Jill Abramson; GOP Women; Women's History Museum

AND BY THE CHARLES A. FRUEAUFF AND BY THE CHARLES A. FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

AND BY THE CHARLES A. FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" UP FRONT THE FIRING OF THE FIRST CONTRARY" UP FRONT THE FIRING OF THE FIRST WOMAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR AT THE UP FRONT THE FIRING OF THE FIRST WOMAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR AT THE "NEW YORK TIMES".

WOMAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR AT THE "NEW YORK TIMES".

THEN, THE GOP GENDER GAP GROWS "NEW YORK TIMES".

THEN, THE GOP GENDER GAP GROWS WITH REPUBLICAN WOMEN NOT THEN, THE GOP GENDER GAP GROWS WITH REPUBLICAN WOMEN NOT RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

WITH REPUBLICAN WOMEN NOT RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: GOING RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: GOING BIPARTISAN MEANS A NATIONAL BEHIND THE HEADLINES: GOING BIPARTISAN MEANS A NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM IS ONE BIPARTISAN MEANS A NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM IS ONE STEP CLOSER TO REALITY.

>> HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

>> HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A >> HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, THE MEDIA GENDER GAP.

PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, THE MEDIA GENDER GAP.

WAS JILL ABRAMSON FIRED AS UP FIRST, THE MEDIA GENDER GAP.

WAS JILL ABRAMSON FIRED AS EXECUTIVE EDITOR OF THE 'NEW WAS JILL ABRAMSON FIRED AS EXECUTIVE EDITOR OF THE 'NEW YORK TIMES' BECAUSE SHE ASKED EXECUTIVE EDITOR OF THE 'NEW YORK TIMES' BECAUSE SHE ASKED FOR EQUAL PAY?

YORK TIMES' BECAUSE SHE ASKED FOR EQUAL PAY?

ACCORDING TO REPORTS, THE FOR EQUAL PAY?

ACCORDING TO REPORTS, THE FIRST-EVER FEMALE IN THAT JOB ACCORDING TO REPORTS, THE FIRST-EVER FEMALE IN THAT JOB WAS NOT COMPENSATED AS WELL AS FIRST-EVER FEMALE IN THAT JOB WAS NOT COMPENSATED AS WELL AS THE MAN SHE REPLACED, BILL WAS NOT COMPENSATED AS WELL AS THE MAN SHE REPLACED, BILL KELLER.

THE MAN SHE REPLACED, BILL KELLER.

SHE EVEN REPORTEDLY EARNED LESS KELLER.

SHE EVEN REPORTEDLY EARNED LESS THAN ONE OF HER DEPUTIES.

SHE EVEN REPORTEDLY EARNED LESS THAN ONE OF HER DEPUTIES.

A "TIMES" SPOKESPERSON SAID HER THAN ONE OF HER DEPUTIES.

A "TIMES" SPOKESPERSON SAID HER TOTAL BENEFITS WERE "DIRECTLY A "TIMES" SPOKESPERSON SAID HER TOTAL BENEFITS WERE "DIRECTLY COMPARABLE" TO, THOUGH NOT THE TOTAL BENEFITS WERE "DIRECTLY COMPARABLE" TO, THOUGH NOT THE SAME AS, KELLER'S.

COMPARABLE" TO, THOUGH NOT THE SAME AS, KELLER'S.

ABRAMSON'S BRUSQUE STYLE AT SAME AS, KELLER'S.

ABRAMSON'S BRUSQUE STYLE AT TIMES WAS WELL KNOWN.

ABRAMSON'S BRUSQUE STYLE AT TIMES WAS WELL KNOWN.

BUT THIS AND OTHER INCIDENTS TIMES WAS WELL KNOWN.

BUT THIS AND OTHER INCIDENTS ACROSS THE WORLD HAVE RAISED BUT THIS AND OTHER INCIDENTS ACROSS THE WORLD HAVE RAISED SUSPICIONS AGAIN THAT JOURNALISM ACROSS THE WORLD HAVE RAISED SUSPICIONS AGAIN THAT JOURNALISM STILL HAS A "WOMAN PROBLEM."

SUSPICIONS AGAIN THAT JOURNALISM STILL HAS A "WOMAN PROBLEM."

THE FIRST FEMALE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STILL HAS A "WOMAN PROBLEM."

THE FIRST FEMALE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF "LE MONDE", ONE OF THE THE FIRST FEMALE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF "LE MONDE", ONE OF THE BIGGEST FRENCH NEWSPAPERS, QUIT OF "LE MONDE", ONE OF THE BIGGEST FRENCH NEWSPAPERS, QUIT AFTER MUCH CRITICISM.

BIGGEST FRENCH NEWSPAPERS, QUIT AFTER MUCH CRITICISM.

STATISTICS SHOW MEN STILL AFTER MUCH CRITICISM.

STATISTICS SHOW MEN STILL DOMINATE MOST BYLINES, STATISTICS SHOW MEN STILL DOMINATE MOST BYLINES, LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, OP-EDS, DOMINATE MOST BYLINES, LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, OP-EDS, AND SUNDAY NEWS PROGRAMS.

LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, OP-EDS, AND SUNDAY NEWS PROGRAMS.

SO, SAM BENNETT, DOES JOURNALISM AND SUNDAY NEWS PROGRAMS.

SO, SAM BENNETT, DOES JOURNALISM STILL HAVE A WOMAN PROBLEM?

SO, SAM BENNETT, DOES JOURNALISM STILL HAVE A WOMAN PROBLEM?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

STILL HAVE A WOMAN PROBLEM?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

WE ALL DRINK FROM THE SAME >> ABSOLUTELY.

WE ALL DRINK FROM THE SAME SEXIST GROUNDWATER, MEDIA WE ALL DRINK FROM THE SAME SEXIST GROUNDWATER, MEDIA INCLUDED.

SEXIST GROUNDWATER, MEDIA INCLUDED.

>> I THINK THAT THERE IS MUCH INCLUDED.

>> I THINK THAT THERE IS MUCH IMPROVEMENT THAT CAN BE MADE IN >> I THINK THAT THERE IS MUCH IMPROVEMENT THAT CAN BE MADE IN THE MEDIA, CONSIDERING THAT THE IMPROVEMENT THAT CAN BE MADE IN THE MEDIA, CONSIDERING THAT THE MEDIA IS SO-CALLED PROGRESSIVE, THE MEDIA, CONSIDERING THAT THE MEDIA IS SO-CALLED PROGRESSIVE, IT SEEMS THAT THEY'RE BEING A MEDIA IS SO-CALLED PROGRESSIVE, IT SEEMS THAT THEY'RE BEING A BIT BACKWARDS.

IT SEEMS THAT THEY'RE BEING A BIT BACKWARDS.

>> BONNIE, A PROFESSION WITH SO BIT BACKWARDS.

>> BONNIE, A PROFESSION WITH SO MANY WOMEN AT THE BOTTOM OUGHT >> BONNIE, A PROFESSION WITH SO MANY WOMEN AT THE BOTTOM OUGHT TO HAVE A LOT MORE AT THE TOP MANY WOMEN AT THE BOTTOM OUGHT TO HAVE A LOT MORE AT THE TOP RATHER THAN RECEIVING ORDERS.

TO HAVE A LOT MORE AT THE TOP RATHER THAN RECEIVING ORDERS.

>> I THINK THAT THEY DO HAVE RATHER THAN RECEIVING ORDERS.

>> I THINK THAT THEY DO HAVE WOMAN PROBLEM.

>> I THINK THAT THEY DO HAVE WOMAN PROBLEM.

UNTIL THEY BECOME EQUAL IN WOMAN PROBLEM.

UNTIL THEY BECOME EQUAL IN STATUS, WE ALWAYS GOING TO SEE UNTIL THEY BECOME EQUAL IN STATUS, WE ALWAYS GOING TO SEE THIS PROBLEM.

STATUS, WE ALWAYS GOING TO SEE THIS PROBLEM.

>> FIRST OF ALL DO WE BELIEVE THIS PROBLEM.

>> FIRST OF ALL DO WE BELIEVE THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE PAY >> FIRST OF ALL DO WE BELIEVE THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE PAY EQUITY ISSUE?

THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE PAY EQUITY ISSUE?

DO WE HAVE INFORMATION THAT IT EQUITY ISSUE?

DO WE HAVE INFORMATION THAT IT WAS SOMETHING ELSE.

DO WE HAVE INFORMATION THAT IT WAS SOMETHING ELSE.

AND WHY QUITE FRANKLY WOULD THEY WAS SOMETHING ELSE.

AND WHY QUITE FRANKLY WOULD THEY HAVE BEEN SO STUPID.

AND WHY QUITE FRANKLY WOULD THEY HAVE BEEN SO STUPID.

HAS TO BE AN IDIOT TO HAVE FIRED HAVE BEEN SO STUPID.

HAS TO BE AN IDIOT TO HAVE FIRED HER OVER THAT.

HAS TO BE AN IDIOT TO HAVE FIRED HER OVER THAT.

>> BOTTOM LINE, THE TRUTH OF THE HER OVER THAT.

>> BOTTOM LINE, THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS EVEN BEFORE THIS >> BOTTOM LINE, THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS EVEN BEFORE THIS INCIDENT THERE WAS ALL KINDS OF MATTER IS EVEN BEFORE THIS INCIDENT THERE WAS ALL KINDS OF COVERAGE OF HER CALLING HER, INCIDENT THERE WAS ALL KINDS OF COVERAGE OF HER CALLING HER, QUOTE, UNQUIET, BITCHY.

COVERAGE OF HER CALLING HER, QUOTE, UNQUIET, BITCHY.

LET'S LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE THAT QUOTE, UNQUIET, BITCHY.

LET'S LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE THAT TRAILED HER LEADERSHIP AT THE LET'S LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE THAT TRAILED HER LEADERSHIP AT THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

TRAILED HER LEADERSHIP AT THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

WIN, LOSE OR DRAW WE CAN'T "NEW YORK TIMES."

WIN, LOSE OR DRAW WE CAN'T ESCAPE THE FACT THAT WE DESCRIBE WIN, LOSE OR DRAW WE CAN'T ESCAPE THE FACT THAT WE DESCRIBE WOMEN IN SEXIST TERMS RELATIVE ESCAPE THE FACT THAT WE DESCRIBE WOMEN IN SEXIST TERMS RELATIVE TO MEN AND WHETHER SHE WAS WOMEN IN SEXIST TERMS RELATIVE TO MEN AND WHETHER SHE WAS PUSHING TO GET AN EQUAL PAY TO TO MEN AND WHETHER SHE WAS PUSHING TO GET AN EQUAL PAY TO HER MANAGING DEPUTY UNDERNEATH PUSHING TO GET AN EQUAL PAY TO HER MANAGING DEPUTY UNDERNEATH HER.

HER MANAGING DEPUTY UNDERNEATH HER.

THE POINT IS WE NEED TO HAVE HER.

THE POINT IS WE NEED TO HAVE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP BUT WE CAN'T THE POINT IS WE NEED TO HAVE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP BUT WE CAN'T AFFORD OR IGNORE THE FACT THAT WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP BUT WE CAN'T AFFORD OR IGNORE THE FACT THAT THE CULTURES ARE MALE DOMINATED, AFFORD OR IGNORE THE FACT THAT THE CULTURES ARE MALE DOMINATED, RIGHT?

THE CULTURES ARE MALE DOMINATED, RIGHT?

THAT TIME FOR THE CULTURES TO RIGHT?

THAT TIME FOR THE CULTURES TO COME UP WITH THE REALITY.

THAT TIME FOR THE CULTURES TO COME UP WITH THE REALITY.

SHE COULD VERY WELL HAVE RUBBED COME UP WITH THE REALITY.

SHE COULD VERY WELL HAVE RUBBED PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY.

SHE COULD VERY WELL HAVE RUBBED PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY.

THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, THAT PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY.

THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, THAT IN AND OF ITSELF IS SECTION.

THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, THAT IN AND OF ITSELF IS SECTION.

>> IT'S CLEARLY SOUNDED LIKE IN AND OF ITSELF IS SECTION.

>> IT'S CLEARLY SOUNDED LIKE THERE WAS A PERSONALITY CONFLICT >> IT'S CLEARLY SOUNDED LIKE THERE WAS A PERSONALITY CONFLICT FROM THE BEGINNING WITH THERE WAS A PERSONALITY CONFLICT FROM THE BEGINNING WITH SALZBURGER.

FROM THE BEGINNING WITH SALZBURGER.

WHAT WAS INTERESTING THAT SALZBURGER.

WHAT WAS INTERESTING THAT YESTERDAY DEPUTY MANAGING WHAT WAS INTERESTING THAT YESTERDAY DEPUTY MANAGING EDITOR, JANET ELDER WAS CALLED YESTERDAY DEPUTY MANAGING EDITOR, JANET ELDER WAS CALLED THE SENIOR FEMALE MANAGING EDITOR, JANET ELDER WAS CALLED THE SENIOR FEMALE MANAGING PARTNERS OF "NEW YORK TIMES," THE SENIOR FEMALE MANAGING PARTNERS OF "NEW YORK TIMES," AND SHE BASICALLY REASSERTED SHE PARTNERS OF "NEW YORK TIMES," AND SHE BASICALLY REASSERTED SHE TRIED TO GET FEEDBACK SAID, NO, AND SHE BASICALLY REASSERTED SHE TRIED TO GET FEEDBACK SAID, NO, SHE RECEIVED COMPARABLE TRIED TO GET FEEDBACK SAID, NO, SHE RECEIVED COMPARABLE COMPENSATION.

SHE RECEIVED COMPARABLE COMPENSATION.

SHE WAS KIND OF -- YOU HAVE COMPENSATION.

SHE WAS KIND OF -- YOU HAVE THESE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP THAT SHE WAS KIND OF -- YOU HAVE THESE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP THAT ARE DEFENDING SALZBURGER.

THESE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP THAT ARE DEFENDING SALZBURGER.

>> MORE TO IT THAN THAT.

ARE DEFENDING SALZBURGER.

>> MORE TO IT THAN THAT.

I CERTAINLY NOT HERE TO SAY THAT >> MORE TO IT THAN THAT.

I CERTAINLY NOT HERE TO SAY THAT WOMEN ARE PERFECT ONCE THEY I CERTAINLY NOT HERE TO SAY THAT WOMEN ARE PERFECT ONCE THEY BECOME EXECUTIVES.

WOMEN ARE PERFECT ONCE THEY BECOME EXECUTIVES.

THEY ARE HUMAN, SOME ARE BETTER BECOME EXECUTIVES.

THEY ARE HUMAN, SOME ARE BETTER DEALING WITH PEOPLE THAN OTHERS.

THEY ARE HUMAN, SOME ARE BETTER DEALING WITH PEOPLE THAN OTHERS.

LET'S LOOK AT THE PAPER.

DEALING WITH PEOPLE THAN OTHERS.

LET'S LOOK AT THE PAPER.

PAPERS ARE IN TROUBLE.

LET'S LOOK AT THE PAPER.

PAPERS ARE IN TROUBLE.

THE "NEW YORK TIMES" UNDER HER PAPERS ARE IN TROUBLE.

THE "NEW YORK TIMES" UNDER HER LEADERSHIP.

THE "NEW YORK TIMES" UNDER HER LEADERSHIP.

SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLERATED, I LEADERSHIP.

SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLERATED, I THINK IS A REAL QUESTION.

SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLERATED, I THINK IS A REAL QUESTION.

IF THE PAPER WEREN'T DOING AS THINK IS A REAL QUESTION.

IF THE PAPER WEREN'T DOING AS WELL, BUT I THINK BIG MISTAKE IF THE PAPER WEREN'T DOING AS WELL, BUT I THINK BIG MISTAKE SHE MADE, IT'S KIND OF BELOW THE WELL, BUT I THINK BIG MISTAKE SHE MADE, IT'S KIND OF BELOW THE RADAR, IS INSTEAD EVER MAKING SHE MADE, IT'S KIND OF BELOW THE RADAR, IS INSTEAD EVER MAKING THE INQUIRY ABOUT THIS DEPUTY RADAR, IS INSTEAD EVER MAKING THE INQUIRY ABOUT THIS DEPUTY WHO MAY HAVE MADE MORE, NOT THIS THE INQUIRY ABOUT THIS DEPUTY WHO MAY HAVE MADE MORE, NOT THIS PRESENT DEPUTY BUT IN CURRENT WHO MAY HAVE MADE MORE, NOT THIS PRESENT DEPUTY BUT IN CURRENT POSITION SHE HAD A LAWYER MAKE PRESENT DEPUTY BUT IN CURRENT POSITION SHE HAD A LAWYER MAKE THE INQUIRY.

POSITION SHE HAD A LAWYER MAKE THE INQUIRY.

SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE IT HERSELF THE INQUIRY.

SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE IT HERSELF AND SINCE SHE'S -- SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE IT HERSELF AND SINCE SHE'S -- >> REALLY?

AND SINCE SHE'S -- >> REALLY?

SOMETIMES I THINK -- NEED >> REALLY?

SOMETIMES I THINK -- NEED INTERMEDIARY.

SOMETIMES I THINK -- NEED INTERMEDIARY.

THIS IS WOMAN WHO LOOKED LIKE A INTERMEDIARY.

THIS IS WOMAN WHO LOOKED LIKE A REAL LEADER.

THIS IS WOMAN WHO LOOKED LIKE A REAL LEADER.

SHE CAN'T SPEAK UP FOR HERSELF REAL LEADER.

SHE CAN'T SPEAK UP FOR HERSELF AND FIND A GOOD WAY TO ASK A SHE CAN'T SPEAK UP FOR HERSELF AND FIND A GOOD WAY TO ASK A QUESTION, I WAS JUST WONDERING, AND FIND A GOOD WAY TO ASK A QUESTION, I WAS JUST WONDERING, ONLY WONDERING, HOW COME, I JUST QUESTION, I WAS JUST WONDERING, ONLY WONDERING, HOW COME, I JUST HAPPENED TO HAVE FOUND THAT OUT.

ONLY WONDERING, HOW COME, I JUST HAPPENED TO HAVE FOUND THAT OUT.

I DON'T KNOW WHY SHE COULDN'T HAPPENED TO HAVE FOUND THAT OUT.

I DON'T KNOW WHY SHE COULDN'T HAVE -- I THINK MEN WOULD NOT I DON'T KNOW WHY SHE COULDN'T HAVE -- I THINK MEN WOULD NOT HAVE GONE TO A LAWYER TO GET HAVE -- I THINK MEN WOULD NOT HAVE GONE TO A LAWYER TO GET THEM TO DO IT.

HAVE GONE TO A LAWYER TO GET THEM TO DO IT.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE REASON THEM TO DO IT.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE REASON IT HAPPENED.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE REASON IT HAPPENED.

BUT I DID NOTE THAT, I THINK IT HAPPENED.

BUT I DID NOTE THAT, I THINK THAT BROUGHT RUBBED SOME JUST BUT I DID NOTE THAT, I THINK THAT BROUGHT RUBBED SOME JUST THE WRONG WAY.

THAT BROUGHT RUBBED SOME JUST THE WRONG WAY.

>> TO AGREE WITH YOU, THE THE WRONG WAY.

>> TO AGREE WITH YOU, THE "TIMES" RECEIVED UNDER HER -- >> TO AGREE WITH YOU, THE "TIMES" RECEIVED UNDER HER -- ALSO THE FACT THAT THEY SAID "TIMES" RECEIVED UNDER HER -- ALSO THE FACT THAT THEY SAID ONLINE READERSHIP HAS INCREASED ALSO THE FACT THAT THEY SAID ONLINE READERSHIP HAS INCREASED TREMENDOUSLY.

ONLINE READERSHIP HAS INCREASED TREMENDOUSLY.

I HOPE DOESN'T HAPPEN FROM THIS TREMENDOUSLY.

I HOPE DOESN'T HAPPEN FROM THIS EPISODE WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY I HOPE DOESN'T HAPPEN FROM THIS EPISODE WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY AROUND THE WORLD BEING SEEN NOT EPISODE WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY AROUND THE WORLD BEING SEEN NOT ONLY HERE, INCIDENT IN FRANCE AROUND THE WORLD BEING SEEN NOT ONLY HERE, INCIDENT IN FRANCE THAT IT DOESN'T DISCOURAGE YOUNG ONLY HERE, INCIDENT IN FRANCE THAT IT DOESN'T DISCOURAGE YOUNG WOMEN.

THAT IT DOESN'T DISCOURAGE YOUNG WOMEN.

THAT IS MY CONCERN, THAT YOUNG WOMEN.

THAT IS MY CONCERN, THAT YOUNG WOMEN, WE NEED THE GET MORE THAT IS MY CONCERN, THAT YOUNG WOMEN, WE NEED THE GET MORE WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, SOMEONE WOMEN, WE NEED THE GET MORE WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, SOMEONE FINALLY -- WITH THE GROUND WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, SOMEONE FINALLY -- WITH THE GROUND BREAKER CITY GET WOMEN IN THE FINALLY -- WITH THE GROUND BREAKER CITY GET WOMEN IN THE LOCKER ROOM AND TO ONE EVER BREAKER CITY GET WOMEN IN THE LOCKER ROOM AND TO ONE EVER THOUGHT THAT WOULD HAPPEN.

LOCKER ROOM AND TO ONE EVER THOUGHT THAT WOULD HAPPEN.

WHAT I DO HOPE THAT COMES OUT OF THOUGHT THAT WOULD HAPPEN.

WHAT I DO HOPE THAT COMES OUT OF THIS IS THAT AS WOMEN THAT WE WHAT I DO HOPE THAT COMES OUT OF THIS IS THAT AS WOMEN THAT WE SUPPORT -- DON'T KNOW WHAT IS THIS IS THAT AS WOMEN THAT WE SUPPORT -- DON'T KNOW WHAT IS BEHIND THE SCENES.

SUPPORT -- DON'T KNOW WHAT IS BEHIND THE SCENES.

THAT WE DO ENCOURAGE OUR YOUNG BEHIND THE SCENES.

THAT WE DO ENCOURAGE OUR YOUNG WOMEN TO CONTINUE TO -- THAT WE DO ENCOURAGE OUR YOUNG WOMEN TO CONTINUE TO -- >> WHAT ABOUT JOURNALISM WOMEN TO CONTINUE TO -- >> WHAT ABOUT JOURNALISM GENERALLY.

>> WHAT ABOUT JOURNALISM GENERALLY.

AT THE WOMEN'S CAMPAIGN FUND, GENERALLY.

AT THE WOMEN'S CAMPAIGN FUND, YOU STARTED THE -- AT THE WOMEN'S CAMPAIGN FUND, YOU STARTED THE -- >> I CREATED THAT INITIATIVE IT YOU STARTED THE -- >> I CREATED THAT INITIATIVE IT OF BASED ON THE UNBELIEVABLE >> I CREATED THAT INITIATIVE IT OF BASED ON THE UNBELIEVABLE SEXIST COVERAGE THAT CAME MY WAY OF BASED ON THE UNBELIEVABLE SEXIST COVERAGE THAT CAME MY WAY WHEN I RAN FOR U.S. CONGRESS IN SEXIST COVERAGE THAT CAME MY WAY WHEN I RAN FOR U.S. CONGRESS IN 2008.

WHEN I RAN FOR U.S. CONGRESS IN 2008.

IT WAS WILD, WILD WEST.

2008.

IT WAS WILD, WILD WEST.

WE DID A LOT OF WORK WITH WOMEN IT WAS WILD, WILD WEST.

WE DID A LOT OF WORK WITH WOMEN MEDIA CENTER AROUND THAT.

WE DID A LOT OF WORK WITH WOMEN MEDIA CENTER AROUND THAT.

I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT THING MEDIA CENTER AROUND THAT.

I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT THING OF THIS INCIDENT, WE AS WOMEN, I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT THING OF THIS INCIDENT, WE AS WOMEN, THANK YOU BONNIE FOR FEATURING OF THIS INCIDENT, WE AS WOMEN, THANK YOU BONNIE FOR FEATURING THIS ON YOUR SHOW, WE NEED TOE THANK YOU BONNIE FOR FEATURING THIS ON YOUR SHOW, WE NEED TOE STAND UP AND PROTEST, CHANGE THIS ON YOUR SHOW, WE NEED TOE STAND UP AND PROTEST, CHANGE NEVER HAPPENS UNLESS IT HAS TO STAND UP AND PROTEST, CHANGE NEVER HAPPENS UNLESS IT HAS TO HAPPEN.

NEVER HAPPENS UNLESS IT HAS TO HAPPEN.

WE NEED TO MAKE THE "NEW YORK HAPPEN.

WE NEED TO MAKE THE "NEW YORK TIMES" BE VERY UNCOMFORTABLE WE NEED TO MAKE THE "NEW YORK TIMES" BE VERY UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE CHOICES -- TIMES" BE VERY UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE CHOICES -- >> CANCELLING SUBSCRIPTIONS?

WITH THE CHOICES -- >> CANCELLING SUBSCRIPTIONS?

HERE IS THE PROBLEM, FRIEND OF >> CANCELLING SUBSCRIPTIONS?

HERE IS THE PROBLEM, FRIEND OF MINE FROM ARKANSAS, I'M NOT HERE IS THE PROBLEM, FRIEND OF MINE FROM ARKANSAS, I'M NOT READING THE "TIMES" ANY MORE.

MINE FROM ARKANSAS, I'M NOT READING THE "TIMES" ANY MORE.

I THINK IT WOULD HAVE A HUGE READING THE "TIMES" ANY MORE.

I THINK IT WOULD HAVE A HUGE IMPACT, THE PROBLEM IS WHERE DO I THINK IT WOULD HAVE A HUGE IMPACT, THE PROBLEM IS WHERE DO YOU GO?

IMPACT, THE PROBLEM IS WHERE DO YOU GO?

THE REST OF AMERICAN JOURNALISM YOU GO?

THE REST OF AMERICAN JOURNALISM IS -- THE REST OF AMERICAN JOURNALISM IS -- >> BOTTOM LINE IS AS LOCK AS WE IS -- >> BOTTOM LINE IS AS LOCK AS WE AS LEADERS, EACH ONE OF THE >> BOTTOM LINE IS AS LOCK AS WE AS LEADERS, EACH ONE OF THE WOMEN IS LEADERS IN THEIR OWN AS LEADERS, EACH ONE OF THE WOMEN IS LEADERS IN THEIR OWN AREAS OF EXPERTISE, STAND UP AND WOMEN IS LEADERS IN THEIR OWN AREAS OF EXPERTISE, STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT IN THE ARENA OF IDEAS.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE, STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT IN THE ARENA OF IDEAS.

IF THE "NEW YORK TIMES" GET SPEAK OUT IN THE ARENA OF IDEAS.

IF THE "NEW YORK TIMES" GET THEIR HAND SLAPPED ENOUGH THAT'S IF THE "NEW YORK TIMES" GET THEIR HAND SLAPPED ENOUGH THAT'S HOW CHANGE HAPPENS.

THEIR HAND SLAPPED ENOUGH THAT'S HOW CHANGE HAPPENS.

>> IT TAKES MORE THAN THAT.

HOW CHANGE HAPPENS.

>> IT TAKES MORE THAN THAT.

THEY'RE GETTING VERY BAD -- >> IT TAKES MORE THAN THAT.

THEY'RE GETTING VERY BAD -- NEGATIVE COVERAGE.

THEY'RE GETTING VERY BAD -- NEGATIVE COVERAGE.

REALLY IT'S THE INSTITUTIONS, NEGATIVE COVERAGE.

REALLY IT'S THE INSTITUTIONS, THESE ORGANIZATIONS THAT WITHIN REALLY IT'S THE INSTITUTIONS, THESE ORGANIZATIONS THAT WITHIN NEED TO HAVE MENTORS FOR THESE THESE ORGANIZATIONS THAT WITHIN NEED TO HAVE MENTORS FOR THESE WOMEN SO THAT THEY'RE GETTING NEED TO HAVE MENTORS FOR THESE WOMEN SO THAT THEY'RE GETTING THE TRAINING THAT THEY NEED.

WOMEN SO THAT THEY'RE GETTING THE TRAINING THAT THEY NEED.

GET THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY THE TRAINING THAT THEY NEED.

GET THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY NEED IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE -- GET THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY NEED IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE -- >> SHE WAS NOT A LIFE LONG NEED IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE -- >> SHE WAS NOT A LIFE LONG "TIMES" PERSON, SHE CAME IN FROM >> SHE WAS NOT A LIFE LONG "TIMES" PERSON, SHE CAME IN FROM OUTSIDE.

"TIMES" PERSON, SHE CAME IN FROM OUTSIDE.

HER STYLE WAS WELL-KNOWN.

OUTSIDE.

HER STYLE WAS WELL-KNOWN.

>> AND BY THE WAY, I NEVER MET HER STYLE WAS WELL-KNOWN.

>> AND BY THE WAY, I NEVER MET HER BUT AFTER SHE GOT THE >> AND BY THE WAY, I NEVER MET HER BUT AFTER SHE GOT THE "TIMES" JOB WE MADE AN INQUIRY HER BUT AFTER SHE GOT THE "TIMES" JOB WE MADE AN INQUIRY ABOUT GET KNOWLEDGE TAN "TIMES" JOB WE MADE AN INQUIRY ABOUT GET KNOWLEDGE TAN INTERVIEW WITH HER.

ABOUT GET KNOWLEDGE TAN INTERVIEW WITH HER.

WE GOT BACK FROM AN ASSISTANT A INTERVIEW WITH HER.

WE GOT BACK FROM AN ASSISTANT A VERY NICE NO, I SAW NO DRUGNESS WE GOT BACK FROM AN ASSISTANT A VERY NICE NO, I SAW NO DRUGNESS THERE.

VERY NICE NO, I SAW NO DRUGNESS THERE.

>> YOU ASK A VERY IMPORTANT THERE.

>> YOU ASK A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION.

>> YOU ASK A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION.

WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, QUESTION.

WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, PERIOD.

WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN JOURNALISM, PERIOD.

WE LOOK AT THE TOP, THE RECORD PERIOD.

WE LOOK AT THE TOP, THE RECORD OF THE WORLD.

WE LOOK AT THE TOP, THE RECORD OF THE WORLD.

BUT THIS PROFESSION AT THE TIME OF THE WORLD.

BUT THIS PROFESSION AT THE TIME THAT YOU BECAME A JOURNALIST, BUT THIS PROFESSION AT THE TIME THAT YOU BECAME A JOURNALIST, HAS ATTRACTED WOMEN.

THAT YOU BECAME A JOURNALIST, HAS ATTRACTED WOMEN.

WHY HAS IT BEEN SO DIFFICULT HAS ATTRACTED WOMEN.

WHY HAS IT BEEN SO DIFFICULT GIVEN THE FACT THAT FOR, I WOULD WHY HAS IT BEEN SO DIFFICULT GIVEN THE FACT THAT FOR, I WOULD SAY A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS NOW, GIVEN THE FACT THAT FOR, I WOULD SAY A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS NOW, WOMEN HAVE BEEN IN JOURNALISM SAY A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS NOW, WOMEN HAVE BEEN IN JOURNALISM DOING TOUGH WORK, WINNING PRIZES WOMEN HAVE BEEN IN JOURNALISM DOING TOUGH WORK, WINNING PRIZES YET YOU DON'T -- DOING TOUGH WORK, WINNING PRIZES YET YOU DON'T -- >> OR LOOK AT LAW SCHOOL.

YET YOU DON'T -- >> OR LOOK AT LAW SCHOOL.

>> WAIT A MINUTE, I'M MAKING >> OR LOOK AT LAW SCHOOL.

>> WAIT A MINUTE, I'M MAKING MUCH MORE IMPORTANT POINT THAN >> WAIT A MINUTE, I'M MAKING MUCH MORE IMPORTANT POINT THAN THAT.

MUCH MORE IMPORTANT POINT THAN THAT.

THE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN THE FIELD THAT.

THE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN THE FIELD IS SUCH THAT YOU WOULD HAVE THE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN THE FIELD IS SUCH THAT YOU WOULD HAVE EXPECTED THEM TO RISE THROUGH IS SUCH THAT YOU WOULD HAVE EXPECTED THEM TO RISE THROUGH THE RANKS IN THE ORDINARY -- EXPECTED THEM TO RISE THROUGH THE RANKS IN THE ORDINARY -- >> ALL DUE RESPECT, IF WE LOOK A THE RANKS IN THE ORDINARY -- >> ALL DUE RESPECT, IF WE LOOK A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT FIELDS, LAW >> ALL DUE RESPECT, IF WE LOOK A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT FIELDS, LAW SCHOOLING, ARE GRADUATING MORE NUMBER OF DIFFERENT FIELDS, LAW SCHOOLING, ARE GRADUATING MORE WOMEN THAN MEN.

SCHOOLING, ARE GRADUATING MORE WOMEN THAN MEN.

THE 15% THAT ARE PARTNERS HELD WOMEN THAN MEN.

THE 15% THAT ARE PARTNERS HELD STEADY FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS.

THE 15% THAT ARE PARTNERS HELD STEADY FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS.

IF WE LOOK AT PRE FIXES LIKE STEADY FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS.

IF WE LOOK AT PRE FIXES LIKE BANKING, BANKING IS IF WE LOOK AT PRE FIXES LIKE BANKING, BANKING IS OVERWHELMINGLY WOMEN.

BANKING, BANKING IS OVERWHELMINGLY WOMEN.

TELLERS AND ALL THAT.

OVERWHELMINGLY WOMEN.

TELLERS AND ALL THAT.

SAME PHENOMENON.

TELLERS AND ALL THAT.

SAME PHENOMENON.

>> THEY BECOME BANK PRESIDENTS.

SAME PHENOMENON.

>> THEY BECOME BANK PRESIDENTS.

>> 7% OF THE LEADERSHIP OF THE >> THEY BECOME BANK PRESIDENTS.

>> 7% OF THE LEADERSHIP OF THE BANKING INDUSTRY IS THE SAME.

>> 7% OF THE LEADERSHIP OF THE BANKING INDUSTRY IS THE SAME.

MEDIA IS AHEAD OF THE PACK WITH BANKING INDUSTRY IS THE SAME.

MEDIA IS AHEAD OF THE PACK WITH 4% OF THE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP.

MEDIA IS AHEAD OF THE PACK WITH 4% OF THE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP.

ALL I'M SAYING HERE IS THIS IS A 4% OF THE WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP.

ALL I'M SAYING HERE IS THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM, IT'S A CULTURAL ALL I'M SAYING HERE IS THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM, IT'S A CULTURAL PROBLEM.

BIG PROBLEM, IT'S A CULTURAL PROBLEM.

IT'S GOING TO TAKE TIME.

PROBLEM.

IT'S GOING TO TAKE TIME.

BUT AS LONG AS WE ALL STAND UP IT'S GOING TO TAKE TIME.

BUT AS LONG AS WE ALL STAND UP AND TALK ABOUT IT WE MOVE IT BUT AS LONG AS WE ALL STAND UP AND TALK ABOUT IT WE MOVE IT FORWARD.

AND TALK ABOUT IT WE MOVE IT FORWARD.

NO ONE MAKES CHANGE UNLESS THEY FORWARD.

NO ONE MAKES CHANGE UNLESS THEY HAVE.

NO ONE MAKES CHANGE UNLESS THEY HAVE.

TO HAVE.

TO >> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

TO >> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER >> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.

FROM FEMALE JOURNALISTS TO @BONNIEERBE.

FROM FEMALE JOURNALISTS TO FEMALE REPUBLICANS.

FROM FEMALE JOURNALISTS TO FEMALE REPUBLICANS.

WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICAN WOMEN?

FEMALE REPUBLICANS.

WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICAN WOMEN?

DESPITE GOP EFFORTS TO REMEDIATE WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICAN WOMEN?

DESPITE GOP EFFORTS TO REMEDIATE THE PARTY'S SO-CALLED WOMAN DESPITE GOP EFFORTS TO REMEDIATE THE PARTY'S SO-CALLED WOMAN PROBLEM, THERE'S NOT ONE NOT ONE THE PARTY'S SO-CALLED WOMAN PROBLEM, THERE'S NOT ONE NOT ONE WOMAN POLLING IN THE TOP 10 PROBLEM, THERE'S NOT ONE NOT ONE WOMAN POLLING IN THE TOP 10 POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR THE WOMAN POLLING IN THE TOP 10 POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION.

REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION.

WHEN MITT ROMNEY RECENTLY LISTED NOMINATION.

WHEN MITT ROMNEY RECENTLY LISTED HIS "FAVORITE" PRESIDENTIAL WHEN MITT ROMNEY RECENTLY LISTED HIS "FAVORITE" PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS FOR 2016 HE NAMED FIVE HIS "FAVORITE" PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS FOR 2016 HE NAMED FIVE MEN BEFORE ADDING, "HOPEFULLY HOPEFULS FOR 2016 HE NAMED FIVE MEN BEFORE ADDING, "HOPEFULLY SOME WOMEN AS WELL."

MEN BEFORE ADDING, "HOPEFULLY SOME WOMEN AS WELL."

WHEN PRESSED HE POINTED TO NEW SOME WOMEN AS WELL."

WHEN PRESSED HE POINTED TO NEW MEXICO GOVERNOR SUSANA MARTINEZ.

WHEN PRESSED HE POINTED TO NEW MEXICO GOVERNOR SUSANA MARTINEZ.

THE GOP LAGS BEHIND THE MEXICO GOVERNOR SUSANA MARTINEZ.

THE GOP LAGS BEHIND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN RECRUITING THE GOP LAGS BEHIND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN RECRUITING FEMALE CANDIDATES AT ALL LEVELS DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN RECRUITING FEMALE CANDIDATES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT.

FEMALE CANDIDATES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT.

IN THE SENATE, FEMALE DEMOCRATS OF GOVERNMENT.

IN THE SENATE, FEMALE DEMOCRATS OUTNUMBER THEIR GOP COUNTERPARTS IN THE SENATE, FEMALE DEMOCRATS OUTNUMBER THEIR GOP COUNTERPARTS BY MORE THAN THREE TO ONE.

OUTNUMBER THEIR GOP COUNTERPARTS BY MORE THAN THREE TO ONE.

ONE WOMAN WHO WANTS TO CHANGE BY MORE THAN THREE TO ONE.

ONE WOMAN WHO WANTS TO CHANGE THAT RATIO IS REPUBLICAN ONE WOMAN WHO WANTS TO CHANGE THAT RATIO IS REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE SHELLEY MOORE THAT RATIO IS REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO.

REPRESENTATIVE SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO.

SHE WON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CAPITO.

SHE WON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY FOR WEST VIRGINIA'S OPEN SENATE SHE WON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY FOR WEST VIRGINIA'S OPEN SENATE SEAT.

FOR WEST VIRGINIA'S OPEN SENATE SEAT.

DEMOCRATIC SECRETARY OF STATE SEAT.

DEMOCRATIC SECRETARY OF STATE NATALIE TENNANT WON HER PARTY'S DEMOCRATIC SECRETARY OF STATE NATALIE TENNANT WON HER PARTY'S PRIMARY, GUARANTEEING THE STATE NATALIE TENNANT WON HER PARTY'S PRIMARY, GUARANTEEING THE STATE WILL HAVE ITS FIRST FEMALE PRIMARY, GUARANTEEING THE STATE WILL HAVE ITS FIRST FEMALE SENATOR.

WILL HAVE ITS FIRST FEMALE SENATOR.

TO WASHINGTON.

SENATOR.

TO WASHINGTON.

SO, MERCY, AS A REPUBLICAN, WHAT TO WASHINGTON.

SO, MERCY, AS A REPUBLICAN, WHAT SIT ABOUT THE PARTY THAT IS SO, MERCY, AS A REPUBLICAN, WHAT SIT ABOUT THE PARTY THAT IS ATTRACTING FEWER WOMEN?

SIT ABOUT THE PARTY THAT IS ATTRACTING FEWER WOMEN?

IS IT THE PARTY PLATFORM?

ATTRACTING FEWER WOMEN?

IS IT THE PARTY PLATFORM?

I MEAN, DEMOCRATS HAVE THE -- IS IT THE PARTY PLATFORM?

I MEAN, DEMOCRATS HAVE THE -- I'M SORRY, THE FEMALE AND I MEAN, DEMOCRATS HAVE THE -- I'M SORRY, THE FEMALE AND MINORITY VOTE AND REPUBLICANS I'M SORRY, THE FEMALE AND MINORITY VOTE AND REPUBLICANS ARE LARGELY WHITE MALES.

MINORITY VOTE AND REPUBLICANS ARE LARGELY WHITE MALES.

IS IT JUST THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING ARE LARGELY WHITE MALES.

IS IT JUST THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO ATTRACT ENOUGH IS IT JUST THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO ATTRACT ENOUGH WOMEN TO BE AT PARODY WITH THE TO BE ABLE TO ATTRACT ENOUGH WOMEN TO BE AT PARODY WITH THE DEMOCRATS?

WOMEN TO BE AT PARODY WITH THE DEMOCRATS?

>> WE HAVE PLENTY OF INCREDIBLY DEMOCRATS?

>> WE HAVE PLENTY OF INCREDIBLY TALENTED WOMEN, A LOT OF THEM >> WE HAVE PLENTY OF INCREDIBLY TALENTED WOMEN, A LOT OF THEM THAT ARE IN THE STATE TALENTED WOMEN, A LOT OF THEM THAT ARE IN THE STATE LEGISLATOR, CITY COUNCIL, SCHOOL THAT ARE IN THE STATE LEGISLATOR, CITY COUNCIL, SCHOOL BOARD, WE NEED A LOT MORE TO GET LEGISLATOR, CITY COUNCIL, SCHOOL BOARD, WE NEED A LOT MORE TO GET THEM UP THE RANK WHICH IS BOARD, WE NEED A LOT MORE TO GET THEM UP THE RANK WHICH IS THROUGH TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT THEM UP THE RANK WHICH IS THROUGH TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT WHICH I THINK THERE IS THROUGH TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT WHICH I THINK THERE IS DEFINITELY ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT WHICH I THINK THERE IS DEFINITELY ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE G.O.P.

TO DO THAT.

DEFINITELY ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE G.O.P.

TO DO THAT.

IT STARTS EVEN WITH THE IN THE G.O.P.

TO DO THAT.

IT STARTS EVEN WITH THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE IT STARTS EVEN WITH THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND MAKING SURE THAT THESE WOMEN REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND MAKING SURE THAT THESE WOMEN HAVE THE RESOURCES.

AND MAKING SURE THAT THESE WOMEN HAVE THE RESOURCES.

WE SAW IN 2010 THAT THEY WERE HAVE THE RESOURCES.

WE SAW IN 2010 THAT THEY WERE SAYING IT WAS YEAR OF THE WOMAN WE SAW IN 2010 THAT THEY WERE SAYING IT WAS YEAR OF THE WOMAN THAT MORE REPUBLICAN WOMEN SIGN SAYING IT WAS YEAR OF THE WOMAN THAT MORE REPUBLICAN WOMEN SIGN UP TO RUN BASICALLY, OVER 200 THAT MORE REPUBLICAN WOMEN SIGN UP TO RUN BASICALLY, OVER 200 WOMEN THAT DECIDED TO RUN FOR UP TO RUN BASICALLY, OVER 200 WOMEN THAT DECIDED TO RUN FOR THE HOUSE SEATS IN THE SENATE WOMEN THAT DECIDED TO RUN FOR THE HOUSE SEATS IN THE SENATE SEATS.

THE HOUSE SEATS IN THE SENATE SEATS.

THIS YEAR IT'S KIND EVER QUIET SEATS.

THIS YEAR IT'S KIND EVER QUIET WHICH IS UNNERVING.

THIS YEAR IT'S KIND EVER QUIET WHICH IS UNNERVING.

WE NEED TO HAVE THESE WOMEN WHICH IS UNNERVING.

WE NEED TO HAVE THESE WOMEN GETTING THE RESOURCES THAT THEY WE NEED TO HAVE THESE WOMEN GETTING THE RESOURCES THAT THEY NEED TO WIN THESE PRIMARIES.

GETTING THE RESOURCES THAT THEY NEED TO WIN THESE PRIMARIES.

THE PROBLEM IS THEY'RE NOT NEED TO WIN THESE PRIMARIES.

THE PROBLEM IS THEY'RE NOT GETTING THROUGH THE PRIMARY THE PROBLEM IS THEY'RE NOT GETTING THROUGH THE PRIMARY PROCESS.

GETTING THROUGH THE PRIMARY PROCESS.

>> I COVERED EVERY NATIONAL PROCESS.

>> I COVERED EVERY NATIONAL CONVENTION FROM 1976 UNTIL ABOUT >> I COVERED EVERY NATIONAL CONVENTION FROM 1976 UNTIL ABOUT 2012.

CONVENTION FROM 1976 UNTIL ABOUT 2012.

AND -- I'M SORRY, 2008, I DIDN'T 2012.

AND -- I'M SORRY, 2008, I DIDN'T GO IN 2012.

AND -- I'M SORRY, 2008, I DIDN'T GO IN 2012.

I HAVE TO SAY THAT WHEN I USED GO IN 2012.

I HAVE TO SAY THAT WHEN I USED TO COVER EARLY ON THE REPUBLICAN I HAVE TO SAY THAT WHEN I USED TO COVER EARLY ON THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTIONS THEY ALWAYS HAD A TO COVER EARLY ON THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTIONS THEY ALWAYS HAD A STRONG CONTINGENT OF ALMOST CONVENTIONS THEY ALWAYS HAD A STRONG CONTINGENT OF ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY FEMALE, VERY STRONG CONTINGENT OF ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY FEMALE, VERY WEALTHY, VERY INTELLIGENT, VERY EXCLUSIVELY FEMALE, VERY WEALTHY, VERY INTELLIGENT, VERY ACCOMPLISHED PRO CHOICE WEALTHY, VERY INTELLIGENT, VERY ACCOMPLISHED PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN WOMEN.

ACCOMPLISHED PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN WOMEN.

THAT IS GONE.

REPUBLICAN WOMEN.

THAT IS GONE.

IT WAS GONE 15 YEARS AGO.

THAT IS GONE.

IT WAS GONE 15 YEARS AGO.

>> LIKE IN THE DEMOCRAT -- IT WAS GONE 15 YEARS AGO.

>> LIKE IN THE DEMOCRAT -- >> AND THE PRO LIFE -- >> LIKE IN THE DEMOCRAT -- >> AND THE PRO LIFE -- >> BUT YOU KNOW -- >> AND THE PRO LIFE -- >> BUT YOU KNOW -- >> WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE >> BUT YOU KNOW -- >> WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE PARTY IS -- >> WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE PARTY IS -- >> IT OUGHT TO BE.

PARTY IS -- >> IT OUGHT TO BE.

WHEN RONALD REAGAN WAS PRESIDENT >> IT OUGHT TO BE.

WHEN RONALD REAGAN WAS PRESIDENT YOU HAD EQUAL NUMBER OF WOMEN IN WHEN RONALD REAGAN WAS PRESIDENT YOU HAD EQUAL NUMBER OF WOMEN IN BOTH PARTIES.

YOU HAD EQUAL NUMBER OF WOMEN IN BOTH PARTIES.

YOU HAVE -- EMBARRASSING TO THE BOTH PARTIES.

YOU HAVE -- EMBARRASSING TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

YOU HAVE -- EMBARRASSING TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

YOU TALK ABOUT RIGHTLY GOING TO REPUBLICAN PARTY.

YOU TALK ABOUT RIGHTLY GOING TO THE REPUBLICAN LEGISLATION IS YOU TALK ABOUT RIGHTLY GOING TO THE REPUBLICAN LEGISLATION IS WOMEN THAT'S THE WAY THEY GOT TO THE REPUBLICAN LEGISLATION IS WOMEN THAT'S THE WAY THEY GOT TO COME.

WOMEN THAT'S THE WAY THEY GOT TO COME.

WE CAN'T LOOK THERE.

COME.

WE CAN'T LOOK THERE.

I THINK THAT THE REPUBLICANS WE CAN'T LOOK THERE.

I THINK THAT THE REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED TO BE -- THEY HAVE I THINK THAT THE REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED TO BE -- THEY HAVE NOT GOT THE KIND -- THEY HAVE A HAVE TRIED TO BE -- THEY HAVE NOT GOT THE KIND -- THEY HAVE A STRUCTURAL PROBLEM.

NOT GOT THE KIND -- THEY HAVE A STRUCTURAL PROBLEM.

NOT GOT THE KIND OF PARTY THAT STRUCTURAL PROBLEM.

NOT GOT THE KIND OF PARTY THAT THEY CAN RUN AS A WOMAN.

NOT GOT THE KIND OF PARTY THAT THEY CAN RUN AS A WOMAN.

THOUGH WILL BE FACED WITH THESE THEY CAN RUN AS A WOMAN.

THOUGH WILL BE FACED WITH THESE WOMEN ISSUES THEY DON'T HAVE A THOUGH WILL BE FACED WITH THESE WOMEN ISSUES THEY DON'T HAVE A COMEBACK ON THESE WOMEN'S WOMEN ISSUES THEY DON'T HAVE A COMEBACK ON THESE WOMEN'S ISSUES.

COMEBACK ON THESE WOMEN'S ISSUES.

>> YOUR THOUGHTS AS -- YOU ARE ISSUES.

>> YOUR THOUGHTS AS -- YOU ARE IN THE FIELD.

>> YOUR THOUGHTS AS -- YOU ARE IN THE FIELD.

>> I BELIEVE VERY PASSIONATELY IN THE FIELD.

>> I BELIEVE VERY PASSIONATELY THAT WE NEED WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES >> I BELIEVE VERY PASSIONATELY THAT WE NEED WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE IRRESPECTIVE OF THAT WE NEED WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE IRRESPECTIVE OF VALUE SETS.

OF THE AISLE IRRESPECTIVE OF VALUE SETS.

THERE IS -- BIG YAWNING VALUE SETS.

THERE IS -- BIG YAWNING DIFFERENCE, CRITICAL ISSUE IS THERE IS -- BIG YAWNING DIFFERENCE, CRITICAL ISSUE IS EVER GROWING CHASM, THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, CRITICAL ISSUE IS EVER GROWING CHASM, THAT'S THE PROBLEM.

EVER GROWING CHASM, THAT'S THE PROBLEM.

THERE IS ALWAYS BEEN MORE PROBLEM.

THERE IS ALWAYS BEEN MORE DEMOCRATIC WOMEN, LARGELY MORE.

THERE IS ALWAYS BEEN MORE DEMOCRATIC WOMEN, LARGELY MORE.

NOW IT'S THIS YAWNING CHASM, DEMOCRATIC WOMEN, LARGELY MORE.

NOW IT'S THIS YAWNING CHASM, EXPONENTIAL GROWTH IN NUMBER OF NOW IT'S THIS YAWNING CHASM, EXPONENTIAL GROWTH IN NUMBER OF DIFFERENT M. PUNDITS SAY THAT EXPONENTIAL GROWTH IN NUMBER OF DIFFERENT M. PUNDITS SAY THAT THE DEMOCRATIC EDGE WAS CHANGED DIFFERENT M. PUNDITS SAY THAT THE DEMOCRATIC EDGE WAS CHANGED WHEN THEY CHANGEDDER THIS PARTY THE DEMOCRATIC EDGE WAS CHANGED WHEN THEY CHANGEDDER THIS PARTY OPERATING SYSTEMS YOU ALWAYS WHEN THEY CHANGEDDER THIS PARTY OPERATING SYSTEMS YOU ALWAYS HAD -- IF YOU HAD MALE CHOIR, I OPERATING SYSTEMS YOU ALWAYS HAD -- IF YOU HAD MALE CHOIR, I WAS THE CHAIR OF MY DEMOCRATIC HAD -- IF YOU HAD MALE CHOIR, I WAS THE CHAIR OF MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY YOU HAD TOFFEE MAIL WAS THE CHAIR OF MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY YOU HAD TOFFEE MAIL COUNTERPART.

PARTY YOU HAD TOFFEE MAIL COUNTERPART.

SOME ATTRIBUTE THAT ONE THING TO COUNTERPART.

SOME ATTRIBUTE THAT ONE THING TO THIS EVER -- BECAUSE YOU HAVE SOME ATTRIBUTE THAT ONE THING TO THIS EVER -- BECAUSE YOU HAVE THESE WOMEN IN THE PIPELINE THAT THIS EVER -- BECAUSE YOU HAVE THESE WOMEN IN THE PIPELINE THAT SERVED IN LEADERSHIP AND THESE WOMEN IN THE PIPELINE THAT SERVED IN LEADERSHIP AND SYSTEMIC STRUCTURED RANK.

SERVED IN LEADERSHIP AND SYSTEMIC STRUCTURED RANK.

THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK IS SYSTEMIC STRUCTURED RANK.

THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT WE NEED TO LOOK THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE OUTCOME OF THE CHASM.

VERY IMPORTANT WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE OUTCOME OF THE CHASM.

EVEN THOUGH MORE DEMOCRATIC AT THE OUTCOME OF THE CHASM.

EVEN THOUGH MORE DEMOCRATIC WOMEN WERE ELECTED THAN EVER EVEN THOUGH MORE DEMOCRATIC WOMEN WERE ELECTED THAN EVER BEFORE SERVING, THERE'S ALWAYS WOMEN WERE ELECTED THAN EVER BEFORE SERVING, THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN A COMMENSURATE DECREASE IN BEFORE SERVING, THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN A COMMENSURATE DECREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN BEEN A COMMENSURATE DECREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN SERVING.

THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN SERVING.

WHAT IS THE OUTCOME OF THAT?

SERVING.

WHAT IS THE OUTCOME OF THAT?

MORE CHALLENGES TO WOMEN'S WHAT IS THE OUTCOME OF THAT?

MORE CHALLENGES TO WOMEN'S RIGHTS ACROSS THE BOARD THAN MORE CHALLENGES TO WOMEN'S RIGHTS ACROSS THE BOARD THAN WE'VE EVER SEEN IN OUR NATION'S RIGHTS ACROSS THE BOARD THAN WE'VE EVER SEEN IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY, PERIOD.

WE'VE EVER SEEN IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY, PERIOD.

>> REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS.

HISTORY, PERIOD.

>> REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS.

>> ALL RIGHTS.

>> REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS.

>> ALL RIGHTS.

IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT >> ALL RIGHTS.

IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT FAMILY, THE WHOLE NINE YARDS, IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT FAMILY, THE WHOLE NINE YARDS, IT'S ALL BEEN EMBATTLED.

FAMILY, THE WHOLE NINE YARDS, IT'S ALL BEEN EMBATTLED.

WHY?

IT'S ALL BEEN EMBATTLED.

WHY?

WE DON'T HAVE THE CRITICAL WHY?

WE DON'T HAVE THE CRITICAL WOMAN'S VOICE.

WE DON'T HAVE THE CRITICAL WOMAN'S VOICE.

I WOULD SAY, ALL OF US AS WOMEN WOMAN'S VOICE.

I WOULD SAY, ALL OF US AS WOMEN NEED TO BE ENCOURAGING EVERY I WOULD SAY, ALL OF US AS WOMEN NEED TO BE ENCOURAGING EVERY TALENTED WOMAN WE KNOW TO RUN.

NEED TO BE ENCOURAGING EVERY TALENTED WOMAN WE KNOW TO RUN.

DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE'S TALENTED WOMAN WE KNOW TO RUN.

DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE'S REPUBLICAN, DOESN'T MATTER WHAT DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE'S REPUBLICAN, DOESN'T MATTER WHAT HER VALUE SET IS JUST NEED MORE REPUBLICAN, DOESN'T MATTER WHAT HER VALUE SET IS JUST NEED MORE WOMEN, PERIOD.

HER VALUE SET IS JUST NEED MORE WOMEN, PERIOD.

>> SPEAKING EVER WOMEN RUNNING I WOMEN, PERIOD.

>> SPEAKING EVER WOMEN RUNNING I HAVE TO USE LAST COUPLE OF >> SPEAKING EVER WOMEN RUNNING I HAVE TO USE LAST COUPLE OF MINUTES IN THIS SEGMENT TO ASK HAVE TO USE LAST COUPLE OF MINUTES IN THIS SEGMENT TO ASK YOU GUYS ABOUT THE KARL ROVE MINUTES IN THIS SEGMENT TO ASK YOU GUYS ABOUT THE KARL ROVE COMMENT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON YOU GUYS ABOUT THE KARL ROVE COMMENT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON AND WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE.

COMMENT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON AND WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE.

>> DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT AND WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE.

>> DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT OR -- >> DO YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT OR -- [ LAUGHTER ] OR -- [ LAUGHTER ] >> YOU KNOW, I RESPECT KARL ROVE [ LAUGHTER ] >> YOU KNOW, I RESPECT KARL ROVE GREATLY BUT THAT WAS JUST A >> YOU KNOW, I RESPECT KARL ROVE GREATLY BUT THAT WAS JUST A WRONG STATEMENT, PERIOD.

GREATLY BUT THAT WAS JUST A WRONG STATEMENT, PERIOD.

IT JUST GIVES AMMUNITION TO THE WRONG STATEMENT, PERIOD.

IT JUST GIVES AMMUNITION TO THE OTHER SIDE.

IT JUST GIVES AMMUNITION TO THE OTHER SIDE.

CLEARLY YOU JUST DON'T GO SAY OTHER SIDE.

CLEARLY YOU JUST DON'T GO SAY THAT SOMEONE MAY HAVE BRAIN CLEARLY YOU JUST DON'T GO SAY THAT SOMEONE MAY HAVE BRAIN DAMAGE.

THAT SOMEONE MAY HAVE BRAIN DAMAGE.

THAT IS JUST NOT A SMART DAMAGE.

THAT IS JUST NOT A SMART POLITICAL STATEMENT TO MAKE.

THAT IS JUST NOT A SMART POLITICAL STATEMENT TO MAKE.

HILLARY CLINTON, THAT IS A VERY POLITICAL STATEMENT TO MAKE.

HILLARY CLINTON, THAT IS A VERY PERSONAL DECISION.

HILLARY CLINTON, THAT IS A VERY PERSONAL DECISION.

>> WAS IT EFFECTIVE, DO YOU PERSONAL DECISION.

>> WAS IT EFFECTIVE, DO YOU BELIEVE?

>> WAS IT EFFECTIVE, DO YOU BELIEVE?

>> I THINK MORE AGE RELATED, BELIEVE?

>> I THINK MORE AGE RELATED, WHICH I THINK -- >> I THINK MORE AGE RELATED, WHICH I THINK -- >> IT WAS AGEIST.

WHICH I THINK -- >> IT WAS AGEIST.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> IT WAS AGEIST.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> REASON IS BECAUSE WE'VE HAD >> ABSOLUTELY.

>> REASON IS BECAUSE WE'VE HAD MEN IN OFFICE WITH MUCH MORE >> REASON IS BECAUSE WE'VE HAD MEN IN OFFICE WITH MUCH MORE SERIOUS -- MEN IN OFFICE WITH MUCH MORE SERIOUS -- >> RONALD REAGAN, ANYBODY?

SERIOUS -- >> RONALD REAGAN, ANYBODY?

>> I'M NOT SURE -- >> RONALD REAGAN, ANYBODY?

>> I'M NOT SURE -- >> THAT WAS MORE AT THE END.

>> I'M NOT SURE -- >> THAT WAS MORE AT THE END.

BUT LIKE FDR WOULD HAVE BEEN A >> THAT WAS MORE AT THE END.

BUT LIKE FDR WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECT EXAMPLE.

BUT LIKE FDR WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECT EXAMPLE.

>> THAT WAS A DIFFERENT ERA.

PERFECT EXAMPLE.

>> THAT WAS A DIFFERENT ERA.

>> I'M NOT -- >> THAT WAS A DIFFERENT ERA.

>> I'M NOT -- >> NOTHING WAS REPORTED BACK >> I'M NOT -- >> NOTHING WAS REPORTED BACK THEN.

>> NOTHING WAS REPORTED BACK THEN.

>> THAT'S WHAT FRUSTRATES ME THEN.

>> THAT'S WHAT FRUSTRATES ME ABOUT THE PARTY IN GENERAL.

>> THAT'S WHAT FRUSTRATES ME ABOUT THE PARTY IN GENERAL.

SOMETIMES, ESPECIALLY SOME OF ABOUT THE PARTY IN GENERAL.

SOMETIMES, ESPECIALLY SOME OF OUR MEN THEY SPEAK WITH SOMETIMES, ESPECIALLY SOME OF OUR MEN THEY SPEAK WITH CERTAIN -- IT'S AN ISSUE.

OUR MEN THEY SPEAK WITH CERTAIN -- IT'S AN ISSUE.

MAY BE A TURN OFF TO SOME WOMEN, CERTAIN -- IT'S AN ISSUE.

MAY BE A TURN OFF TO SOME WOMEN, TOO.

MAY BE A TURN OFF TO SOME WOMEN, TOO.

I THINK IF WE GET A BETTER TOO.

I THINK IF WE GET A BETTER REPRESENTATION OF MORE WOMEN AND I THINK IF WE GET A BETTER REPRESENTATION OF MORE WOMEN AND MORE MEN WHO ARE A LITTLE BIT REPRESENTATION OF MORE WOMEN AND MORE MEN WHO ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE UNDERSTANDING IN THEIR MORE MEN WHO ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE UNDERSTANDING IN THEIR LANGUAGE HOW THEY ADDRESS MORE UNDERSTANDING IN THEIR LANGUAGE HOW THEY ADDRESS THINGS, WE MIGHT GET -- LANGUAGE HOW THEY ADDRESS THINGS, WE MIGHT GET -- >> QUICKLY, DOES THIS SHOW, THINGS, WE MIGHT GET -- >> QUICKLY, DOES THIS SHOW, WE'RE ALMOST OUT OF TIME DOES IT >> QUICKLY, DOES THIS SHOW, WE'RE ALMOST OUT OF TIME DOES IT SHOW HOW PETRIFIED THE WE'RE ALMOST OUT OF TIME DOES IT SHOW HOW PETRIFIED THE REPUBLICANS ARE OF HILLARY SHOW HOW PETRIFIED THE REPUBLICANS ARE OF HILLARY CLINTON?

REPUBLICANS ARE OF HILLARY CLINTON?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

CLINTON?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

BUT I THINK THEY ARE AWARE THAT >> ABSOLUTELY.

BUT I THINK THEY ARE AWARE THAT THERE IS SORT OF WOMAN PROBLEM BUT I THINK THEY ARE AWARE THAT THERE IS SORT OF WOMAN PROBLEM WITHIN THE PARTY.

THERE IS SORT OF WOMAN PROBLEM WITHIN THE PARTY.

THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, WITHIN THE PARTY.

THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, HOWEVER, BOTH PARTIES BUT -- ALL THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, HOWEVER, BOTH PARTIES BUT -- ALL NEED TO BE IN THE BUSINESS OF HOWEVER, BOTH PARTIES BUT -- ALL NEED TO BE IN THE BUSINESS OF RECRUITING WOMEN, ASKING THEM TO NEED TO BE IN THE BUSINESS OF RECRUITING WOMEN, ASKING THEM TO RUN.

RECRUITING WOMEN, ASKING THEM TO RUN.

THAT IS THE THING THAT -- RUN.

THAT IS THE THING THAT -- >> COULD I SAY ABOUT PETRIFIED THAT IS THE THING THAT -- >> COULD I SAY ABOUT PETRIFIED TO YOUR QUESTION.

>> COULD I SAY ABOUT PETRIFIED TO YOUR QUESTION.

THE REPUBLICANS LEARN, THEY HAVE TO YOUR QUESTION.

THE REPUBLICANS LEARN, THEY HAVE SAID IT, THAT IF YOU GET OUT THE REPUBLICANS LEARN, THEY HAVE SAID IT, THAT IF YOU GET OUT EARLY IF YOU WANT TO GET IN SAID IT, THAT IF YOU GET OUT EARLY IF YOU WANT TO GET IN FRONT EVER THESE POPULAR EARLY IF YOU WANT TO GET IN FRONT EVER THESE POPULAR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AND HE DID FRONT EVER THESE POPULAR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AND HE DID THIS WAS -- JUST GET IT OUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AND HE DID THIS WAS -- JUST GET IT OUT THERE, IT DOESN'T MATTER, KNEW THIS WAS -- JUST GET IT OUT THERE, IT DOESN'T MATTER, KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING.

THERE, IT DOESN'T MATTER, KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING.

I THINK HE IS GOING TO GET BACK WHAT HE WAS DOING.

I THINK HE IS GOING TO GET BACK IN THE FACE AND WISH THAT HE I THINK HE IS GOING TO GET BACK IN THE FACE AND WISH THAT HE HADN'T DONE IT.

IN THE FACE AND WISH THAT HE HADN'T DONE IT.

>> WE NEED TO MOVE ON.

HADN'T DONE IT.

>> WE NEED TO MOVE ON.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: >> WE NEED TO MOVE ON.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: A NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY BEHIND THE HEADLINES: A NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM.

A NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM.

IT'S THE SENATE'S TURN TO WEIGH MUSEUM.

IT'S THE SENATE'S TURN TO WEIGH IN ON A WHETHER TO FINALLY STAR IT'S THE SENATE'S TURN TO WEIGH IN ON A WHETHER TO FINALLY STAR WORK ON ONE.

IN ON A WHETHER TO FINALLY STAR WORK ON ONE.

LAST WEEK THE HOUSE ONCE AGAIN WORK ON ONE.

LAST WEEK THE HOUSE ONCE AGAIN APPROVED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION LAST WEEK THE HOUSE ONCE AGAIN APPROVED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO SET UP A COMMISSION TO MOVE APPROVED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO SET UP A COMMISSION TO MOVE THE PROJECT AHEAD.

TO SET UP A COMMISSION TO MOVE THE PROJECT AHEAD.

SIMILAR BILL HAS FAILED MULTIPLE THE PROJECT AHEAD.

SIMILAR BILL HAS FAILED MULTIPLE TIMES DURING THE LAST DECADE.

SIMILAR BILL HAS FAILED MULTIPLE TIMES DURING THE LAST DECADE.

THAT'S DESPITE EFFORTS AND LARGE TIMES DURING THE LAST DECADE.

THAT'S DESPITE EFFORTS AND LARGE CONTRIBUTIONS BY HIGH PROFILE THAT'S DESPITE EFFORTS AND LARGE CONTRIBUTIONS BY HIGH PROFILE SUPPORTERS SUCH AS MUSEUM CONTRIBUTIONS BY HIGH PROFILE SUPPORTERS SUCH AS MUSEUM SPOKESPERSON, ACADEMY AWARD SUPPORTERS SUCH AS MUSEUM SPOKESPERSON, ACADEMY AWARD WINNING ACTRESS, MERYL STREEP.

SPOKESPERSON, ACADEMY AWARD WINNING ACTRESS, MERYL STREEP.

BUT THIS YEAR COULD BE WINNING ACTRESS, MERYL STREEP.

BUT THIS YEAR COULD BE DIFFERENT.

BUT THIS YEAR COULD BE DIFFERENT.

THAT IS WHAT REPRESENTATIVES DIFFERENT.

THAT IS WHAT REPRESENTATIVES CAROLYN MALONEY ON THE LEFT AND THAT IS WHAT REPRESENTATIVES CAROLYN MALONEY ON THE LEFT AND MARSHA BLACKBURN ON THE RIGHT CAROLYN MALONEY ON THE LEFT AND MARSHA BLACKBURN ON THE RIGHT TOLD ME.

MARSHA BLACKBURN ON THE RIGHT TOLD ME.

THE TWO WOMEN HAVE COME TOGETHER TOLD ME.

THE TWO WOMEN HAVE COME TOGETHER TO MAKE THE MUSEUM A REALITY.

THE TWO WOMEN HAVE COME TOGETHER TO MAKE THE MUSEUM A REALITY.

>> THERE HAVE BEEN EFFORTS SINCE TO MAKE THE MUSEUM A REALITY.

>> THERE HAVE BEEN EFFORTS SINCE THE LATE 90'S TO HAVE A WOMEN'S >> THERE HAVE BEEN EFFORTS SINCE THE LATE 90'S TO HAVE A WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM PREFERABLY ON THE THE LATE 90'S TO HAVE A WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM PREFERABLY ON THE MALL CERTAINLY IN WASHINGTON, HISTORY MUSEUM PREFERABLY ON THE MALL CERTAINLY IN WASHINGTON, WHY IS IT TAKING SO LONG?

MALL CERTAINLY IN WASHINGTON, WHY IS IT TAKING SO LONG?

>> I THINK THAT BUILDING WHY IS IT TAKING SO LONG?

>> I THINK THAT BUILDING CONSENSUS TAKES AWHILE AND >> I THINK THAT BUILDING CONSENSUS TAKES AWHILE AND HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSENSUS TAKES AWHILE AND HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO GET TO UNDERSTAND HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO GET TO UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE TO GET TO UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING.

EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING.

>> QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS STUNNED DOING.

>> QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS STUNNED WHEN I COULDN'T FIND A MUSEUM IN >> QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS STUNNED WHEN I COULDN'T FIND A MUSEUM IN THE UNITED STATES, I COULDN'T WHEN I COULDN'T FIND A MUSEUM IN THE UNITED STATES, I COULDN'T FIND ONE INTERNATIONALLY THE UNITED STATES, I COULDN'T FIND ONE INTERNATIONALLY DEDICATED IN A PROFESSIONAL WAY FIND ONE INTERNATIONALLY DEDICATED IN A PROFESSIONAL WAY TO THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND DEDICATED IN A PROFESSIONAL WAY TO THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF WOMEN.

TO THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF WOMEN.

WOMEN WERE A BIG PART OF MOVING CONTRIBUTIONS OF WOMEN.

WOMEN WERE A BIG PART OF MOVING THIS COUNTRY FORWARD IN SO MANY WOMEN WERE A BIG PART OF MOVING THIS COUNTRY FORWARD IN SO MANY WAYS FROM ABIGAIL ADAMS, AND HER THIS COUNTRY FORWARD IN SO MANY WAYS FROM ABIGAIL ADAMS, AND HER STORY WAS NEVER TOLD.

WAYS FROM ABIGAIL ADAMS, AND HER STORY WAS NEVER TOLD.

LET'S TELL THESE STORIES THAT STORY WAS NEVER TOLD.

LET'S TELL THESE STORIES THAT ARE UNFOLDING WITH SALLY RIDE.

LET'S TELL THESE STORIES THAT ARE UNFOLDING WITH SALLY RIDE.

WITH SAUNDRA DAY O'CONNOR FIRST ARE UNFOLDING WITH SALLY RIDE.

WITH SAUNDRA DAY O'CONNOR FIRST WOMAN ON THE SUPREME COURT.

WITH SAUNDRA DAY O'CONNOR FIRST WOMAN ON THE SUPREME COURT.

THESE MASSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS OF WOMAN ON THE SUPREME COURT.

THESE MASSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS OF WOMEN AND THEIR STORIES ARE AN THESE MASSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS OF WOMEN AND THEIR STORIES ARE AN IMPORTANT PART OF OUR HISTORY IT WOMEN AND THEIR STORIES ARE AN IMPORTANT PART OF OUR HISTORY IT SHOULD BE TOLD.

IMPORTANT PART OF OUR HISTORY IT SHOULD BE TOLD.

>> THIS BILL PASSED OR SIMILAR SHOULD BE TOLD.

>> THIS BILL PASSED OR SIMILAR BILL PASSED THE HOUSE SEVERAL >> THIS BILL PASSED OR SIMILAR BILL PASSED THE HOUSE SEVERAL YEARS AGO IS WAS STOPPED IN THE BILL PASSED THE HOUSE SEVERAL YEARS AGO IS WAS STOPPED IN THE SENATE.

YEARS AGO IS WAS STOPPED IN THE SENATE.

WHY IS IT GOING TO GO THROUGH SENATE.

WHY IS IT GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS TIME?

WHY IS IT GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS TIME?

>> STRUCTURE NOW WITH NOT FOR THIS TIME?

>> STRUCTURE NOW WITH NOT FOR PROFIT, WITH ALL THE BEING FUNDS >> STRUCTURE NOW WITH NOT FOR PROFIT, WITH ALL THE BEING FUNDS THAT ARE PRIVATELY RAISED THAT PROFIT, WITH ALL THE BEING FUNDS THAT ARE PRIVATELY RAISED THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.

THAT ARE PRIVATELY RAISED THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.

AND SO MANY EVER THE MALE MAKES A DIFFERENCE.

AND SO MANY EVER THE MALE MEMBERS ARE SAYING, MY GOODNESS, AND SO MANY EVER THE MALE MEMBERS ARE SAYING, MY GOODNESS, I DIDN'T REALIZE THERE WAS NOT MEMBERS ARE SAYING, MY GOODNESS, I DIDN'T REALIZE THERE WAS NOT ANY KIND OF MUSEUM THAT DEALS I DIDN'T REALIZE THERE WAS NOT ANY KIND OF MUSEUM THAT DEALS WITH THE WOMEN'S HISTORY.

ANY KIND OF MUSEUM THAT DEALS WITH THE WOMEN'S HISTORY.

OUR GOAL IS TO MOVE FORWARD THAT WITH THE WOMEN'S HISTORY.

OUR GOAL IS TO MOVE FORWARD THAT WILL ALLOW FOR DISCUSSION OF OUR GOAL IS TO MOVE FORWARD THAT WILL ALLOW FOR DISCUSSION OF WHERE THE MUSEUM WOULD BE WILL ALLOW FOR DISCUSSION OF WHERE THE MUSEUM WOULD BE PLACED.

WHERE THE MUSEUM WOULD BE PLACED.

>> WHY DID YOU TWO DECIDE TO PLACED.

>> WHY DID YOU TWO DECIDE TO COME TOGETHER IN A BIPARTISAN >> WHY DID YOU TWO DECIDE TO COME TOGETHER IN A BIPARTISAN WAY?

COME TOGETHER IN A BIPARTISAN WAY?

>> I DO BELIEVE THAT THE BEST WAY?

>> I DO BELIEVE THAT THE BEST LEGISLATION IS ALWAYS >> I DO BELIEVE THAT THE BEST LEGISLATION IS ALWAYS BIPARTISAN.

LEGISLATION IS ALWAYS BIPARTISAN.

MARSHA IS A FRIEND, SHE ALSO IS BIPARTISAN.

MARSHA IS A FRIEND, SHE ALSO IS REPUBLICAN AND A CONSERVATIVE MARSHA IS A FRIEND, SHE ALSO IS REPUBLICAN AND A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN.

REPUBLICAN AND A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN.

SHE'S WORKED INCREDIBLY HARD IN REPUBLICAN.

SHE'S WORKED INCREDIBLY HARD IN LINING UP SUPPORT, ANSWERING SHE'S WORKED INCREDIBLY HARD IN LINING UP SUPPORT, ANSWERING QUESTIONS AND BEING EVERYWHERE LINING UP SUPPORT, ANSWERING QUESTIONS AND BEING EVERYWHERE SHE NEEDS TO BE TO MAKE THIS QUESTIONS AND BEING EVERYWHERE SHE NEEDS TO BE TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.

SHE NEEDS TO BE TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.

>> I'D LIKE TO ASK BOTH OF YOU, HAPPEN.

>> I'D LIKE TO ASK BOTH OF YOU, THERE WAS $250 MILLION OF >> I'D LIKE TO ASK BOTH OF YOU, THERE WAS $250 MILLION OF FEDERAL MONEY THAT WENT IN TO THERE WAS $250 MILLION OF FEDERAL MONEY THAT WENT IN TO THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM, WHY FEDERAL MONEY THAT WENT IN TO THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM, WHY WAS IT SO MUCH EASIER CITY GET THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM, WHY WAS IT SO MUCH EASIER CITY GET THAT APPROVED THAN TO GET IT WAS IT SO MUCH EASIER CITY GET THAT APPROVED THAN TO GET IT APPROVED FOR WOMEN?

THAT APPROVED THAN TO GET IT APPROVED FOR WOMEN?

>> I THINK THAT WHAT YOU'RE APPROVED FOR WOMEN?

>> I THINK THAT WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS, WITH THE BUDGET >> I THINK THAT WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS, WITH THE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS THAT WE HAVE RIGHT SEEING IS, WITH THE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW AND THE FEDERAL DEBT WHICH CONSTRAINTS THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW AND THE FEDERAL DEBT WHICH IS JUST OUT OF CONTROL, WHAT WE NOW AND THE FEDERAL DEBT WHICH IS JUST OUT OF CONTROL, WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS FOCUS ON PENDING IS JUST OUT OF CONTROL, WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS FOCUS ON PENDING NECESSITIES, THE GOVERNMENT AND NEED TO DO IS FOCUS ON PENDING NECESSITIES, THE GOVERNMENT AND IT SERVES US WELL TO SAY, EVERY NECESSITIES, THE GOVERNMENT AND IT SERVES US WELL TO SAY, EVERY PENNY IS GOING TO BE RAISED IT SERVES US WELL TO SAY, EVERY PENNY IS GOING TO BE RAISED PRIVATELY FROM THE BUILDING, THE PENNY IS GOING TO BE RAISED PRIVATELY FROM THE BUILDING, THE STRUCTURE, THE CURATING, THE PRIVATELY FROM THE BUILDING, THE STRUCTURE, THE CURATING, THE EXHIBITS, THE ENDOWMENT, STRUCTURE, THE CURATING, THE EXHIBITS, THE ENDOWMENT, EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE A EXHIBITS, THE ENDOWMENT, EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE A PRIVATE DOLLAR.

EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE A PRIVATE DOLLAR.

>> ALSO TO YOUR QUESTION IT PRIVATE DOLLAR.

>> ALSO TO YOUR QUESTION IT SEEMS ALWAYS THAT THINGS FOR >> ALSO TO YOUR QUESTION IT SEEMS ALWAYS THAT THINGS FOR WOMEN ARE HARDER.

SEEMS ALWAYS THAT THINGS FOR WOMEN ARE HARDER.

SOME ELEMENTS THAT WANT TO KEEP WOMEN ARE HARDER.

SOME ELEMENTS THAT WANT TO KEEP WOMEN DOWN AND BACK AND DON'T SOME ELEMENTS THAT WANT TO KEEP WOMEN DOWN AND BACK AND DON'T SUPPOSE IT.

WOMEN DOWN AND BACK AND DON'T SUPPOSE IT.

OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE ENEMIES TO SUPPOSE IT.

OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE ENEMIES TO THE MUSEUM WOULD HAVE BEEN OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE ENEMIES TO THE MUSEUM WOULD HAVE BEEN CREATED BY NOW.

THE MUSEUM WOULD HAVE BEEN CREATED BY NOW.

AS GINGER ROGERS SAID, I HAD TO CREATED BY NOW.

AS GINGER ROGERS SAID, I HAD TO DO EVERYTHING THAT FRED ASTAIR AS GINGER ROGERS SAID, I HAD TO DO EVERYTHING THAT FRED ASTAIR DID ONLY IN HIGH HEELS DANCING DO EVERYTHING THAT FRED ASTAIR DID ONLY IN HIGH HEELS DANCING BACKWARDS AND BEING PAID HALF AS DID ONLY IN HIGH HEELS DANCING BACKWARDS AND BEING PAID HALF AS MUCH AS HE WAS.

BACKWARDS AND BEING PAID HALF AS MUCH AS HE WAS.

WE KNEW BETTER ARE THAN TO ASK MUCH AS HE WAS.

WE KNEW BETTER ARE THAN TO ASK FOR MONEY FOR THE MUSEUM AND I WE KNEW BETTER ARE THAN TO ASK FOR MONEY FOR THE MUSEUM AND I FIRMLY BELIEVE IF WE APPEAL TO FOR MONEY FOR THE MUSEUM AND I FIRMLY BELIEVE IF WE APPEAL TO EVERY SCHOOL, CHILD, MALE AND FIRMLY BELIEVE IF WE APPEAL TO EVERY SCHOOL, CHILD, MALE AND FEMALE EVERY WOMAN TO CONTRIBUTE EVERY SCHOOL, CHILD, MALE AND FEMALE EVERY WOMAN TO CONTRIBUTE A DOLLAR OR FIVE WE'D RAISE THE FEMALE EVERY WOMAN TO CONTRIBUTE A DOLLAR OR FIVE WE'D RAISE THE MONEY OVERNIGHT.

A DOLLAR OR FIVE WE'D RAISE THE MONEY OVERNIGHT.

>> TELL ME IF YOU DON'T MIND MONEY OVERNIGHT.

>> TELL ME IF YOU DON'T MIND STATISTICS THAT YOU HAD ABOUT >> TELL ME IF YOU DON'T MIND STATISTICS THAT YOU HAD ABOUT THE NUMBER OF WOMEN STATUES AND STATISTICS THAT YOU HAD ABOUT THE NUMBER OF WOMEN STATUES AND THOSE SORT OF THINGS.

THE NUMBER OF WOMEN STATUES AND THOSE SORT OF THINGS.

>> IN THE CAPITAL THERE ARE 215 THOSE SORT OF THINGS.

>> IN THE CAPITAL THERE ARE 215 STATUES, ONLY NINE ARE OPEN OF >> IN THE CAPITAL THERE ARE 215 STATUES, ONLY NINE ARE OPEN OF THE 2,400 HISTORICAL MONUMENTS STATUES, ONLY NINE ARE OPEN OF THE 2,400 HISTORICAL MONUMENTS ACROSS THIS COUNTRY ONLY 5% OF THE 2,400 HISTORICAL MONUMENTS ACROSS THIS COUNTRY ONLY 5% OF WOMEN.

ACROSS THIS COUNTRY ONLY 5% OF WOMEN.

WE NEED MUSEUM TO INSPIRE THE WOMEN.

WE NEED MUSEUM TO INSPIRE THE NEXT GENERATION OF MALE AND WE NEED MUSEUM TO INSPIRE THE NEXT GENERATION OF MALE AND DEMAIL LEADERS.

NEXT GENERATION OF MALE AND DEMAIL LEADERS.

WE HAVE MANY MUSEUMS FOREPLAN DEMAIL LEADERS.

WE HAVE MANY MUSEUMS FOREPLAN AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

WE HAVE MANY MUSEUMS FOREPLAN AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

THEY MADE HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS TO AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

THEY MADE HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THIS COUNTRY.

THEY MADE HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THIS COUNTRY.

BUT LET'S TELL THE FULL STORY.

THIS COUNTRY.

BUT LET'S TELL THE FULL STORY.

>> SO, I HAVE TO SAY, I'M BUT LET'S TELL THE FULL STORY.

>> SO, I HAVE TO SAY, I'M THRILLED THAT CONGRESS >> SO, I HAVE TO SAY, I'M THRILLED THAT CONGRESS APPROPRIATED THE MONEY FOR THRILLED THAT CONGRESS APPROPRIATED THE MONEY FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ON THE APPROPRIATED THE MONEY FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ON THE MALL.

AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ON THE MALL.

GOING TO BE A FABULOUS MUSEUM.

MALL.

GOING TO BE A FABULOUS MUSEUM.

IT FULLY DESERVES TO BE THERE.

GOING TO BE A FABULOUS MUSEUM.

IT FULLY DESERVES TO BE THERE.

WHY CAN THEY NOT EVEN GET A BILL IT FULLY DESERVES TO BE THERE.

WHY CAN THEY NOT EVEN GET A BILL PASSED NOT FOR ANY MONEY FROM WHY CAN THEY NOT EVEN GET A BILL PASSED NOT FOR ANY MONEY FROM CONGRESS AT ALL.

PASSED NOT FOR ANY MONEY FROM CONGRESS AT ALL.

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

CONGRESS AT ALL.

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SENATE?

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SENATE?

>> BONNIE, I'M ORIGINAL SENATE?

>> BONNIE, I'M ORIGINAL COSPONSOR AND CAROLYN AND I NOT >> BONNIE, I'M ORIGINAL COSPONSOR AND CAROLYN AND I NOT HAD PROBLEMS WITH REPUBLICAN COSPONSOR AND CAROLYN AND I NOT HAD PROBLEMS WITH REPUBLICAN WOMEN.

HAD PROBLEMS WITH REPUBLICAN WOMEN.

WE HAVE HAD PROBLEMS GETTING THE WOMEN.

WE HAVE HAD PROBLEMS GETTING THE IT THROUGH.

WE HAVE HAD PROBLEMS GETTING THE IT THROUGH.

WE ALSO -- IT THROUGH.

WE ALSO -- >> BECAUSE DIDN'T LIKE THERE WAS WE ALSO -- >> BECAUSE DIDN'T LIKE THERE WAS GOING TO BE AN EXHIBIT ABOUT >> BECAUSE DIDN'T LIKE THERE WAS GOING TO BE AN EXHIBIT ABOUT MARGARET THANGER.

GOING TO BE AN EXHIBIT ABOUT MARGARET THANGER.

>> WE DON'T KNOW YET.

MARGARET THANGER.

>> WE DON'T KNOW YET.

THEY FIGURED THAT SOMETHING >> WE DON'T KNOW YET.

THEY FIGURED THAT SOMETHING MIGHT HAPPEN AND THE MEMBERS ON THEY FIGURED THAT SOMETHING MIGHT HAPPEN AND THE MEMBERS ON THE FLOOR WHO SPOKE TO THAT MIGHT HAPPEN AND THE MEMBERS ON THE FLOOR WHO SPOKE TO THAT ISSUE.

THE FLOOR WHO SPOKE TO THAT ISSUE.

I THINK WE MADE A MISTAKE.

ISSUE.

I THINK WE MADE A MISTAKE.

THE WAY WE GOT THE AFRICAN I THINK WE MADE A MISTAKE.

THE WAY WE GOT THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS NOT THE WAY THE WAY WE GOT THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS NOT THE WAY WE TRIED TO GET THE WOMEN'S AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS NOT THE WAY WE TRIED TO GET THE WOMEN'S MUSEUM THROUGH.

WE TRIED TO GET THE WOMEN'S MUSEUM THROUGH.

NOT ONLY TRIED TO GET -- THIS MUSEUM THROUGH.

NOT ONLY TRIED TO GET -- THIS WAS NOT REFERENCE.

NOT ONLY TRIED TO GET -- THIS WAS NOT REFERENCE.

NOT ONLY MUSEUM BUT A PLACE AND WAS NOT REFERENCE.

NOT ONLY MUSEUM BUT A PLACE AND A PARTICULAR PLACE.

NOT ONLY MUSEUM BUT A PLACE AND A PARTICULAR PLACE.

NOBODY CAN DO THAT.

A PARTICULAR PLACE.

NOBODY CAN DO THAT.

YOU HAVE TO COMPETE FOR THE NOBODY CAN DO THAT.

YOU HAVE TO COMPETE FOR THE PLAYS, THE WAY WE GOT TO AFRICAN YOU HAVE TO COMPETE FOR THE PLAYS, THE WAY WE GOT TO AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS SET UP A PLAYS, THE WAY WE GOT TO AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS SET UP A COMMISSION IT TOOK US TEN YEARS AMERICAN MUSEUM WAS SET UP A COMMISSION IT TOOK US TEN YEARS TO GET CONGRESS TO DO THAT.

COMMISSION IT TOOK US TEN YEARS TO GET CONGRESS TO DO THAT.

THIS TIME WE ARE SETTING UP A TO GET CONGRESS TO DO THAT.

THIS TIME WE ARE SETTING UP A COMMISSION.

THIS TIME WE ARE SETTING UP A COMMISSION.

THAT COMMISSION IS GOING TO HAVE COMMISSION.

THAT COMMISSION IS GOING TO HAVE APPOINTEES FROM THE MAJORITY AND THAT COMMISSION IS GOING TO HAVE APPOINTEES FROM THE MAJORITY AND MINORITY SO THERE'S NO WAY IN APPOINTEES FROM THE MAJORITY AND MINORITY SO THERE'S NO WAY IN WHICH IT CAN BE CONTROVERSIAL.

MINORITY SO THERE'S NO WAY IN WHICH IT CAN BE CONTROVERSIAL.

SO, THIS BILL WAS NOT EVEN ABOUT WHICH IT CAN BE CONTROVERSIAL.

SO, THIS BILL WAS NOT EVEN ABOUT A MUSEUM.

SO, THIS BILL WAS NOT EVEN ABOUT A MUSEUM.

IT WAS ABOUT WHETHER THERE A MUSEUM.

IT WAS ABOUT WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE AMY SHE'LL WITH A IT WAS ABOUT WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE AMY SHE'LL WITH A COMMISSION TO MAKE THAT SHOULD BE AMY SHE'LL WITH A COMMISSION TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION AND OF COURSE WE COMMISSION TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION AND OF COURSE WE THINK THEY WILL.

DETERMINATION AND OF COURSE WE THINK THEY WILL.

BUT THIS WAS THE WAY TO GO ABOUT THINK THEY WILL.

BUT THIS WAS THE WAY TO GO ABOUT IT.

BUT THIS WAS THE WAY TO GO ABOUT IT.

>> I THINK THAT I'M GLAD THERE'S IT.

>> I THINK THAT I'M GLAD THERE'S BIPARTISAN COMMISSION IN PLACE.

>> I THINK THAT I'M GLAD THERE'S BIPARTISAN COMMISSION IN PLACE.

BEING ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD ON BIPARTISAN COMMISSION IN PLACE.

BEING ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS MUSEUM IS GOING TO BE BEING ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS MUSEUM IS GOING TO BE HELPFUL.

THIS MUSEUM IS GOING TO BE HELPFUL.

AT THE END ITS PRIVATE DOLLARS HELPFUL.

AT THE END ITS PRIVATE DOLLARS BEING RAISED THEY CAN DECIDE AT THE END ITS PRIVATE DOLLARS BEING RAISED THEY CAN DECIDE WHAT EXHIBITS ARE PUTTING IN.

BEING RAISED THEY CAN DECIDE WHAT EXHIBITS ARE PUTTING IN.

OBVIOUSLY FOR SOCIAL WHAT EXHIBITS ARE PUTTING IN.

OBVIOUSLY FOR SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE IF THERE IS A OBVIOUSLY FOR SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE IF THERE IS A BALANCED APPROACH 'BOW TALKING CONSERVATIVE IF THERE IS A BALANCED APPROACH 'BOW TALKING ABOUT, GOING TO BRING IN PRO BALANCED APPROACH 'BOW TALKING ABOUT, GOING TO BRING IN PRO LIFE, EXHIBIT ON PRO CHOICE ABOUT, GOING TO BRING IN PRO LIFE, EXHIBIT ON PRO CHOICE LEADERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, LIFE, EXHIBIT ON PRO CHOICE LEADERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, YOU DO SOMETHING ON PRO LIFE LEADERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, YOU DO SOMETHING ON PRO LIFE LEADERS.

YOU DO SOMETHING ON PRO LIFE LEADERS.

TRY TO BALANCE IT OUT.

LEADERS.

TRY TO BALANCE IT OUT.

AGAIN THERE'S A PLACE -- TRY TO BALANCE IT OUT.

AGAIN THERE'S A PLACE -- >> THAT'S NOT THE ARGUMENT.

AGAIN THERE'S A PLACE -- >> THAT'S NOT THE ARGUMENT.

THERE IS ALWAYS PLANS TO BALANCE >> THAT'S NOT THE ARGUMENT.

THERE IS ALWAYS PLANS TO BALANCE IT OUT.

THERE IS ALWAYS PLANS TO BALANCE IT OUT.

IT WAS SENATOR TOM COBURN FROM IT OUT.

IT WAS SENATOR TOM COBURN FROM OKLAHOMA PUT A PRIVATE HOLD, HE IT WAS SENATOR TOM COBURN FROM OKLAHOMA PUT A PRIVATE HOLD, HE WAS OUTED, BUT PUT A PRIVATE OKLAHOMA PUT A PRIVATE HOLD, HE WAS OUTED, BUT PUT A PRIVATE HOLD ON IT BECAUSE THERE WAS AN WAS OUTED, BUT PUT A PRIVATE HOLD ON IT BECAUSE THERE WAS AN ONLINE EXHIBIT ON MARGARET -- HOLD ON IT BECAUSE THERE WAS AN ONLINE EXHIBIT ON MARGARET -- >> EXACTLY.

ONLINE EXHIBIT ON MARGARET -- >> EXACTLY.

>> BASICALLY SAID THAT BIRTH >> EXACTLY.

>> BASICALLY SAID THAT BIRTH CONTROL -- >> BASICALLY SAID THAT BIRTH CONTROL -- >> BUT THAT'S NOTE -- CONTROL -- >> BUT THAT'S NOTE -- >> THAT'S NOT WHAT THE PROBLEM >> BUT THAT'S NOTE -- >> THAT'S NOT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS ABOUT AND WE'RE OUT OF TIME.

>> THAT'S NOT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS ABOUT AND WE'RE OUT OF TIME.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

WAS ABOUT AND WE'RE OUT OF TIME.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO THE CONTRARY, SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.

FRUEAUFF FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN FOUNDATION.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT WWW.PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.