE AND ENTREPRENEURS WORKING SIDE-BY-SIDE TO OF STATE AND ENTREPRENEURS WORKING SIDE-BY-SIDE TO ELIMINATE CHILD DEATHS THAT BY WORKING SIDE-BY-SIDE TO ELIMINATE CHILD DEATHS THAT BY 2030 WE COULD LIVE IN A WORLD ELIMINATE CHILD DEATHS THAT BY 2030 WE COULD LIVE IN A WORLD THAT KID DOSE NOT DIE OF SIMPLE 2030 WE COULD LIVE IN A WORLD THAT KID DOSE NOT DIE OF SIMPLE DISEASES.
THAT KID DOSE NOT DIE OF SIMPLE DISEASES.
>> TO EXPAND ITS REACH, USAID IS DISEASES.
>> TO EXPAND ITS REACH, USAID IS WORKING WITH PRIVATE INDUSTRY >> TO EXPAND ITS REACH, USAID IS WORKING WITH PRIVATE INDUSTRY AND NONPROFITS TO REDUCE THE WORKING WITH PRIVATE INDUSTRY AND NONPROFITS TO REDUCE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN ON TAXPAYERS.
AND NONPROFITS TO REDUCE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN ON TAXPAYERS.
>> OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS, OUR FINANCIAL BURDEN ON TAXPAYERS.
>> OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS, OUR PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS ARE >> OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS, OUR PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS ARE UP DRAMATICALLY.
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS ARE UP DRAMATICALLY.
IN FACT, ACROSS USAID OVERALL, UP DRAMATICALLY.
IN FACT, ACROSS USAID OVERALL, ABOUT 9% OF OUR SPENDING USED TO IN FACT, ACROSS USAID OVERALL, ABOUT 9% OF OUR SPENDING USED TO GO INTO PUBLIC PRIVATE ABOUT 9% OF OUR SPENDING USED TO GO INTO PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS.
GO INTO PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS.
TODAY IT'S 45%.
PARTNERSHIPS.
TODAY IT'S 45%.
>> ONE SUCH PARTNER IS EVERY TODAY IT'S 45%.
>> ONE SUCH PARTNER IS EVERY MOTHER COUNTS A NONPROFIT HEADED >> ONE SUCH PARTNER IS EVERY MOTHER COUNTS A NONPROFIT HEADED BY SUPERMODEL AND ADVOCATE MOTHER COUNTS A NONPROFIT HEADED BY SUPERMODEL AND ADVOCATE CHRISTY TURLINGTON.
BY SUPERMODEL AND ADVOCATE CHRISTY TURLINGTON.
>> MATERNAL HEALTH ADVOCATE WHEN CHRISTY TURLINGTON.
>> MATERNAL HEALTH ADVOCATE WHEN I BECAME A MOM ALMOST 11 YEARS >> MATERNAL HEALTH ADVOCATE WHEN I BECAME A MOM ALMOST 11 YEARS WHEN MY DAUGHTER WAS BORN.
I BECAME A MOM ALMOST 11 YEARS WHEN MY DAUGHTER WAS BORN.
AND AFTER SHE WAS BORN, AFTER A WHEN MY DAUGHTER WAS BORN.
AND AFTER SHE WAS BORN, AFTER A VERY GOOD PREGNANCY AND A GREAT AND AFTER SHE WAS BORN, AFTER A VERY GOOD PREGNANCY AND A GREAT DELIVERY, IN FACT, I VERY GOOD PREGNANCY AND A GREAT DELIVERY, IN FACT, I HEMORRHAGED.
DELIVERY, IN FACT, I HEMORRHAGED.
SO THE UNEXPECTED HAPPENED.
HEMORRHAGED.
SO THE UNEXPECTED HAPPENED.
AND IT WAS THAT UNEXPECTED SO THE UNEXPECTED HAPPENED.
AND IT WAS THAT UNEXPECTED EXPERIENCE THAT ILLUMINATED AND IT WAS THAT UNEXPECTED EXPERIENCE THAT ILLUMINATED THERE WAS A GLOBAL TRAGEDY.
EXPERIENCE THAT ILLUMINATED THERE WAS A GLOBAL TRAGEDY.
>> USAID WANTS AMERICANS TO KNOW THERE WAS A GLOBAL TRAGEDY.
>> USAID WANTS AMERICANS TO KNOW IT'S USING THE MONEY >> USAID WANTS AMERICANS TO KNOW IT'S USING THE MONEY EFFICIENTLY.
IT'S USING THE MONEY EFFICIENTLY.
IT RELEASED A REVIEW OF EVERY EFFICIENTLY.
IT RELEASED A REVIEW OF EVERY DOLLAR IT SPENDS TO HELP REDUCE IT RELEASED A REVIEW OF EVERY DOLLAR IT SPENDS TO HELP REDUCE CHILD AND MATERNAL DEATH.
DOLLAR IT SPENDS TO HELP REDUCE CHILD AND MATERNAL DEATH.
ADMINISTRATOR RAJ SHAW SAYS THE CHILD AND MATERNAL DEATH.
ADMINISTRATOR RAJ SHAW SAYS THE AGENCY DRAWS BIPARTISAN SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR RAJ SHAW SAYS THE AGENCY DRAWS BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN CONGRESS.
AGENCY DRAWS BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN CONGRESS.
>> WE HAD 30 MEMBERS OF IN CONGRESS.
>> WE HAD 30 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, REPUBLICAN AND >> WE HAD 30 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT EXTRAORDINARILY CONGRESS, REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT EXTRAORDINARILY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRAT EXTRAORDINARILY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS AND VERY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS COMING CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS AND VERY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS COMING TOGETHER AND SAYING IF AMERICA VERY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS COMING TOGETHER AND SAYING IF AMERICA CAN HELP LEAD THE WORLD TO END TOGETHER AND SAYING IF AMERICA CAN HELP LEAD THE WORLD TO END CHILD DEATH THAT IS THE MORALLY CAN HELP LEAD THE WORLD TO END CHILD DEATH THAT IS THE MORALLY RIGHT THING TO DO AND IT HELPS CHILD DEATH THAT IS THE MORALLY RIGHT THING TO DO AND IT HELPS KEEP US STABLE AND SECURE.
RIGHT THING TO DO AND IT HELPS KEEP US STABLE AND SECURE.
>> SO MEGHAN WILL THIS KEEP US STABLE AND SECURE.
>> SO MEGHAN WILL THIS REALIGNMENT PUTTING TOGETHER THE >> SO MEGHAN WILL THIS REALIGNMENT PUTTING TOGETHER THE $3 BILLION, WILL THIS PRODUCE REALIGNMENT PUTTING TOGETHER THE $3 BILLION, WILL THIS PRODUCE RESULTS?
$3 BILLION, WILL THIS PRODUCE RESULTS?
>> BONNIE I'M SOLD.
RESULTS?
>> BONNIE I'M SOLD.
IT SAVES CHILDREN.
>> BONNIE I'M SOLD.
IT SAVES CHILDREN.
IT'S BIPARTISAN.
IT SAVES CHILDREN.
IT'S BIPARTISAN.
IT'S METRICS BASED, OUT COME IT'S BIPARTISAN.
IT'S METRICS BASED, OUT COME ORIENTED AND TRANSPARENT.
IT'S METRICS BASED, OUT COME ORIENTED AND TRANSPARENT.
WHAT IS NOT TO LIKE?
ORIENTED AND TRANSPARENT.
WHAT IS NOT TO LIKE?
>> BONNIE I'M IN FAVOR OF WHAT IS NOT TO LIKE?
>> BONNIE I'M IN FAVOR OF REVIEWING GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS >> BONNIE I'M IN FAVOR OF REVIEWING GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS AND HOW WE ARE USING THE MONEY REVIEWING GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS AND HOW WE ARE USING THE MONEY AND PUT IT TO THE BEST USE AND HOW WE ARE USING THE MONEY AND PUT IT TO THE BEST USE POSSIBLE.
AND PUT IT TO THE BEST USE POSSIBLE.
>> I AM A FAN OF THE PROGRAM.
POSSIBLE.
>> I AM A FAN OF THE PROGRAM.
A NEW ALIGNMENT OF RESOURCES, >> I AM A FAN OF THE PROGRAM.
A NEW ALIGNMENT OF RESOURCES, PRIVATE AND PUBLIC TOGETHER IS A A NEW ALIGNMENT OF RESOURCES, PRIVATE AND PUBLIC TOGETHER IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC TOGETHER IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
>> I'M OPTIMISTIC IT WILL WORK.
STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
>> I'M OPTIMISTIC IT WILL WORK.
I WISH GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY >> I'M OPTIMISTIC IT WILL WORK.
I WISH GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY WEREN'T SUCH A RARITY.
I WISH GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY WEREN'T SUCH A RARITY.
>> WOULD YOU TELL OTHER PROGRAMS WEREN'T SUCH A RARITY.
>> WOULD YOU TELL OTHER PROGRAMS TO FOLLOW THIS PROGRAM?
>> WOULD YOU TELL OTHER PROGRAMS TO FOLLOW THIS PROGRAM?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
TO FOLLOW THIS PROGRAM?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
I WOULD LOVE FOR THIS TO SUCCEED >> ABSOLUTELY.
I WOULD LOVE FOR THIS TO SUCCEED SO THEY CAN SAY THE REST OF YOU I WOULD LOVE FOR THIS TO SUCCEED SO THEY CAN SAY THE REST OF YOU SHOULD IMPLEMENT THAT.
SO THEY CAN SAY THE REST OF YOU SHOULD IMPLEMENT THAT.
>> I HAVE TO THROW THIS OUT SHOULD IMPLEMENT THAT.
>> I HAVE TO THROW THIS OUT THERE.
>> I HAVE TO THROW THIS OUT THERE.
THE OTHER SIDE, OF COURSE, IS WE THERE.
THE OTHER SIDE, OF COURSE, IS WE HAVE PEOPLE SUFFERING IN THIS THE OTHER SIDE, OF COURSE, IS WE HAVE PEOPLE SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY AND WE ARE NOT OUT OF HAVE PEOPLE SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY AND WE ARE NOT OUT OF THE GREAT RECESSION, COUNTRY AND WE ARE NOT OUT OF THE GREAT RECESSION, UNEMPLOYMENT IS STILL HIGH.
THE GREAT RECESSION, UNEMPLOYMENT IS STILL HIGH.
SHOULD -- UNEMPLOYMENT IS STILL HIGH.
SHOULD -- IF YOU WERE IN AN INNER-CITY SHOULD -- IF YOU WERE IN AN INNER-CITY WITH AN UNWED MOTHER WITH TWO IF YOU WERE IN AN INNER-CITY WITH AN UNWED MOTHER WITH TWO HUNGRY CHILDREN HOW WOULD YOU WITH AN UNWED MOTHER WITH TWO HUNGRY CHILDREN HOW WOULD YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS?
HUNGRY CHILDREN HOW WOULD YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS?
>> I WORK ON DOMESTIC ISSUES FEEL ABOUT THIS?
>> I WORK ON DOMESTIC ISSUES THAT ARE URGENT AND PRESSING AND >> I WORK ON DOMESTIC ISSUES THAT ARE URGENT AND PRESSING AND YET STILL UNDERSTAND THE THAT ARE URGENT AND PRESSING AND YET STILL UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE IN ADDRESSING GLOBAL YET STILL UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE IN ADDRESSING GLOBAL POVERTY.
IMPORTANCE IN ADDRESSING GLOBAL POVERTY.
IT'S VERY MUCH ABOUT NATIONAL POVERTY.
IT'S VERY MUCH ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY.
IT'S VERY MUCH ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY.
WE UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH SHOWS SECURITY.
WE UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THE INSECURITY AND WE UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THE INSECURITY AND INSTABILITY ABROAD IMPACTS THE THAT THE INSECURITY AND INSTABILITY ABROAD IMPACTS THE AMOUNT OF NATIONAL SECURITY INSTABILITY ABROAD IMPACTS THE AMOUNT OF NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS WE FACE AT HOME.
AMOUNT OF NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS WE FACE AT HOME.
THERE IS A MORAL PART BUT IT'S THREATS WE FACE AT HOME.
THERE IS A MORAL PART BUT IT'S ALSO SELF-INTERESTED.
THERE IS A MORAL PART BUT IT'S ALSO SELF-INTERESTED.
>> AND HONESTLY IF WE ARE GOING ALSO SELF-INTERESTED.
>> AND HONESTLY IF WE ARE GOING TO ADDRESS DOMESTIC ISSUES I >> AND HONESTLY IF WE ARE GOING TO ADDRESS DOMESTIC ISSUES I WOULD LOVE TO SEE US REDIRECT TO ADDRESS DOMESTIC ISSUES I WOULD LOVE TO SEE US REDIRECT SOME OF OUR MONEY AWAY FROM THE WOULD LOVE TO SEE US REDIRECT SOME OF OUR MONEY AWAY FROM THE DRONE DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN SOME OF OUR MONEY AWAY FROM THE DRONE DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN NATION BUILDING ADVENTURES DRONE DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN NATION BUILDING ADVENTURES OVERSEAS.
NATION BUILDING ADVENTURES OVERSEAS.
>> AND LET ME RESPOND TO MY OWN OVERSEAS.
>> AND LET ME RESPOND TO MY OWN QUESTION.
>> AND LET ME RESPOND TO MY OWN QUESTION.
I WAS IN MOROCCO YEARS AGO QUESTION.
I WAS IN MOROCCO YEARS AGO REPORTING OUTUSAID MONEY WAS I WAS IN MOROCCO YEARS AGO REPORTING OUTUSAID MONEY WAS BEING SPENT THERE AND TALKED TO REPORTING OUTUSAID MONEY WAS BEING SPENT THERE AND TALKED TO ONE OF THE COUNTRY REPS FOR BEING SPENT THERE AND TALKED TO ONE OF THE COUNTRY REPS FOR MOROCCO AND HE WAS TELLING ME ONE OF THE COUNTRY REPS FOR MOROCCO AND HE WAS TELLING ME THAT THE U.S. CELLULAR COMPANY MOROCCO AND HE WAS TELLING ME THAT THE U.S. CELLULAR COMPANY IN THE EARLY DAYS OF CELL TOWERS THAT THE U.S. CELLULAR COMPANY IN THE EARLY DAYS OF CELL TOWERS ESPECIALLY OVERSEAS HAD LOST A IN THE EARLY DAYS OF CELL TOWERS ESPECIALLY OVERSEAS HAD LOST A HUGE CONTRACT TO FRANCE BECAUSE ESPECIALLY OVERSEAS HAD LOST A HUGE CONTRACT TO FRANCE BECAUSE FRANCE GAVE A LOT MORE AID MONEY HUGE CONTRACT TO FRANCE BECAUSE FRANCE GAVE A LOT MORE AID MONEY TO MOROCCO THAN THE U.S. DID.
FRANCE GAVE A LOT MORE AID MONEY TO MOROCCO THAN THE U.S. DID.
SO YOU COMING FROM A CORPORATE TO MOROCCO THAN THE U.S. DID.
SO YOU COMING FROM A CORPORATE PERSPECTIVE -- SO YOU COMING FROM A CORPORATE PERSPECTIVE -- >> THIS IS THE OLDEST CONTINENT.
PERSPECTIVE -- >> THIS IS THE OLDEST CONTINENT.
IT IS ALSO AN EMERGING ECONOMY >> THIS IS THE OLDEST CONTINENT.
IT IS ALSO AN EMERGING ECONOMY AND WE NEED TO LOOK AT AFRICA IT IS ALSO AN EMERGING ECONOMY AND WE NEED TO LOOK AT AFRICA THAT WAY.
AND WE NEED TO LOOK AT AFRICA THAT WAY.
IT'S NO ACCIDENT THAT CHINA IS THAT WAY.
IT'S NO ACCIDENT THAT CHINA IS IN AFRICA ALL OVER THE PLACE IT'S NO ACCIDENT THAT CHINA IS IN AFRICA ALL OVER THE PLACE BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE, ROADS, IN AFRICA ALL OVER THE PLACE BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE, ROADS, WATER, THEY ARE DEFINITELY BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE, ROADS, WATER, THEY ARE DEFINITELY LOOKING FORWARD TO BRINGING WATER, THEY ARE DEFINITELY LOOKING FORWARD TO BRINGING AFRICA OUT OF THE THIRD WORLD LOOKING FORWARD TO BRINGING AFRICA OUT OF THE THIRD WORLD INTO THE FIRST WORLD WHEN THEY AFRICA OUT OF THE THIRD WORLD INTO THE FIRST WORLD WHEN THEY WILL BECOME A MARKET.
INTO THE FIRST WORLD WHEN THEY WILL BECOME A MARKET.
BUT I STILL LIKE TO GO BACK TO WILL BECOME A MARKET.
BUT I STILL LIKE TO GO BACK TO THE IDEA THAT IT'S MORAL BUT I STILL LIKE TO GO BACK TO THE IDEA THAT IT'S MORAL AUTHORITY.
THE IDEA THAT IT'S MORAL AUTHORITY.
THE PIECE OF OUR PUBLIC IMAGE AUTHORITY.
THE PIECE OF OUR PUBLIC IMAGE THAT THE WORLD STILL UNDERSTANDS THE PIECE OF OUR PUBLIC IMAGE THAT THE WORLD STILL UNDERSTANDS AND CONNECTS WITH IS THAT THE THAT THE WORLD STILL UNDERSTANDS AND CONNECTS WITH IS THAT THE AMERICANS COME IN AND HELP AND CONNECTS WITH IS THAT THE AMERICANS COME IN AND HELP PEOPLE.
AMERICANS COME IN AND HELP PEOPLE.
AND THIS IS GREAT FOR THAT PEOPLE.
AND THIS IS GREAT FOR THAT BRANDING AND HELPS US WORLDWIDE AND THIS IS GREAT FOR THAT BRANDING AND HELPS US WORLDWIDE IN THAT WAY.
BRANDING AND HELPS US WORLDWIDE IN THAT WAY.
AND IT HELPS US IN THE GLOBAL IN THAT WAY.
AND IT HELPS US IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY THAT WAY.
AND IT HELPS US IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY THAT WAY.
>> IT'S TRUE WE SHOULD BE ECONOMY THAT WAY.
>> IT'S TRUE WE SHOULD BE PROVIDING HUMANITARIAN AID TO >> IT'S TRUE WE SHOULD BE PROVIDING HUMANITARIAN AID TO WHICHEVER COUNTRIES WE CAN.
PROVIDING HUMANITARIAN AID TO WHICHEVER COUNTRIES WE CAN.
BUT I THINK TO YOUR POINT, YOU WHICHEVER COUNTRIES WE CAN.
BUT I THINK TO YOUR POINT, YOU KNOW, IT DOES MAKE SENSE TO GO BUT I THINK TO YOUR POINT, YOU KNOW, IT DOES MAKE SENSE TO GO INTO COUNTRIES AND HELP THEM GET KNOW, IT DOES MAKE SENSE TO GO INTO COUNTRIES AND HELP THEM GET ON TRACK ECONOMICALLY BECAUSE WE INTO COUNTRIES AND HELP THEM GET ON TRACK ECONOMICALLY BECAUSE WE ARE BUILDING BUSINESS PARTNERS ON TRACK ECONOMICALLY BECAUSE WE ARE BUILDING BUSINESS PARTNERS FOR THE POINT.
ARE BUILDING BUSINESS PARTNERS FOR THE POINT.
>> AND THE REASON I RAISED IT FOR THE POINT.
>> AND THE REASON I RAISED IT YOU NEVER SEE IT MADE.
>> AND THE REASON I RAISED IT YOU NEVER SEE IT MADE.
I ASKED ADMINISTRATOR SHAW ABOUT YOU NEVER SEE IT MADE.
I ASKED ADMINISTRATOR SHAW ABOUT THAT AND IT'S NOT A POINT THAT I I ASKED ADMINISTRATOR SHAW ABOUT THAT AND IT'S NOT A POINT THAT I ASKED HIM THE QUESTION WHAT ARE THAT AND IT'S NOT A POINT THAT I ASKED HIM THE QUESTION WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS THAT AMERICANS ASKED HIM THE QUESTION WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS THAT AMERICANS DON'T SEE, AND ASKED HIM TO THE BENEFITS THAT AMERICANS DON'T SEE, AND ASKED HIM TO POINT THIS OUT.
DON'T SEE, AND ASKED HIM TO POINT THIS OUT.
>> PART OF IT IS BECAUSE IT POINT THIS OUT.
>> PART OF IT IS BECAUSE IT SOUNDS INSENSITIVE.
>> PART OF IT IS BECAUSE IT SOUNDS INSENSITIVE.
WE SHOULD GO HERE BECAUSE WE CAN SOUNDS INSENSITIVE.
WE SHOULD GO HERE BECAUSE WE CAN GET MONEY OUT OF THEM IN THE WE SHOULD GO HERE BECAUSE WE CAN GET MONEY OUT OF THEM IN THE FUTURE.
GET MONEY OUT OF THEM IN THE FUTURE.
THAT DOESN'T SOUND POLITE.
FUTURE.
THAT DOESN'T SOUND POLITE.
>> YOU CAN RAISE AWARENESS AMONG THAT DOESN'T SOUND POLITE.
>> YOU CAN RAISE AWARENESS AMONG AMERICANS THAT THERE ARE >> YOU CAN RAISE AWARENESS AMONG AMERICANS THAT THERE ARE BENEFITS YOU WOULDN'T THINK OF AMERICANS THAT THERE ARE BENEFITS YOU WOULDN'T THINK OF NORMALLY IN THESE SITUATIONS.
BENEFITS YOU WOULDN'T THINK OF NORMALLY IN THESE SITUATIONS.
>> WHAT I'M INTERESTED IN AND I NORMALLY IN THESE SITUATIONS.
>> WHAT I'M INTERESTED IN AND I OPEN UP SAYING I THINK IT IS A >> WHAT I'M INTERESTED IN AND I OPEN UP SAYING I THINK IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM.
OPEN UP SAYING I THINK IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM.
I WANT TO SEE HOW IT'S FANTASTIC PROGRAM.
I WANT TO SEE HOW IT'S IMPLEMENTED ON THE GROUND.
I WANT TO SEE HOW IT'S IMPLEMENTED ON THE GROUND.
WHILE IT HELPS THE AMERICAN IMPLEMENTED ON THE GROUND.
WHILE IT HELPS THE AMERICAN BRAND OF HELPING I AM NOT THE WHILE IT HELPS THE AMERICAN BRAND OF HELPING I AM NOT THE FAN OF THE AMERICAN SAVIOUR BRAND OF HELPING I AM NOT THE FAN OF THE AMERICAN SAVIOUR BRAND OF PARACHUTING INTO A FAN OF THE AMERICAN SAVIOUR BRAND OF PARACHUTING INTO A THRIVING COUNTRY AND DIFFERENT BRAND OF PARACHUTING INTO A THRIVING COUNTRY AND DIFFERENT METRICS AND COMING AND SAYING WE THRIVING COUNTRY AND DIFFERENT METRICS AND COMING AND SAYING WE KNOW WHAT IS BEST HERE WE ARE.
METRICS AND COMING AND SAYING WE KNOW WHAT IS BEST HERE WE ARE.
I THINK IT IS A FANTASTIC KNOW WHAT IS BEST HERE WE ARE.
I THINK IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM.
I THINK IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM.
THE INFLUX OF RESOURCE ALSO HELP PROGRAM.
THE INFLUX OF RESOURCE ALSO HELP BUT I THINK IT HAS TO BE DONE THE INFLUX OF RESOURCE ALSO HELP BUT I THINK IT HAS TO BE DONE PROPERLY AND RESPECTFULLY.
BUT I THINK IT HAS TO BE DONE PROPERLY AND RESPECTFULLY.
>> LOOK AT THE DIVIDENDS OF THE PROPERLY AND RESPECTFULLY.
>> LOOK AT THE DIVIDENDS OF THE MARSHALL PLAN IN EUROPE.
>> LOOK AT THE DIVIDENDS OF THE MARSHALL PLAN IN EUROPE.
FOR MANY YEARS, THE FACT WE MARSHALL PLAN IN EUROPE.
FOR MANY YEARS, THE FACT WE HELPED TO BUILD THEIR ECONOMY FOR MANY YEARS, THE FACT WE HELPED TO BUILD THEIR ECONOMY CAME BACK TO US MANY TIMES OVER.
HELPED TO BUILD THEIR ECONOMY CAME BACK TO US MANY TIMES OVER.
>> I'M EXCITED ABOUT THE PUBLIC CAME BACK TO US MANY TIMES OVER.
>> I'M EXCITED ABOUT THE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ASPECT WHERE >> I'M EXCITED ABOUT THE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ASPECT WHERE WE ARE NOT HAVING GOVERNMENT PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ASPECT WHERE WE ARE NOT HAVING GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS REINVENT THE WHEEL.
WE ARE NOT HAVING GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS REINVENT THE WHEEL.
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO KNOW HOW TO BUREAUCRATS REINVENT THE WHEEL.
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS TO MARKET AND WHO THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS TO MARKET AND WHO UNDERSTAND THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT GET THINGS TO MARKET AND WHO UNDERSTAND THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT ON THE GROUND.
UNDERSTAND THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT ON THE GROUND.
IT'S NOT JUST SOME WELL MEANING ON THE GROUND.
IT'S NOT JUST SOME WELL MEANING 26-YEAR-OLD WORKING WITH A IT'S NOT JUST SOME WELL MEANING 26-YEAR-OLD WORKING WITH A FOREIGN AID ORGANIZATION.
26-YEAR-OLD WORKING WITH A FOREIGN AID ORGANIZATION.
THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT GET WHAT FOREIGN AID ORGANIZATION.
THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT GET WHAT IS GOING ON.
THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT GET WHAT IS GOING ON.
>> AND THE COMPANIES DESERVE IS GOING ON.
>> AND THE COMPANIES DESERVE CREDIT, COCA-COLA, JOHNSON & >> AND THE COMPANIES DESERVE CREDIT, COCA-COLA, JOHNSON & JOHNSON.
CREDIT, COCA-COLA, JOHNSON & JOHNSON.
COCA-COLA SAYS USE OUR SUPPLY JOHNSON.
COCA-COLA SAYS USE OUR SUPPLY CHAIN EVERYBODY GETS A COKE COCA-COLA SAYS USE OUR SUPPLY CHAIN EVERYBODY GETS A COKE EVERYWHERE.
CHAIN EVERYBODY GETS A COKE EVERYWHERE.
>> ALL THE VILLAGES IN THE EVERYWHERE.
>> ALL THE VILLAGES IN THE WORLD.
>> ALL THE VILLAGES IN THE WORLD.
>> AND THERE IS I'VE WORKED WITH WORLD.
>> AND THERE IS I'VE WORKED WITH THESE COMPANIES AND PARTICULAR >> AND THERE IS I'VE WORKED WITH THESE COMPANIES AND PARTICULAR COCA-COLA AND THERE IS A THESE COMPANIES AND PARTICULAR COCA-COLA AND THERE IS A SELF-INTEREST THERE AS WELL.
COCA-COLA AND THERE IS A SELF-INTEREST THERE AS WELL.
BUT IT SAVES LIVES.
SELF-INTEREST THERE AS WELL.
BUT IT SAVES LIVES.
>> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
BUT IT SAVES LIVES.
>> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER >> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.
>> FROM CHILDBIRTH TO ABORTION.
@BONNIEERBE.
>> FROM CHILDBIRTH TO ABORTION.
>> A NEW MOVIE OBVIOUS CHILD IS >> FROM CHILDBIRTH TO ABORTION.
>> A NEW MOVIE OBVIOUS CHILD IS THE FIRST IN 30 YEARS IN WHICH >> A NEW MOVIE OBVIOUS CHILD IS THE FIRST IN 30 YEARS IN WHICH THE FEMALE LEAD BECOMES THE FIRST IN 30 YEARS IN WHICH THE FEMALE LEAD BECOMES UNEXPECTEDLY PREGNANT, HAS AN THE FEMALE LEAD BECOMES UNEXPECTEDLY PREGNANT, HAS AN ABORTION IS FINE WITH HER UNEXPECTEDLY PREGNANT, HAS AN ABORTION IS FINE WITH HER DECISION.
ABORTION IS FINE WITH HER DECISION.
ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
DECISION.
ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
MOVIE AND TV PORTRAYALS OF ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
MOVIE AND TV PORTRAYALS OF UNPLANNED PREGNANCIES END WITH MOVIE AND TV PORTRAYALS OF UNPLANNED PREGNANCIES END WITH THE WOMAN HAPPILY HAVING THE UNPLANNED PREGNANCIES END WITH THE WOMAN HAPPILY HAVING THE BABY AS IN KNOCKED UP OR THE WOMAN HAPPILY HAVING THE BABY AS IN KNOCKED UP OR MISCARRYING OR HAVING AN BABY AS IN KNOCKED UP OR MISCARRYING OR HAVING AN ABORTION AND DYING AS IN MISCARRYING OR HAVING AN ABORTION AND DYING AS IN REVOLUTIONARY ROAD.
ABORTION AND DYING AS IN REVOLUTIONARY ROAD.
THE LAST TIME A MAJOR MOTION REVOLUTIONARY ROAD.
THE LAST TIME A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE PORTRAYED A SUCCESSFUL THE LAST TIME A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE PORTRAYED A SUCCESSFUL ABORTION WAS IN 1982 IN FAST PICTURE PORTRAYED A SUCCESSFUL ABORTION WAS IN 1982 IN FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH.
ABORTION WAS IN 1982 IN FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH.
AND THE FEMALE DIRECTOR OF THAT TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH.
AND THE FEMALE DIRECTOR OF THAT FILM TOLD SLATE MAGAZINE SHE AND THE FEMALE DIRECTOR OF THAT FILM TOLD SLATE MAGAZINE SHE DIDN'T THINK SHE COULD GET AWAY FILM TOLD SLATE MAGAZINE SHE DIDN'T THINK SHE COULD GET AWAY WITH THAT TODAY.
DIDN'T THINK SHE COULD GET AWAY WITH THAT TODAY.
>> SO 1982 AND I SAW A MOVIE WITH THAT TODAY.
>> SO 1982 AND I SAW A MOVIE THAT CAME OUT A FEW MONTHS AGO >> SO 1982 AND I SAW A MOVIE THAT CAME OUT A FEW MONTHS AGO ABOUT A YOUNG WOMAN SINGLE MOM, THAT CAME OUT A FEW MONTHS AGO ABOUT A YOUNG WOMAN SINGLE MOM, DAUGHTER OF A SINGLE MOM HAVING ABOUT A YOUNG WOMAN SINGLE MOM, DAUGHTER OF A SINGLE MOM HAVING ALL KINDS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND DAUGHTER OF A SINGLE MOM HAVING ALL KINDS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AND WENT TO ALL KINDS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AND WENT TO HER CHURCH AND GOT TALKED INTO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AND WENT TO HER CHURCH AND GOT TALKED INTO KEEPING THE BABY.
HER CHURCH AND GOT TALKED INTO KEEPING THE BABY.
AND I REMEMBER THINKING IT SEEMS KEEPING THE BABY.
AND I REMEMBER THINKING IT SEEMS SO OUT OF DATE.
AND I REMEMBER THINKING IT SEEMS SO OUT OF DATE.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
SO OUT OF DATE.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
>> WELL, YOU ARE FORGETTING JUNO WHAT IS GOING ON?
>> WELL, YOU ARE FORGETTING JUNO THAT CAME OUT TO SPEAK TO YOUR >> WELL, YOU ARE FORGETTING JUNO THAT CAME OUT TO SPEAK TO YOUR FIRST POINT IT WAS A POPULAR THAT CAME OUT TO SPEAK TO YOUR FIRST POINT IT WAS A POPULAR MOVIE AND SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE FIRST POINT IT WAS A POPULAR MOVIE AND SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE ABORTION.
MOVIE AND SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE ABORTION.
TO SPEAK TO THE ORIGINAL POINT, ABORTION.
TO SPEAK TO THE ORIGINAL POINT, I THINK THE THING IS THAT EVERY TO SPEAK TO THE ORIGINAL POINT, I THINK THE THING IS THAT EVERY SIDE OF THIS DEBATE WANTS TO SAY I THINK THE THING IS THAT EVERY SIDE OF THIS DEBATE WANTS TO SAY OUR SIDE IS WINNING THE SIDE OF THIS DEBATE WANTS TO SAY OUR SIDE IS WINNING THE OPPONENTS AND THE PROPONENTS DO OUR SIDE IS WINNING THE OPPONENTS AND THE PROPONENTS DO BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, OPPONENTS AND THE PROPONENTS DO BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, YOU KNOW AMERICANS ARE STILL BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, YOU KNOW AMERICANS ARE STILL DIVIDED ON THE ISSUE OF YOU KNOW AMERICANS ARE STILL DIVIDED ON THE ISSUE OF ABORTION.
DIVIDED ON THE ISSUE OF ABORTION.
BILL CLINTON'S FAMOUS SAYING 20 ABORTION.
BILL CLINTON'S FAMOUS SAYING 20 YEARS AGO NOW THAT ABORTION BILL CLINTON'S FAMOUS SAYING 20 YEARS AGO NOW THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE SAFE, LEGAL AND RARE YEARS AGO NOW THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE SAFE, LEGAL AND RARE STICKS FOR MOST AMERICANS.
SHOULD BE SAFE, LEGAL AND RARE STICKS FOR MOST AMERICANS.
AND I THINK THAT IN THE CASE OF STICKS FOR MOST AMERICANS.
AND I THINK THAT IN THE CASE OF THIS MOVIE, IT WAS NBC ALMOST -- AND I THINK THAT IN THE CASE OF THIS MOVIE, IT WAS NBC ALMOST -- ORIGINALLY DID NOT WANT TO SHOW THIS MOVIE, IT WAS NBC ALMOST -- ORIGINALLY DID NOT WANT TO SHOW THE PREVIEWS.
ORIGINALLY DID NOT WANT TO SHOW THE PREVIEWS.
AND THAT IS WHY.
THE PREVIEWS.
AND THAT IS WHY.
IS BECAUSE SO MANY AMERICANS ARE AND THAT IS WHY.
IS BECAUSE SO MANY AMERICANS ARE STILL DIVIDED ON THIS ISSUE.
IS BECAUSE SO MANY AMERICANS ARE STILL DIVIDED ON THIS ISSUE.
>> YOU KNOW WHEN THAT HAPPENED, STILL DIVIDED ON THIS ISSUE.
>> YOU KNOW WHEN THAT HAPPENED, WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THE NEW >> YOU KNOW WHEN THAT HAPPENED, WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THE NEW GENERATION AND ALL THE SOCIAL WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THE NEW GENERATION AND ALL THE SOCIAL MEDIA STUFF IS THAT YOU GET AN GENERATION AND ALL THE SOCIAL MEDIA STUFF IS THAT YOU GET AN IMMEDIATE REACTION TO A DECISION MEDIA STUFF IS THAT YOU GET AN IMMEDIATE REACTION TO A DECISION YOU HAVE MADE CORPORATELY ON A IMMEDIATE REACTION TO A DECISION YOU HAVE MADE CORPORATELY ON A TOPIC PEOPLE FEEL STRONGLY YOU HAVE MADE CORPORATELY ON A TOPIC PEOPLE FEEL STRONGLY ABOUT.
TOPIC PEOPLE FEEL STRONGLY ABOUT.
YOU SAW IT NBC WAS BACKTRACKING ABOUT.
YOU SAW IT NBC WAS BACKTRACKING AND NOW RUNNING COMMERCIALS ON YOU SAW IT NBC WAS BACKTRACKING AND NOW RUNNING COMMERCIALS ON THIS MOVIE THAT DO REFERENCE AND NOW RUNNING COMMERCIALS ON THIS MOVIE THAT DO REFERENCE ABORTION.
THIS MOVIE THAT DO REFERENCE ABORTION.
AND WE'VE SEEN THAT WHILE ABORTION.
AND WE'VE SEEN THAT WHILE PERHAPS FILM HAS NOT BEEN AND WE'VE SEEN THAT WHILE PERHAPS FILM HAS NOT BEEN REPRESENTING THIS CHOICE THE PERHAPS FILM HAS NOT BEEN REPRESENTING THIS CHOICE THE PREGNANCY CHOICE MUCH.
REPRESENTING THIS CHOICE THE PREGNANCY CHOICE MUCH.
WHAT YOU SEE IN SOCIAL MEDIA IS PREGNANCY CHOICE MUCH.
WHAT YOU SEE IN SOCIAL MEDIA IS THAT THEY ARE FULLY ENGAGED IN WHAT YOU SEE IN SOCIAL MEDIA IS THAT THEY ARE FULLY ENGAGED IN ALL KINDS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH THAT THEY ARE FULLY ENGAGED IN ALL KINDS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ISSUES.
ALL KINDS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ISSUES.
AND WHEN A COMPANY OR A POLICY ISSUES.
AND WHEN A COMPANY OR A POLICY OR ISSUE COMES UP IT LIGHTS UP AND WHEN A COMPANY OR A POLICY OR ISSUE COMES UP IT LIGHTS UP THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
OR ISSUE COMES UP IT LIGHTS UP THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
AND I PREDICT THAT THAT IS GOING THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
AND I PREDICT THAT THAT IS GOING TO CHANGE WHAT COMPANIES DO, I AND I PREDICT THAT THAT IS GOING TO CHANGE WHAT COMPANIES DO, I THINK IT MIGHT CHANGE WHAT TO CHANGE WHAT COMPANIES DO, I THINK IT MIGHT CHANGE WHAT HOLLYWOOD DOES.
THINK IT MIGHT CHANGE WHAT HOLLYWOOD DOES.
THERE WAS A STUDY DONE BY THE HOLLYWOOD DOES.
THERE WAS A STUDY DONE BY THE JOURNAL CONTRACEPTION AND IT THERE WAS A STUDY DONE BY THE JOURNAL CONTRACEPTION AND IT SHOWED THAT NEGATIVE MYTHS AND JOURNAL CONTRACEPTION AND IT SHOWED THAT NEGATIVE MYTHS AND CULTURALLY NEGATIVE IDEAS ABOUT SHOWED THAT NEGATIVE MYTHS AND CULTURALLY NEGATIVE IDEAS ABOUT ABORTION THAT ARE NOT FACTUALLY CULTURALLY NEGATIVE IDEAS ABOUT ABORTION THAT ARE NOT FACTUALLY TRUE ARE PERPETUATED IN FILM.
ABORTION THAT ARE NOT FACTUALLY TRUE ARE PERPETUATED IN FILM.
AND I THINK THAT MAY CHANGE TRUE ARE PERPETUATED IN FILM.
AND I THINK THAT MAY CHANGE BECAUSE OF THE RESPONSIVENESS IN AND I THINK THAT MAY CHANGE BECAUSE OF THE RESPONSIVENESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA.
BECAUSE OF THE RESPONSIVENESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA.
>> HOLLYWOOD IS ALWAYS BEING SOCIAL MEDIA.
>> HOLLYWOOD IS ALWAYS BEING ACCUSED OF BEING SO LIBERAL.
>> HOLLYWOOD IS ALWAYS BEING ACCUSED OF BEING SO LIBERAL.
I'M NOT SURE IT IS LIBERAL AS ACCUSED OF BEING SO LIBERAL.
I'M NOT SURE IT IS LIBERAL AS MUCH AS IT IS CORPORATE.
I'M NOT SURE IT IS LIBERAL AS MUCH AS IT IS CORPORATE.
IT'S ABOUT MONEY, LET'S FACE IT.
MUCH AS IT IS CORPORATE.
IT'S ABOUT MONEY, LET'S FACE IT.
WHY IS HOLLYWOOD SO BEHIND THE IT'S ABOUT MONEY, LET'S FACE IT.
WHY IS HOLLYWOOD SO BEHIND THE TIMES IN TERMS OF YOU CAN SHOW WHY IS HOLLYWOOD SO BEHIND THE TIMES IN TERMS OF YOU CAN SHOW WAR, YOU CAN SHOW PEOPLE'S HEADS TIMES IN TERMS OF YOU CAN SHOW WAR, YOU CAN SHOW PEOPLE'S HEADS BEING BLOWN OFF YOU CANNOT TALK WAR, YOU CAN SHOW PEOPLE'S HEADS BEING BLOWN OFF YOU CANNOT TALK ABOUT A WOMAN HAVING AN ABORTION BEING BLOWN OFF YOU CANNOT TALK ABOUT A WOMAN HAVING AN ABORTION SHE WANTS AND IS HAPPY ABOUT ABOUT A WOMAN HAVING AN ABORTION SHE WANTS AND IS HAPPY ABOUT HAVING?
SHE WANTS AND IS HAPPY ABOUT HAVING?
>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAVING?
>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED ME FOR YEARS.
>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED ME FOR YEARS.
I WAS INTEREST SOD READ THE BOTHERED ME FOR YEARS.
I WAS INTEREST SOD READ THE STATISTICS ABOUT HOW THE I WAS INTEREST SOD READ THE STATISTICS ABOUT HOW THE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN IN FILM AND STATISTICS ABOUT HOW THE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN IN FILM AND TV THAT ARE PORTRAYED AS DYING PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN IN FILM AND TV THAT ARE PORTRAYED AS DYING AS A RESULT OF THIS.
TV THAT ARE PORTRAYED AS DYING AS A RESULT OF THIS.
>> 18% IN THE 300 MOVIES THAT AS A RESULT OF THIS.
>> 18% IN THE 300 MOVIES THAT THIS STUDY LOOKED AT IT WAS 15% >> 18% IN THE 300 MOVIES THAT THIS STUDY LOOKED AT IT WAS 15% DIED.
THIS STUDY LOOKED AT IT WAS 15% DIED.
>> LESS THAN .01%.
DIED.
>> LESS THAN .01%.
>> BUT THEN LOOKING AT STUDIES >> LESS THAN .01%.
>> BUT THEN LOOKING AT STUDIES BY THE ORGANIZATIONS WHO ARE THE >> BUT THEN LOOKING AT STUDIES BY THE ORGANIZATIONS WHO ARE THE WOMEN MAKING THESE DECISIONS?
BY THE ORGANIZATIONS WHO ARE THE WOMEN MAKING THESE DECISIONS?
THESE ARE NOT SINGLE WOMEN IN WOMEN MAKING THESE DECISIONS?
THESE ARE NOT SINGLE WOMEN IN THE INNER-CITIES THESE ARE OFTEN THESE ARE NOT SINGLE WOMEN IN THE INNER-CITIES THESE ARE OFTEN MARRIED, ODDER WOMEN.
THE INNER-CITIES THESE ARE OFTEN MARRIED, ODDER WOMEN.
I'M OPTIMISTIC HOLLYWOOD WILL MARRIED, ODDER WOMEN.
I'M OPTIMISTIC HOLLYWOOD WILL CATCH UP TO REALITY.
I'M OPTIMISTIC HOLLYWOOD WILL CATCH UP TO REALITY.
>> IT IS ABOUT HOLLYWOOD FILM CATCH UP TO REALITY.
>> IT IS ABOUT HOLLYWOOD FILM ART CULTURE REFLECTING THE >> IT IS ABOUT HOLLYWOOD FILM ART CULTURE REFLECTING THE TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES AND ART CULTURE REFLECTING THE TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES AND HOLLYWOOD IS FAR FROM LIBERAL TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES AND HOLLYWOOD IS FAR FROM LIBERAL WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PERCENTAGE HOLLYWOOD IS FAR FROM LIBERAL WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN DIRECTORS, AND WRITERS WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN DIRECTORS, AND WRITERS AND THE CHARACTERS WOMEN PORTRAY OF WOMEN DIRECTORS, AND WRITERS AND THE CHARACTERS WOMEN PORTRAY HOLLYWOOD IS NOT LIBERAL.
AND THE CHARACTERS WOMEN PORTRAY HOLLYWOOD IS NOT LIBERAL.
>> GINA IS DOING A GLOBAL STUDY HOLLYWOOD IS NOT LIBERAL.
>> GINA IS DOING A GLOBAL STUDY LOOKING AT FILM FROM OTHER >> GINA IS DOING A GLOBAL STUDY LOOKING AT FILM FROM OTHER CULTURES.
LOOKING AT FILM FROM OTHER CULTURES.
SHE HAS DONE THE WORK ON WHAT CULTURES.
SHE HAS DONE THE WORK ON WHAT HAPPENED IN THE U.S SHE HAS DONE THE WORK ON WHAT HAPPENED IN THE U.S AND HOW WOMEN ARE BARELY HAPPENED IN THE U.S AND HOW WOMEN ARE BARELY RECOGNIZED EVEN IN A GROUP SHOT.
AND HOW WOMEN ARE BARELY RECOGNIZED EVEN IN A GROUP SHOT.
IF YOU SEE A WIDE SHOT WITH A RECOGNIZED EVEN IN A GROUP SHOT.
IF YOU SEE A WIDE SHOT WITH A CROWD, THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF IF YOU SEE A WIDE SHOT WITH A CROWD, THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN A CROWD SHOT IN THE CROWD, THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN A CROWD SHOT IN THE U.S. MOVIE IS 17%.
WOMEN IN A CROWD SHOT IN THE U.S. MOVIE IS 17%.
SO YOU WONDER WHY WE HAVE 17% U.S. MOVIE IS 17%.
SO YOU WONDER WHY WE HAVE 17% ONBOARD THEY THINK THAT IS HALF.
SO YOU WONDER WHY WE HAVE 17% ONBOARD THEY THINK THAT IS HALF.
>> HOW IS IT EVEN IN 1956, THE ONBOARD THEY THINK THAT IS HALF.
>> HOW IS IT EVEN IN 1956, THE PREDECESSOR TO THE MPAA, THE >> HOW IS IT EVEN IN 1956, THE PREDECESSOR TO THE MPAA, THE MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION PREDECESSOR TO THE MPAA, THE MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION RATINGS SYSTEM EVEN MENTIONED MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION RATINGS SYSTEM EVEN MENTIONED THAT MOVIES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO RATINGS SYSTEM EVEN MENTIONED THAT MOVIES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO MENTION ABORTION AT ALL.
THAT MOVIES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO MENTION ABORTION AT ALL.
AND IF THEY DID SHOW THEM THEY MENTION ABORTION AT ALL.
AND IF THEY DID SHOW THEM THEY SHOULD SHOW THEM AS TRAGEDIES.
AND IF THEY DID SHOW THEM THEY SHOULD SHOW THEM AS TRAGEDIES.
>> AT THAT TIME IT DID REFLECT SHOULD SHOW THEM AS TRAGEDIES.
>> AT THAT TIME IT DID REFLECT REALITY BECAUSE ABORTION WAS >> AT THAT TIME IT DID REFLECT REALITY BECAUSE ABORTION WAS ILLEGAL.
REALITY BECAUSE ABORTION WAS ILLEGAL.
SO I MEAN ONE WOULD -- ILLEGAL.
SO I MEAN ONE WOULD -- AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
SO I MEAN ONE WOULD -- AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
>> AND PROBABLY AT MOST STATE AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
>> AND PROBABLY AT MOST STATE LEVELS.
>> AND PROBABLY AT MOST STATE LEVELS.
>> BUT AGAIN, WHY THAT IS 58 LEVELS.
>> BUT AGAIN, WHY THAT IS 58 YEARS AGO.
>> BUT AGAIN, WHY THAT IS 58 YEARS AGO.
YOU WOULD THINK THEY -- YEARS AGO.
YOU WOULD THINK THEY -- THAT THE INFLUENCE OF THAT WOULD YOU WOULD THINK THEY -- THAT THE INFLUENCE OF THAT WOULD HAVE LEFT BUT IT HASN'T?
THAT THE INFLUENCE OF THAT WOULD HAVE LEFT BUT IT HASN'T?
>> IT HASN'T.
HAVE LEFT BUT IT HASN'T?
>> IT HASN'T.
IT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH THE ROLE >> IT HASN'T.
IT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH THE ROLE OF WOMEN BEHIND THE SCENES AND IT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH THE ROLE OF WOMEN BEHIND THE SCENES AND THE ROLE OF WOMEN ON THE OF WOMEN BEHIND THE SCENES AND THE ROLE OF WOMEN ON THE CORPORATE SIDE OF HOLLYWOOD BUT THE ROLE OF WOMEN ON THE CORPORATE SIDE OF HOLLYWOOD BUT WE ARE IN THIS MOMENT NOW CORPORATE SIDE OF HOLLYWOOD BUT WE ARE IN THIS MOMENT NOW DOMESTICALLY AND GLOBALLY WHERE WE ARE IN THIS MOMENT NOW DOMESTICALLY AND GLOBALLY WHERE WE ARE SEEING A FOCUS ON WOMEN, DOMESTICALLY AND GLOBALLY WHERE WE ARE SEEING A FOCUS ON WOMEN, WOMEN'S LIVES, WOMEN'S RIGHTS WE ARE SEEING A FOCUS ON WOMEN, WOMEN'S LIVES, WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND WOMEN'S HEALTH AND I FEEL WOMEN'S LIVES, WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND WOMEN'S HEALTH AND I FEEL OPTIMISTIC THAT HOLLYWOOD WILL AND WOMEN'S HEALTH AND I FEEL OPTIMISTIC THAT HOLLYWOOD WILL CATCH UP.
OPTIMISTIC THAT HOLLYWOOD WILL CATCH UP.
>> I THINK IT GOES BACK TO CATCH UP.
>> I THINK IT GOES BACK TO MONEY.
>> I THINK IT GOES BACK TO MONEY.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT IS TRIED MONEY.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT IS TRIED AND THE FIRST MOVIE PORTRAYED IT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT IS TRIED AND THE FIRST MOVIE PORTRAYED IT THIS WAY IN A WHILE.
AND THE FIRST MOVIE PORTRAYED IT THIS WAY IN A WHILE.
IT IS A RISK.
THIS WAY IN A WHILE.
IT IS A RISK.
MONETARILY IT IS A RISK TO IT IS A RISK.
MONETARILY IT IS A RISK TO CREATE A MOVIE LIKE THIS THAT IS MONETARILY IT IS A RISK TO CREATE A MOVIE LIKE THIS THAT IS SUBVERSIVE.
CREATE A MOVIE LIKE THIS THAT IS SUBVERSIVE.
IT IS A RISK FOR NBC TO AIR SUBVERSIVE.
IT IS A RISK FOR NBC TO AIR PREVIEWS.
IT IS A RISK FOR NBC TO AIR PREVIEWS.
>> SHOULD HAVING AN ABORTION BE PREVIEWS.
>> SHOULD HAVING AN ABORTION BE SEEN AS SUBVERSIVE?
>> SHOULD HAVING AN ABORTION BE SEEN AS SUBVERSIVE?
>> I'M NOT ARGUING THAT IT SEEN AS SUBVERSIVE?
>> I'M NOT ARGUING THAT IT SHOULD BE SEEN THAT WAY BUT I >> I'M NOT ARGUING THAT IT SHOULD BE SEEN THAT WAY BUT I THINK AGAIN GOING BACK TO POLLS SHOULD BE SEEN THAT WAY BUT I THINK AGAIN GOING BACK TO POLLS HALF OF AMERICA THINKS THAT THINK AGAIN GOING BACK TO POLLS HALF OF AMERICA THINKS THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE LEGAL OR HALF OF AMERICA THINKS THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL OR IT SHOULD BE ONLY ABORTION SHOULD BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL OR IT SHOULD BE ONLY LIMITED.
ILLEGAL OR IT SHOULD BE ONLY LIMITED.
>> ONE IN THREE AMERICAN WOMEN LIMITED.
>> ONE IN THREE AMERICAN WOMEN HAS AN ABORTION DURING HER >> ONE IN THREE AMERICAN WOMEN HAS AN ABORTION DURING HER LIFETIME.
HAS AN ABORTION DURING HER LIFETIME.
>> LET ME TAKE A SECOND TO TELL LIFETIME.
>> LET ME TAKE A SECOND TO TELL YOU AN INTERESTING STORY.
>> LET ME TAKE A SECOND TO TELL YOU AN INTERESTING STORY.
THAT YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN.
YOU AN INTERESTING STORY.
THAT YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN.
TWO YEARS AGO I WAS AT NET ROOTS THAT YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN.
TWO YEARS AGO I WAS AT NET ROOTS THE PREMIER PROGRESSIVE TWO YEARS AGO I WAS AT NET ROOTS THE PREMIER PROGRESSIVE CONFERENCE AND ONE OF THE THE PREMIER PROGRESSIVE CONFERENCE AND ONE OF THE CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS SPEAKING CONFERENCE AND ONE OF THE CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS SPEAKING WANTED TO GLORIFY ABORTION AND CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS SPEAKING WANTED TO GLORIFY ABORTION AND ASKED EVERYONE WHO HAD AN WANTED TO GLORIFY ABORTION AND ASKED EVERYONE WHO HAD AN ABORTION TO STAND UP AND SAY I'M ASKED EVERYONE WHO HAD AN ABORTION TO STAND UP AND SAY I'M PROUD TO SAY I'VE HAD AN ABORTION TO STAND UP AND SAY I'M PROUD TO SAY I'VE HAD AN ABORTION AND I AM NOT ASHAMED.
PROUD TO SAY I'VE HAD AN ABORTION AND I AM NOT ASHAMED.
THERE WERE 250-500 WOMEN IN ABORTION AND I AM NOT ASHAMED.
THERE WERE 250-500 WOMEN IN ROOM.
THERE WERE 250-500 WOMEN IN ROOM.
BY YOUR STATISTICS YOU WOULD ROOM.
BY YOUR STATISTICS YOU WOULD THINK THAT MORE THAN A HANDFUL BY YOUR STATISTICS YOU WOULD THINK THAT MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE HAD AN ABORTION.
THINK THAT MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE HAD AN ABORTION.
ONLY A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE STOOD OF PEOPLE HAD AN ABORTION.
ONLY A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE STOOD UP.
ONLY A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE STOOD UP.
EVEN WITH PROGRESSIVE CULTURE UP.
EVEN WITH PROGRESSIVE CULTURE IT'S STILL LOOKED AT AS EVEN WITH PROGRESSIVE CULTURE IT'S STILL LOOKED AT AS SOMETHING TO BE ASHAMED OF.
IT'S STILL LOOKED AT AS SOMETHING TO BE ASHAMED OF.
>> THE QUESTION IS THE SOMETHING TO BE ASHAMED OF.
>> THE QUESTION IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS >> THE QUESTION IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS CULTURE AND PUBLIC OPINION.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS CULTURE AND PUBLIC OPINION.
IT IS A CHICKEN AND EGG CULTURE AND PUBLIC OPINION.
IT IS A CHICKEN AND EGG CONVERSATION WE ARE IT IS A CHICKEN AND EGG CONVERSATION WE ARE UNDERSTANDING PERHAPS THE REASON CONVERSATION WE ARE UNDERSTANDING PERHAPS THE REASON THERE IS A STIGMA IS BECAUSE THE UNDERSTANDING PERHAPS THE REASON THERE IS A STIGMA IS BECAUSE THE MEDIA HAS BEEN RELUCTANT TO SHOW THERE IS A STIGMA IS BECAUSE THE MEDIA HAS BEEN RELUCTANT TO SHOW THE TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES.
MEDIA HAS BEEN RELUCTANT TO SHOW THE TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.
THE TOTALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVES.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.
WHEN TRADITION MEANS TORTURE.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.
WHEN TRADITION MEANS TORTURE.
FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, WHEN TRADITION MEANS TORTURE.
FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE HAS FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE HAS MADE MONEY FOR ITS OWNERS, WON THE TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE HAS MADE MONEY FOR ITS OWNERS, WON RIBBONS FOR RIDERS AND DAZZLED MADE MONEY FOR ITS OWNERS, WON RIBBONS FOR RIDERS AND DAZZLED AUDIENCES WITH A UNIQUE GAIT BUT RIBBONS FOR RIDERS AND DAZZLED AUDIENCES WITH A UNIQUE GAIT BUT OFTENTIMES THAT SUCCESS COMES AT AUDIENCES WITH A UNIQUE GAIT BUT OFTENTIMES THAT SUCCESS COMES AT THE EXPENSE OF THE BELOVED OFTENTIMES THAT SUCCESS COMES AT THE EXPENSE OF THE BELOVED BREED.
THE EXPENSE OF THE BELOVED BREED.
>> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT BREED.
>> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES OF THE >> THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES OF THE TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE.
GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES OF THE TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE.
THEY NEED TO KNOW THE ABUSE THAT TENNESSEE WALKING HORSE.
THEY NEED TO KNOW THE ABUSE THAT GOES ON, THE CRUELTY THAT GOES THEY NEED TO KNOW THE ABUSE THAT GOES ON, THE CRUELTY THAT GOES ON TO GET THESE WALKING HORSES GOES ON, THE CRUELTY THAT GOES ON TO GET THESE WALKING HORSES TO DO WHAT THEY DO.
ON TO GET THESE WALKING HORSES TO DO WHAT THEY DO.
>> PRISCILLA PRESLEY WIDOW OF TO DO WHAT THEY DO.
>> PRISCILLA PRESLEY WIDOW OF ELVIS PRESLEY IS A NUMBER OF >> PRISCILLA PRESLEY WIDOW OF ELVIS PRESLEY IS A NUMBER OF ADVOCATES WHO WANT CONGRESS TO ELVIS PRESLEY IS A NUMBER OF ADVOCATES WHO WANT CONGRESS TO TAKE ACTION SO DOES ILLINOIS ADVOCATES WHO WANT CONGRESS TO TAKE ACTION SO DOES ILLINOIS DEMOCRAT JAN SCHAKOWSKY WHO SAYS TAKE ACTION SO DOES ILLINOIS DEMOCRAT JAN SCHAKOWSKY WHO SAYS IT'S TORTURE.
DEMOCRAT JAN SCHAKOWSKY WHO SAYS IT'S TORTURE.
>> IN ORDER TO GET TENNESSEE IT'S TORTURE.
>> IN ORDER TO GET TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES TO DO THAT LIFT >> IN ORDER TO GET TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES TO DO THAT LIFT IN AN UNNATURAL WAY, THEY WALKING HORSES TO DO THAT LIFT IN AN UNNATURAL WAY, THEY ACTUALLY BURN AND HURT, INJURE IN AN UNNATURAL WAY, THEY ACTUALLY BURN AND HURT, INJURE THE HORSES SO THAT THEY SO IT ACTUALLY BURN AND HURT, INJURE THE HORSES SO THAT THEY SO IT HURTS FOR THEM TO PUT THEIR FEET THE HORSES SO THAT THEY SO IT HURTS FOR THEM TO PUT THEIR FEET DOWN AND THEY LIFT THEM UP.
HURTS FOR THEM TO PUT THEIR FEET DOWN AND THEY LIFT THEM UP.
>> THE CONTROVERSIAL MOVEMENT IS DOWN AND THEY LIFT THEM UP.
>> THE CONTROVERSIAL MOVEMENT IS CALLED THE BIG LICK, THE >> THE CONTROVERSIAL MOVEMENT IS CALLED THE BIG LICK, THE INHUMANE PRACTICE USED BY SOME CALLED THE BIG LICK, THE INHUMANE PRACTICE USED BY SOME TRAINERS IS CALLED SORING.
INHUMANE PRACTICE USED BY SOME TRAINERS IS CALLED SORING.
CRUEL METHODS SORE HORSES WHICH TRAINERS IS CALLED SORING.
CRUEL METHODS SORE HORSES WHICH INCLUDE PAINTING ON INJECTING CRUEL METHODS SORE HORSES WHICH INCLUDE PAINTING ON INJECTING CAUSTIC CHEMICALS IN THE HORSE'S INCLUDE PAINTING ON INJECTING CAUSTIC CHEMICALS IN THE HORSE'S LEGS SUCH AS DIESEL FUEL OR CAUSTIC CHEMICALS IN THE HORSE'S LEGS SUCH AS DIESEL FUEL OR KEROSENE AND WRAPPING THE LEGS LEGS SUCH AS DIESEL FUEL OR KEROSENE AND WRAPPING THE LEGS IN PLASTIC SO THE CHEMICALS BURN KEROSENE AND WRAPPING THE LEGS IN PLASTIC SO THE CHEMICALS BURN THE FLESH.
IN PLASTIC SO THE CHEMICALS BURN THE FLESH.
>> THEY PUT CHAINS ON THE ANKLES THE FLESH.
>> THEY PUT CHAINS ON THE ANKLES OF THE HORSE SO IT HITS THE >> THEY PUT CHAINS ON THE ANKLES OF THE HORSE SO IT HITS THE INJURED ACCIDENT.
OF THE HORSE SO IT HITS THE INJURED ACCIDENT.
AND THERE IS PRESSURE SHOEING INJURED ACCIDENT.
AND THERE IS PRESSURE SHOEING WHERE THEY TRIM THE HORSES HOOFS AND THERE IS PRESSURE SHOEING WHERE THEY TRIM THE HORSES HOOFS TO THE QUICK AND THEN THEY AFTER WHERE THEY TRIM THE HORSES HOOFS TO THE QUICK AND THEN THEY AFTER THEY DO THAT THEY TIGHTLY NAIL TO THE QUICK AND THEN THEY AFTER THEY DO THAT THEY TIGHTLY NAIL IN THE SHOE AND PUT THINGS THEY DO THAT THEY TIGHTLY NAIL IN THE SHOE AND PUT THINGS INSIDE THE HOOFS.
IN THE SHOE AND PUT THINGS INSIDE THE HOOFS.
>> SUFFICIENT AS GOLF BALLS, INSIDE THE HOOFS.
>> SUFFICIENT AS GOLF BALLS, SCREWS AND OTHER FOREIGN >> SUFFICIENT AS GOLF BALLS, SCREWS AND OTHER FOREIGN OBJECTS.
SCREWS AND OTHER FOREIGN OBJECTS.
SORING HAS BEEN OUTLAWED SINCE OBJECTS.
SORING HAS BEEN OUTLAWED SINCE THE HORSE PROTECTION ACT OF SORING HAS BEEN OUTLAWED SINCE THE HORSE PROTECTION ACT OF 1970.
THE HORSE PROTECTION ACT OF 1970.
BUT ENFORCEMENT BY THE USDA HAS 1970.
BUT ENFORCEMENT BY THE USDA HAS BEEN LIMITED THAT DUE TO A LACK BUT ENFORCEMENT BY THE USDA HAS BEEN LIMITED THAT DUE TO A LACK OF FUNDING.
BEEN LIMITED THAT DUE TO A LACK OF FUNDING.
THE USDA CAN ONLY AFFORD TO OF FUNDING.
THE USDA CAN ONLY AFFORD TO ATTEND FEWER THAN 10% OF THE THE USDA CAN ONLY AFFORD TO ATTEND FEWER THAN 10% OF THE MORE THAN 300 SHOWS WHERE ATTEND FEWER THAN 10% OF THE MORE THAN 300 SHOWS WHERE TENNESSEE WALKERS ARE EXHIBITED.
MORE THAN 300 SHOWS WHERE TENNESSEE WALKERS ARE EXHIBITED.
>> THE PROBLEM WAS THE TENNESSEE WALKERS ARE EXHIBITED.
>> THE PROBLEM WAS THE INSPECTIONS WERE ALL DONE BY AN >> THE PROBLEM WAS THE INSPECTIONS WERE ALL DONE BY AN ASSOCIATION THAT PAID FOR BY THE INSPECTIONS WERE ALL DONE BY AN ASSOCIATION THAT PAID FOR BY THE PEOPLE WHO SHOWED TENNESSEE ASSOCIATION THAT PAID FOR BY THE PEOPLE WHO SHOWED TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES.
PEOPLE WHO SHOWED TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES.
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO PROFIT FROM WALKING HORSES.
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO PROFIT FROM THIS.
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO PROFIT FROM THIS.
DOING THE SHOWS, SELLING THE THIS.
DOING THE SHOWS, SELLING THE HORSES.
DOING THE SHOWS, SELLING THE HORSES.
SOMETIMES SELLING THEM FOR LOTS HORSES.
SOMETIMES SELLING THEM FOR LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY.
SOMETIMES SELLING THEM FOR LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY.
AND THEN SOMEHOW THE PRESENTING AND LOTS OF MONEY.
AND THEN SOMEHOW THE PRESENTING TEENAGE.
AND THEN SOMEHOW THE PRESENTING TEENAGE.
>> PRESLEYS HAD TENNESSEE TEENAGE.
>> PRESLEYS HAD TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES AT GRACELAND >> PRESLEYS HAD TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES AT GRACELAND AFTER FALLING IN LOVE WITH THE WALKING HORSES AT GRACELAND AFTER FALLING IN LOVE WITH THE BREED AND NAMED ONE AFTER THEIR AFTER FALLING IN LOVE WITH THE BREED AND NAMED ONE AFTER THEIR HOME.
BREED AND NAMED ONE AFTER THEIR HOME.
A TROPHY IN HONOR OF HER HOME.
A TROPHY IN HONOR OF HER FAMILY'S CHAMPION HORSE WAS A TROPHY IN HONOR OF HER FAMILY'S CHAMPION HORSE WAS FORMERLY AWARDED EVERY YEAR AT FAMILY'S CHAMPION HORSE WAS FORMERLY AWARDED EVERY YEAR AT THE MOST RENOWNED SHOW IN THE FORMERLY AWARDED EVERY YEAR AT THE MOST RENOWNED SHOW IN THE INDUSTRY THE CELEBRATION.
THE MOST RENOWNED SHOW IN THE INDUSTRY THE CELEBRATION.
THE EVENT IN TENNESSEE ATTRACTS INDUSTRY THE CELEBRATION.
THE EVENT IN TENNESSEE ATTRACTS NEARLY A QUARTER OF A MILLION THE EVENT IN TENNESSEE ATTRACTS NEARLY A QUARTER OF A MILLION FANS FOR MORE THAN 40 STATES.
NEARLY A QUARTER OF A MILLION FANS FOR MORE THAN 40 STATES.
>> ONE OF THE REASONS I GOT FANS FOR MORE THAN 40 STATES.
>> ONE OF THE REASONS I GOT INVOLVE SECOND THIS TROPHY WAS >> ONE OF THE REASONS I GOT INVOLVE SECOND THIS TROPHY WAS BEING PASSED AROUND.
INVOLVE SECOND THIS TROPHY WAS BEING PASSED AROUND.
SO I ASKED MIKE INDMAN THE BEING PASSED AROUND.
SO I ASKED MIKE INDMAN THE C.E.O.
OF THE CELEBRATION, TO SO I ASKED MIKE INDMAN THE C.E.O.
OF THE CELEBRATION, TO PLEASE GIVE IT BACK.
C.E.O.
OF THE CELEBRATION, TO PLEASE GIVE IT BACK.
THAT WE NO LONGER SUPPORT IT.
PLEASE GIVE IT BACK.
THAT WE NO LONGER SUPPORT IT.
>> PRESLEY PARTNERS WITH THE THAT WE NO LONGER SUPPORT IT.
>> PRESLEY PARTNERS WITH THE HUMANE SOCIETY TO LOBBY CONGRESS >> PRESLEY PARTNERS WITH THE HUMANE SOCIETY TO LOBBY CONGRESS FOR SUPPORT OF THE ACT WITH HUMANE SOCIETY TO LOBBY CONGRESS FOR SUPPORT OF THE ACT WITH REFORMS AIMED AT ELIMINATING FOR SUPPORT OF THE ACT WITH REFORMS AIMED AT ELIMINATING CORRUPT SELF POLICING AND REFORMS AIMED AT ELIMINATING CORRUPT SELF POLICING AND APPLYING STRICTER PENALTIES FOR CORRUPT SELF POLICING AND APPLYING STRICTER PENALTIES FOR VIOLATORS AND SOME MEMBERS OF APPLYING STRICTER PENALTIES FOR VIOLATORS AND SOME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WORRY THE BILL VIOLATORS AND SOME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WORRY THE BILL THREATENS TRA DISMGHTS AT A CONGRESS WORRY THE BILL THREATENS TRA DISMGHTS AT A DEMONSTRATION ON CAPITOL HILL THREATENS TRA DISMGHTS AT A DEMONSTRATION ON CAPITOL HILL TENNESSEE WALKERS NOT TORTURED DEMONSTRATION ON CAPITOL HILL TENNESSEE WALKERS NOT TORTURED OR SORED PERFORMED THEIR FAMOUS TENNESSEE WALKERS NOT TORTURED OR SORED PERFORMED THEIR FAMOUS GAIT.
OR SORED PERFORMED THEIR FAMOUS GAIT.
THEY, THEIR RIDERS AND GAIT.
THEY, THEIR RIDERS AND SUPPORTERS WERE NOT JUST THERE THEY, THEIR RIDERS AND SUPPORTERS WERE NOT JUST THERE TO SUPPORT THE PAST ACT BUT TO SUPPORTERS WERE NOT JUST THERE TO SUPPORT THE PAST ACT BUT TO OUT AN ALTERNATIVE BILL THAT TO SUPPORT THE PAST ACT BUT TO OUT AN ALTERNATIVE BILL THAT PRETENDS TO PROTECT THE HORSES.
OUT AN ALTERNATIVE BILL THAT PRETENDS TO PROTECT THE HORSES.
SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH PRETENDS TO PROTECT THE HORSES.
SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH McCONNELL CO-SPONSORS ONE SUCH SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH McCONNELL CO-SPONSORS ONE SUCH PRETEND BILL AND REPRESENTATIVE McCONNELL CO-SPONSORS ONE SUCH PRETEND BILL AND REPRESENTATIVE MARSHA BLACKBURN HAS INTRODUCED PRETEND BILL AND REPRESENTATIVE MARSHA BLACKBURN HAS INTRODUCED HER OWN.
MARSHA BLACKBURN HAS INTRODUCED HER OWN.
>> THEY ARE SAYING IT WILL STOP HER OWN.
>> THEY ARE SAYING IT WILL STOP IT.
>> THEY ARE SAYING IT WILL STOP IT.
IT WILL NOT.
IT.
IT WILL NOT.
I KNOW THAT MARSHA BLACKBURN IS IT WILL NOT.
I KNOW THAT MARSHA BLACKBURN IS SAYING WE CAN USE TECHNOLOGY TO I KNOW THAT MARSHA BLACKBURN IS SAYING WE CAN USE TECHNOLOGY TO POLICE OR TO DO THE INSPECTIONS.
SAYING WE CAN USE TECHNOLOGY TO POLICE OR TO DO THE INSPECTIONS.
I MEAN THAT IS ANOTHER WAY OF POLICE OR TO DO THE INSPECTIONS.
I MEAN THAT IS ANOTHER WAY OF GETTING AWAY WITH WHAT THEY ARE I MEAN THAT IS ANOTHER WAY OF GETTING AWAY WITH WHAT THEY ARE DOING NOW.
GETTING AWAY WITH WHAT THEY ARE DOING NOW.
SO IT'S A SHAM.
DOING NOW.
SO IT'S A SHAM.
>> A BAD BILL IS WORSE THAN NO SO IT'S A SHAM.
>> A BAD BILL IS WORSE THAN NO BILL.
>> A BAD BILL IS WORSE THAN NO BILL.
BECAUSE I THINK IT COULD GIVE BILL.
BECAUSE I THINK IT COULD GIVE THE APPEARANCE THAT WE ARE BECAUSE I THINK IT COULD GIVE THE APPEARANCE THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING WHEN IN THE APPEARANCE THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING WHEN IN FACT WE AREN'T.
ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING WHEN IN FACT WE AREN'T.
>> THE THE PAST ACT HAS FACT WE AREN'T.
>> THE THE PAST ACT HAS BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FROM 300 >> THE THE PAST ACT HAS BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FROM 300 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS BUT IT BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FROM 300 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS BUT IT STALLED IN THE ENERGY AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS BUT IT STALLED IN THE ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE VICE-CHAIRED STALLED IN THE ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE VICE-CHAIRED BY BLACKBURN.
COMMERCE COMMITTEE VICE-CHAIRED BY BLACKBURN.
HER BILL HAS 12 COSPONSORS.
BY BLACKBURN.
HER BILL HAS 12 COSPONSORS.
>> I KNOW WE WOULD HAVE THE HER BILL HAS 12 COSPONSORS.
>> I KNOW WE WOULD HAVE THE VOTES IF WE COULD GET IT OUT OF >> I KNOW WE WOULD HAVE THE VOTES IF WE COULD GET IT OUT OF COMMITTEE AND MOVE IT ON TO THE VOTES IF WE COULD GET IT OUT OF COMMITTEE AND MOVE IT ON TO THE FLOOR.
COMMITTEE AND MOVE IT ON TO THE FLOOR.
IT IS JUST A MATTER OF FLOOR.
IT IS JUST A MATTER OF INCREASING THE PRESSURE.
IT IS JUST A MATTER OF INCREASING THE PRESSURE.
I KNOW THAT THERE IS LOTS OF INCREASING THE PRESSURE.
I KNOW THAT THERE IS LOTS OF OTHER PRIORITIES.
I KNOW THAT THERE IS LOTS OF OTHER PRIORITIES.
BUT WHY WOULD WE CONTINUE TO OTHER PRIORITIES.
BUT WHY WOULD WE CONTINUE TO ALLOW THIS INHUMANE PRACTICE TO BUT WHY WOULD WE CONTINUE TO ALLOW THIS INHUMANE PRACTICE TO CONTINUE?
ALLOW THIS INHUMANE PRACTICE TO CONTINUE?
>> I WOULD LOVE THE PUBLIC TO CONTINUE?
>> I WOULD LOVE THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON BEHIND THE >> I WOULD LOVE THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES.
KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES.
IF THEY KNEW AND THEY COULD CALL SCENES.
IF THEY KNEW AND THEY COULD CALL THEIR LEGISLATORS THEIR IF THEY KNEW AND THEY COULD CALL THEIR LEGISLATORS THEIR SENATORS, AND SAY PLEASE VOTE IN THEIR LEGISLATORS THEIR SENATORS, AND SAY PLEASE VOTE IN THE PAST ACT AND GET THIS ON THE SENATORS, AND SAY PLEASE VOTE IN THE PAST ACT AND GET THIS ON THE FLOOR.
THE PAST ACT AND GET THIS ON THE FLOOR.
I AM IN SHOCK IT HAS NOT GOTTEN FLOOR.
I AM IN SHOCK IT HAS NOT GOTTEN TO THE FLOOR AND DONE.
I AM IN SHOCK IT HAS NOT GOTTEN TO THE FLOOR AND DONE.
>> BY THE WAY, WE DID CALL TO THE FLOOR AND DONE.
>> BY THE WAY, WE DID CALL REPRESENTATIVE BLACKBURN FOR A >> BY THE WAY, WE DID CALL REPRESENTATIVE BLACKBURN FOR A RESPONSE AND GOT NO RESPONSE REPRESENTATIVE BLACKBURN FOR A RESPONSE AND GOT NO RESPONSE FROM HER OFFICE.
RESPONSE AND GOT NO RESPONSE FROM HER OFFICE.
HOLLY WELCOME TO THE PANEL.
FROM HER OFFICE.
HOLLY WELCOME TO THE PANEL.
I OWN A HORSE FARM OUTSIDE HOLLY WELCOME TO THE PANEL.
I OWN A HORSE FARM OUTSIDE WASHINGTON D.C.
I AM A HUNTER, I OWN A HORSE FARM OUTSIDE WASHINGTON D.C.
I AM A HUNTER, JUMPER RIDER.
WASHINGTON D.C.
I AM A HUNTER, JUMPER RIDER.
THERE'S CRUELTY IN THE DIVISION JUMPER RIDER.
THERE'S CRUELTY IN THE DIVISION THAT I GO IN SURELY USE OF DRUGS THERE'S CRUELTY IN THE DIVISION THAT I GO IN SURELY USE OF DRUGS HAS BEEN POINTED OUT AND SUCH.
THAT I GO IN SURELY USE OF DRUGS HAS BEEN POINTED OUT AND SUCH.
BUT THIS IS NOTHING COMPARED TO HAS BEEN POINTED OUT AND SUCH.
BUT THIS IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT THEY DO TO THE WALKER BUT THIS IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT THEY DO TO THE WALKER HORSES.
WHAT THEY DO TO THE WALKER HORSES.
AND I'M SUCH A FAN I MUST SAY HORSES.
AND I'M SUCH A FAN I MUST SAY I'M OUTING MYSELF OF THE WORK AND I'M SUCH A FAN I MUST SAY I'M OUTING MYSELF OF THE WORK YOU ARE DOING.
I'M OUTING MYSELF OF THE WORK YOU ARE DOING.
IN THIS DAY AND AGE HOW COULD YOU ARE DOING.
IN THIS DAY AND AGE HOW COULD PEOPLE WANT TO DO THIS?
IN THIS DAY AND AGE HOW COULD PEOPLE WANT TO DO THIS?
>> YOU KNOW THE AN MAS I THINK PEOPLE WANT TO DO THIS?
>> YOU KNOW THE AN MAS I THINK YOU HIT ON IT.
>> YOU KNOW THE AN MAS I THINK YOU HIT ON IT.
ANYWHERE WHERE PEOPLE AND YOU HIT ON IT.
ANYWHERE WHERE PEOPLE AND ANIMALS ARE TOGETHER THERE ARE ANYWHERE WHERE PEOPLE AND ANIMALS ARE TOGETHER THERE ARE GOING TO BE PEOPLE WHO EMPLOY ANIMALS ARE TOGETHER THERE ARE GOING TO BE PEOPLE WHO EMPLOY CRUEL TECHNIQUES TO GET AHEAD.
GOING TO BE PEOPLE WHO EMPLOY CRUEL TECHNIQUES TO GET AHEAD.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND CRUEL TECHNIQUES TO GET AHEAD.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND THIS INDUSTRY IS THAT THE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND THIS INDUSTRY IS THAT THE CRUELTY IS RIGHT AT THE CORE OF THIS INDUSTRY IS THAT THE CRUELTY IS RIGHT AT THE CORE OF THE INDUSTRY.
CRUELTY IS RIGHT AT THE CORE OF THE INDUSTRY.
IT'S WITH THE INDUSTRY LEADERS THE INDUSTRY.
IT'S WITH THE INDUSTRY LEADERS AND THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT FUND IT'S WITH THE INDUSTRY LEADERS AND THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT FUND AND PROMOTE THE PRACTICES.
AND THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT FUND AND PROMOTE THE PRACTICES.
AND SO THE ONLY WAY TO GET TO AND PROMOTE THE PRACTICES.
AND SO THE ONLY WAY TO GET TO THE CRUELTY AND ABOLISH IT IT IS AND SO THE ONLY WAY TO GET TO THE CRUELTY AND ABOLISH IT IT IS TO GET RID OF THE INDUSTRY THE CRUELTY AND ABOLISH IT IT IS TO GET RID OF THE INDUSTRY ITSELF AND SUPPORT THE TENNESSEE TO GET RID OF THE INDUSTRY ITSELF AND SUPPORT THE TENNESSEE WALKER IN THE KINDS OF SHOWS ITSELF AND SUPPORT THE TENNESSEE WALKER IN THE KINDS OF SHOWS WITH THE KINDS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE WALKER IN THE KINDS OF SHOWS WITH THE KINDS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THEM AND WITH THE KINDS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THEM AND HAVE COMPASSION FOR THEM.
GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THEM AND HAVE COMPASSION FOR THEM.
>> HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN HAVE COMPASSION FOR THEM.
>> HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN WORKING ON THIS BILL?
>> HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN WORKING ON THIS BILL?
AND WHAT IS THE CHANCE OF WORKING ON THIS BILL?
AND WHAT IS THE CHANCE OF PASSAGE?
AND WHAT IS THE CHANCE OF PASSAGE?
>> WE ARE VERY HOPEFUL IT'S PASSAGE?
>> WE ARE VERY HOPEFUL IT'S GOING TO PASS.
>> WE ARE VERY HOPEFUL IT'S GOING TO PASS.
THE ONLY ISSUE NOW IS TIMING.
GOING TO PASS.
THE ONLY ISSUE NOW IS TIMING.
THERE ARE FEW LEGISLATIVE DAYS THE ONLY ISSUE NOW IS TIMING.
THERE ARE FEW LEGISLATIVE DAYS LEFT BUT WE HAVE GOT NOT THERE ARE FEW LEGISLATIVE DAYS LEFT BUT WE HAVE GOT NOT UNPRECEDENTED BUT A SIGNIFICANT LEFT BUT WE HAVE GOT NOT UNPRECEDENTED BUT A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF AMOUNT OF SUPPORT ON UNPRECEDENTED BUT A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF AMOUNT OF SUPPORT ON THE HILL FROM THE REPUBLICANS NUMBER OF AMOUNT OF SUPPORT ON THE HILL FROM THE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS.
THE HILL FROM THE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS.
WE HAVE 350 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND DEMOCRATS.
WE HAVE 350 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND SENATORS WHO ARE SUPPORTING WE HAVE 350 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND SENATORS WHO ARE SUPPORTING THIS BILL.
AND SENATORS WHO ARE SUPPORTING THIS BILL.
120 OF THEM REPUBLICANS.
THIS BILL.
120 OF THEM REPUBLICANS.
SO THERE'S SIGNIFICANT AND BROAD 120 OF THEM REPUBLICANS.
SO THERE'S SIGNIFICANT AND BROAD SUPPORT FOR THIS LEGISLATION.
SO THERE'S SIGNIFICANT AND BROAD SUPPORT FOR THIS LEGISLATION.
>> AND WHY IS IT THAT WHAT IS SUPPORT FOR THIS LEGISLATION.
>> AND WHY IS IT THAT WHAT IS MOTIVATING MARSHA BLACKBURN, >> AND WHY IS IT THAT WHAT IS MOTIVATING MARSHA BLACKBURN, MITCH McCONNELL, RAND PAUL IS MOTIVATING MARSHA BLACKBURN, MITCH McCONNELL, RAND PAUL IS A COSPONSOR OF THE WHAT WE CALL MITCH McCONNELL, RAND PAUL IS A COSPONSOR OF THE WHAT WE CALL PRETEND BILL BECAUSE IT HAS A A COSPONSOR OF THE WHAT WE CALL PRETEND BILL BECAUSE IT HAS A NAME THAT MAKES IT SOUND LIKE IT PRETEND BILL BECAUSE IT HAS A NAME THAT MAKES IT SOUND LIKE IT WILL SAVE THE HORSES YET IT NAME THAT MAKES IT SOUND LIKE IT WILL SAVE THE HORSES YET IT ALLOWS THE HORRIBLE PRACTICES TO WILL SAVE THE HORSES YET IT ALLOWS THE HORRIBLE PRACTICES TO KEEP GOING ON.
ALLOWS THE HORRIBLE PRACTICES TO KEEP GOING ON.
WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS?
KEEP GOING ON.
WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS?
>> I THINK IT'S FOR THOSE OF US WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS?
>> I THINK IT'S FOR THOSE OF US WHO HAVE BEEN IN WASHINGTON A >> I THINK IT'S FOR THOSE OF US WHO HAVE BEEN IN WASHINGTON A LONGTIME, IT'S HARD TO COME UP WHO HAVE BEEN IN WASHINGTON A LONGTIME, IT'S HARD TO COME UP WITH A CASE OR ISSUE WHERE THERE LONGTIME, IT'S HARD TO COME UP WITH A CASE OR ISSUE WHERE THERE IS NOT SOME CYNICISM SURROUNDING WITH A CASE OR ISSUE WHERE THERE IS NOT SOME CYNICISM SURROUNDING IT.
IS NOT SOME CYNICISM SURROUNDING IT.
IN THE CASE OF ALEXANDER A IT.
IN THE CASE OF ALEXANDER A STRONG PROPONENT OF THE TROJAN IN THE CASE OF ALEXANDER A STRONG PROPONENT OF THE TROJAN HORSE BILL AND STEVE SMITH HIS STRONG PROPONENT OF THE TROJAN HORSE BILL AND STEVE SMITH HIS CAMPAIGN DIRECTOR IS THE HORSE BILL AND STEVE SMITH HIS CAMPAIGN DIRECTOR IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE HORSE INDUSTRY CAMPAIGN DIRECTOR IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE HORSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION THAT IS PROMOTING PRESIDENT OF THE HORSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION THAT IS PROMOTING THE STATUS QUO AND THE ISSUE OF ASSOCIATION THAT IS PROMOTING THE STATUS QUO AND THE ISSUE OF THE CASE OF MARSHA BLACKBURN SHE THE STATUS QUO AND THE ISSUE OF THE CASE OF MARSHA BLACKBURN SHE HAS BEEN SUPPORTED BY THE THE CASE OF MARSHA BLACKBURN SHE HAS BEEN SUPPORTED BY THE INDUSTRY.
HAS BEEN SUPPORTED BY THE INDUSTRY.
THEY HELD A $100 A PERSON INDUSTRY.
THEY HELD A $100 A PERSON CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISER FOR HER.
THEY HELD A $100 A PERSON CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISER FOR HER.
AND THEN TWO MONTHS LATER SHE CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISER FOR HER.
AND THEN TWO MONTHS LATER SHE CAME OUT WITH HER VERSION OF THE AND THEN TWO MONTHS LATER SHE CAME OUT WITH HER VERSION OF THE BILL.
CAME OUT WITH HER VERSION OF THE BILL.
I THINK IT'S WHAT PEOPLE DON'T BILL.
I THINK IT'S WHAT PEOPLE DON'T LIKE ABOUT WASHINGTON.
I THINK IT'S WHAT PEOPLE DON'T LIKE ABOUT WASHINGTON.
>> THAT IS UNFAIR TO PUT WORDS LIKE ABOUT WASHINGTON.
>> THAT IS UNFAIR TO PUT WORDS OR ASIGH A MOTIVATION.
>> THAT IS UNFAIR TO PUT WORDS OR ASIGH A MOTIVATION.
I UNDERSTAND THAT IS HOW OR ASIGH A MOTIVATION.
I UNDERSTAND THAT IS HOW WASHINGTON WORKS.
I UNDERSTAND THAT IS HOW WASHINGTON WORKS.
>> IN FAIRNESS NOT JUST TO HER WASHINGTON WORKS.
>> IN FAIRNESS NOT JUST TO HER BUT ISN'T MONEY ALWAYS BEHIND >> IN FAIRNESS NOT JUST TO HER BUT ISN'T MONEY ALWAYS BEHIND THESE THINGS?
BUT ISN'T MONEY ALWAYS BEHIND THESE THINGS?
>> LET'S LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE.
THESE THINGS?
>> LET'S LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE.
I PRINTED OUT WHAT THE BILL >> LET'S LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE.
I PRINTED OUT WHAT THE BILL DOES.
I PRINTED OUT WHAT THE BILL DOES.
ONE OF THE THINGS IT CREATES A DOES.
ONE OF THE THINGS IT CREATES A NEW LICENSING PROCESS FOR ONE OF THE THINGS IT CREATES A NEW LICENSING PROCESS FOR INSPECTORS REQUIRING USDA TO NEW LICENSING PROCESS FOR INSPECTORS REQUIRING USDA TO TRAIN LICENSE AND APPOINT INSPECTORS REQUIRING USDA TO TRAIN LICENSE AND APPOINT INDEPENDENT INSPECTORS, LICENSED TRAIN LICENSE AND APPOINT INDEPENDENT INSPECTORS, LICENSED OR ACCREDITED VETERINARIANS WERE INDEPENDENT INSPECTORS, LICENSED OR ACCREDITED VETERINARIANS WERE GIVEN PREFERENCE.
OR ACCREDITED VETERINARIANS WERE GIVEN PREFERENCE.
WHO STANDS TO BENEFIT?
GIVEN PREFERENCE.
WHO STANDS TO BENEFIT?
THE VETERINARIANS ASSOCIATION.
WHO STANDS TO BENEFIT?
THE VETERINARIANS ASSOCIATION.
AND I STARTED TO RUN THE THE VETERINARIANS ASSOCIATION.
AND I STARTED TO RUN THE NUMBERS.
AND I STARTED TO RUN THE NUMBERS.
>> MY RESPONSE IS THAT THE NUMBERS.
>> MY RESPONSE IS THAT THE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE >> MY RESPONSE IS THAT THE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE FOR 40 YEARS.
INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE FOR 40 YEARS.
40 YEARS TO RUN THIS THEMSELVES FOR 40 YEARS.
40 YEARS TO RUN THIS THEMSELVES WITHOUT LICENSING.
40 YEARS TO RUN THIS THEMSELVES WITHOUT LICENSING.
TO RUN THE INSPECTIONS AND MAKE WITHOUT LICENSING.
TO RUN THE INSPECTIONS AND MAKE SURE THESE PRACTICES ARE NOT TO RUN THE INSPECTIONS AND MAKE SURE THESE PRACTICES ARE NOT TAKING PLACEMENT I MET WITH THE SURE THESE PRACTICES ARE NOT TAKING PLACEMENT I MET WITH THE INDUSTRY SIX YEARS AGO AND SAID TAKING PLACEMENT I MET WITH THE INDUSTRY SIX YEARS AGO AND SAID LET'S FIGURE OUT A PATH FORWARD INDUSTRY SIX YEARS AGO AND SAID LET'S FIGURE OUT A PATH FORWARD WHERE THERE IS NOT THIS ABUSE.
LET'S FIGURE OUT A PATH FORWARD WHERE THERE IS NOT THIS ABUSE.
I WAS MANIPULATED AND LIED TO.
WHERE THERE IS NOT THIS ABUSE.
I WAS MANIPULATED AND LIED TO.
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF I WAS MANIPULATED AND LIED TO.
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHARGED WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHARGED WITH BRINGING THESE VETERINARIANS AGRICULTURE CHARGED WITH BRINGING THESE VETERINARIANS ONBOARD NOW WHICH HOPEFULLY HAS BRINGING THESE VETERINARIANS ONBOARD NOW WHICH HOPEFULLY HAS BEEN TRYING TO WORK WITH THE ONBOARD NOW WHICH HOPEFULLY HAS BEEN TRYING TO WORK WITH THE INDUSTRY FOR 40 YEARS TO GET BEEN TRYING TO WORK WITH THE INDUSTRY FOR 40 YEARS TO GET THEM TO POLICE THEMSELVES AND WE INDUSTRY FOR 40 YEARS TO GET THEM TO POLICE THEMSELVES AND WE HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL.
THEM TO POLICE THEMSELVES AND WE HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL.
>> WHO ELSE WOULD YOU HAVE?
HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL.
>> WHO ELSE WOULD YOU HAVE?
A VET CAN -- >> WHO ELSE WOULD YOU HAVE?
A VET CAN -- >> HOW MANY VETS ARE THERE IN A VET CAN -- >> HOW MANY VETS ARE THERE IN THE STATE OF TENNESSEE.
>> HOW MANY VETS ARE THERE IN THE STATE OF TENNESSEE.
THERE ARE THE AMERICAN -- THE STATE OF TENNESSEE.
THERE ARE THE AMERICAN -- >> YOU ARE SAYING THAT THIS IS THERE ARE THE AMERICAN -- >> YOU ARE SAYING THAT THIS IS WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
>> YOU ARE SAYING THAT THIS IS WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
BUT YOU ARE SAYING THIS PROCESS WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
BUT YOU ARE SAYING THIS PROCESS VETS -- BUT YOU ARE SAYING THIS PROCESS VETS -- THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.
VETS -- THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND WEB OUR THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND WEB OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRATY FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND WEB OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRATY WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK TO WEBSITE PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRATY WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK TO THE CONTRARY SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.
♪] FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ON-LINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ON-LINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF TO THE CONTRARY VISIT OUR ON-LINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF TO THE CONTRARY VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT OF TO THE CONTRARY VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRATY.
