03/21/2014 | 25m 47s | Video has closed captioning.
Contraception Cases: Do for-profit corporations have religious rights? Ban Bossy: Sheryl Sandberg says everyone should stop calling young girls "bossy." Behind the Headlines: Congresswomen talk about the past and future of women in leadership. PANEL: Amy Siskind, Kay Coles James, Avis Jones DeWeever, Rina Shah
Aired: 03/21/14
>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY"... >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY"... >> FIRST, THE CONTRACEPTION CONTRARY"... >> FIRST, THE CONTRACEPTION MANDATE HEADS TO THE SUPREME >> FIRST, THE CONTRACEPTION MANDATE HEADS TO THE SUPREME COURT.
MANDATE HEADS TO THE SUPREME COURT.
THEN IS SHERYL SANDBERG'S COURT.
THEN IS SHERYL SANDBERG'S ANTI-BOSSY CAMPAIGN TOO BOSSY?
THEN IS SHERYL SANDBERG'S ANTI-BOSSY CAMPAIGN TOO BOSSY?
BEHIND THE HEADLINES FIVE ANTI-BOSSY CAMPAIGN TOO BOSSY?
BEHIND THE HEADLINES FIVE ESTEEMED FORMER MEMBERS OF BEHIND THE HEADLINES FIVE ESTEEMED FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON THE PAST AND FUTURE ESTEEMED FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON THE PAST AND FUTURE OF WOMEN IN CONGRESS.
CONGRESS ON THE PAST AND FUTURE OF WOMEN IN CONGRESS.
♪] OF WOMEN IN CONGRESS.
♪] >> I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO ♪] >> I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY" A DISCUSSION >> I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY" A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM "TO THE CONTRARY" A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
FIRST, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.
FIRST, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VERSUS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
FIRST, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VERSUS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE AND VERSUS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE AND OBAMACARE AND RELIGION.
BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE AND OBAMACARE AND RELIGION.
THE SUPREME COURT HEARS THE CASE OBAMACARE AND RELIGION.
THE SUPREME COURT HEARS THE CASE CHALLENGING THE AFFORDABLE CARE THE SUPREME COURT HEARS THE CASE CHALLENGING THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE.
CHALLENGING THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE.
LAWYERS FOR FOR-PROFIT ACT CONTRACEPTIVE MANDATE.
LAWYERS FOR FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS, HOBBY BOBBY AND LAWYERS FOR FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS, HOBBY BOBBY AND CONESTOGA WOOD CLAIM THEY SHOULD CORPORATIONS, HOBBY BOBBY AND CONESTOGA WOOD CLAIM THEY SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BIRTH CONESTOGA WOOD CLAIM THEY SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE TO FEMALE NOT BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE TO FEMALE EMPLOYEES.
CONTROL COVERAGE TO FEMALE EMPLOYEES.
THE QUESTION AT THE HEART OF EMPLOYEES.
THE QUESTION AT THE HEART OF SEBELIUS V. HOBBY LOBBY IS THE QUESTION AT THE HEART OF SEBELIUS V. HOBBY LOBBY IS WHETHER A CORPORATION HAS SEBELIUS V. HOBBY LOBBY IS WHETHER A CORPORATION HAS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
WHETHER A CORPORATION HAS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
WHAT IS AT STAKE REALLY IS A RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
WHAT IS AT STAKE REALLY IS A MAJOR QUESTION IN THIS COUNTRY WHAT IS AT STAKE REALLY IS A MAJOR QUESTION IN THIS COUNTRY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT MAJOR QUESTION IN THIS COUNTRY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT CORPORATIONS HAVE HAVE A AS TO WHETHER OR NOT CORPORATIONS HAVE HAVE A RELIGIOUS BELIEF.
CORPORATIONS HAVE HAVE A RELIGIOUS BELIEF.
IN FACT WHAT IS HAPPENING IS RELIGIOUS BELIEF.
IN FACT WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THAT THE OWNER OF THE IN FACT WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THAT THE OWNER OF THE CORPORATION IS TRYING TO IMPOSE THAT THE OWNER OF THE CORPORATION IS TRYING TO IMPOSE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HIS CORPORATION IS TRYING TO IMPOSE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HIS EMPLOYEES THERE BY DENYING WOMEN HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HIS EMPLOYEES THERE BY DENYING WOMEN INDEPENDENCE IN THEIR HEALTH EMPLOYEES THERE BY DENYING WOMEN INDEPENDENCE IN THEIR HEALTH PLAN OF CONTRACEPTIVE COVERAGE INDEPENDENCE IN THEIR HEALTH PLAN OF CONTRACEPTIVE COVERAGE IN A WAY THAT EVERYBODY ELSE IN PLAN OF CONTRACEPTIVE COVERAGE IN A WAY THAT EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE COUNTRY CAN HAVE.
IN A WAY THAT EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE COUNTRY CAN HAVE.
>> GROUPS ARE LINING UP ON BOTH THE COUNTRY CAN HAVE.
>> GROUPS ARE LINING UP ON BOTH SIDES.
>> GROUPS ARE LINING UP ON BOTH SIDES.
RELIGIOUS CONSERVATIVES WHO SIDES.
RELIGIOUS CONSERVATIVES WHO FILED MOST OF THE BRIEFS, FEAR RELIGIOUS CONSERVATIVES WHO FILED MOST OF THE BRIEFS, FEAR THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS FILED MOST OF THE BRIEFS, FEAR THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK.
THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK.
WOMEN'S HEALTH AND RIGHTS FREEDOM RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK.
WOMEN'S HEALTH AND RIGHTS GROUPS, FEAR A RULING IN FAVOR WOMEN'S HEALTH AND RIGHTS GROUPS, FEAR A RULING IN FAVOR OF HOBBY LOBBY VIOLATES THE GROUPS, FEAR A RULING IN FAVOR OF HOBBY LOBBY VIOLATES THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES OF HOBBY LOBBY VIOLATES THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES AND COULD PAVE THE WAY FOR OTHER RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES AND COULD PAVE THE WAY FOR OTHER DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES.
AND COULD PAVE THE WAY FOR OTHER DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES.
KAY COLES JAMES DO YOU THINK DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES.
KAY COLES JAMES DO YOU THINK WHEN THE FRAMERS WERE SITTING KAY COLES JAMES DO YOU THINK WHEN THE FRAMERS WERE SITTING AROUND PUTTING TOGETHER THE WHEN THE FRAMERS WERE SITTING AROUND PUTTING TOGETHER THE CONSTITUTION AND INSERTED THE AROUND PUTTING TOGETHER THE CONSTITUTION AND INSERTED THE FREE EXPRESSION CLAUSE DO YOU CONSTITUTION AND INSERTED THE FREE EXPRESSION CLAUSE DO YOU THINK THEY WERE THINK BEING FREE EXPRESSION CLAUSE DO YOU THINK THEY WERE THINK BEING HAVING IT PERTAIN TO THINK THEY WERE THINK BEING HAVING IT PERTAIN TO CORPORATIONS?
HAVING IT PERTAIN TO CORPORATIONS?
>> THEY PROBABLY COULD NOT HAVE CORPORATIONS?
>> THEY PROBABLY COULD NOT HAVE IMAGINED THE CORPORATIONS WE >> THEY PROBABLY COULD NOT HAVE IMAGINED THE CORPORATIONS WE HAVE TODAY IN TERMS OF SIZE AND IMAGINED THE CORPORATIONS WE HAVE TODAY IN TERMS OF SIZE AND SCOPE BUT WE KNOW THIS, THAT IN HAVE TODAY IN TERMS OF SIZE AND SCOPE BUT WE KNOW THIS, THAT IN SUBSEQUENT COURT CASES AND SCOPE BUT WE KNOW THIS, THAT IN SUBSEQUENT COURT CASES AND STATUTORILY, THE PRECEDENT HAS SUBSEQUENT COURT CASES AND STATUTORILY, THE PRECEDENT HAS BEEN SET AND CORPORATIONS ARE STATUTORILY, THE PRECEDENT HAS BEEN SET AND CORPORATIONS ARE PROTECTED.
BEEN SET AND CORPORATIONS ARE PROTECTED.
>> I DO NOT THINK SO INSPITE OF PROTECTED.
>> I DO NOT THINK SO INSPITE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S WRONG HEADED >> I DO NOT THINK SO INSPITE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S WRONG HEADED DECISION AND MITT ROMNEY'S THE SUPREME COURT'S WRONG HEADED DECISION AND MITT ROMNEY'S LOGIC, CORPORATIONS ARE NOT DECISION AND MITT ROMNEY'S LOGIC, CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.
LOGIC, CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.
>> I AGREE.
PEOPLE.
>> I AGREE.
THE NO, I DO NOT THINK OUR >> I AGREE.
THE NO, I DO NOT THINK OUR FOUNDERS THOUGHT THAT THE NO, I DO NOT THINK OUR FOUNDERS THOUGHT THAT CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE.
FOUNDERS THOUGHT THAT CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE.
IN 1878 WHEN THE SUPREME COURT CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE.
IN 1878 WHEN THE SUPREME COURT RULED ON THE LIMITS OF RELIGIOUS IN 1878 WHEN THE SUPREME COURT RULED ON THE LIMITS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM THEY SAID CORPORATIONS RULED ON THE LIMITS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM THEY SAID CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.
FREEDOM THEY SAID CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.
WE ARE HERE AT PRESENT DAY AND ARE NOT PEOPLE.
WE ARE HERE AT PRESENT DAY AND THE ANSWER IS STILL NO.
WE ARE HERE AT PRESENT DAY AND THE ANSWER IS STILL NO.
>> I THINK HOBBY LOBBY'S THE ANSWER IS STILL NO.
>> I THINK HOBBY LOBBY'S RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS A EUPHENISM >> I THINK HOBBY LOBBY'S RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS A EUPHENISM FOR THEIR IMPOSES THEIR RELIGION RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS A EUPHENISM FOR THEIR IMPOSES THEIR RELIGION ON THE REST OF US.
FOR THEIR IMPOSES THEIR RELIGION ON THE REST OF US.
>> AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT.
ON THE REST OF US.
>> AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT.
I ALWAYS LOOK AT THE CASES AND I >> AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT.
I ALWAYS LOOK AT THE CASES AND I THINK YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BE A I ALWAYS LOOK AT THE CASES AND I THINK YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BE A CHRISTIAN, A MUSLIM, A WICCAN.
THINK YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BE A CHRISTIAN, A MUSLIM, A WICCAN.
AND WHEN THE FRAMERS THE PEOPLE CHRISTIAN, A MUSLIM, A WICCAN.
AND WHEN THE FRAMERS THE PEOPLE WHO LEFT ENGLAND WERE BEING AND WHEN THE FRAMERS THE PEOPLE WHO LEFT ENGLAND WERE BEING CONVERTED AND THAT IS WHY THEY WHO LEFT ENGLAND WERE BEING CONVERTED AND THAT IS WHY THEY LEFT.
CONVERTED AND THAT IS WHY THEY LEFT.
THEY DID NOT WANT THAT.
LEFT.
THEY DID NOT WANT THAT.
THEY CAME HERE SO THEY COULD BE THEY DID NOT WANT THAT.
THEY CAME HERE SO THEY COULD BE WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO BE.
THEY CAME HERE SO THEY COULD BE WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO BE.
>> REMEMBER, THE SEPARATION OF WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO BE.
>> REMEMBER, THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE WAS TO KEEP THE >> REMEMBER, THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE WAS TO KEEP THE GOVERNMENT FROM IMPOSES ON CHURCH AND STATE WAS TO KEEP THE GOVERNMENT FROM IMPOSES ON CITIZENS ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT FROM IMPOSES ON CITIZENS ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT RELIGION.
CITIZENS ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT RELIGION.
>> BUT WHEN YOU CAN DO JUST RELIGION.
>> BUT WHEN YOU CAN DO JUST ABOUT ANYTHING COMPLETELY >> BUT WHEN YOU CAN DO JUST ABOUT ANYTHING COMPLETELY ANYTHING YOU WANT IN CHURCH ABOUT ANYTHING COMPLETELY ANYTHING YOU WANT IN CHURCH OBSERVE ANY RELIGION YOU WANT, ANYTHING YOU WANT IN CHURCH OBSERVE ANY RELIGION YOU WANT, THIS GETS -- OBSERVE ANY RELIGION YOU WANT, THIS GETS -- THIS IS SUCH A TINY ISSUE IN THIS GETS -- THIS IS SUCH A TINY ISSUE IN TERMS OF YOUR FREEDOM OF THIS IS SUCH A TINY ISSUE IN TERMS OF YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF RELIGION.
TERMS OF YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF RELIGION.
IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.
EXPRESSION OF RELIGION.
IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.
>> IT IS NOT A TINY ISSUE WHEN IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.
>> IT IS NOT A TINY ISSUE WHEN THE ISSUE FOR THE GREEN FAMILY, >> IT IS NOT A TINY ISSUE WHEN THE ISSUE FOR THE GREEN FAMILY, AND I THINK WE HAVE TO BE HONEST THE ISSUE FOR THE GREEN FAMILY, AND I THINK WE HAVE TO BE HONEST IN THIS DEBATE AND DISCUSSION.
AND I THINK WE HAVE TO BE HONEST IN THIS DEBATE AND DISCUSSION.
IT'S NOT ABOUT CONTRACEPTION IT IN THIS DEBATE AND DISCUSSION.
IT'S NOT ABOUT CONTRACEPTION IT IS ABOUT ABORTIONIZATIONS AND IT'S NOT ABOUT CONTRACEPTION IT IS ABOUT ABORTIONIZATIONS AND FOR THEM IT IS THE TAKING OF A IS ABOUT ABORTIONIZATIONS AND FOR THEM IT IS THE TAKING OF A HUMAN LIFE AND WE HAVE TO FOR THEM IT IS THE TAKING OF A HUMAN LIFE AND WE HAVE TO RESPECT THAT.
HUMAN LIFE AND WE HAVE TO RESPECT THAT.
IF SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO RESPECT THAT.
IF SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE MEANS AND THE IF SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE MEANS AND THE MECHANISM TO TAKE ANOTHER HUMAN PROVIDE THE MEANS AND THE MECHANISM TO TAKE ANOTHER HUMAN LIFE THAT IS BIG STUFF.
MECHANISM TO TAKE ANOTHER HUMAN LIFE THAT IS BIG STUFF.
AND WE OUGHT TO RESPECT THAT.
LIFE THAT IS BIG STUFF.
AND WE OUGHT TO RESPECT THAT.
>> I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING AND WE OUGHT TO RESPECT THAT.
>> I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING BROADER THAT IS GOING ON WITH >> I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING BROADER THAT IS GOING ON WITH THE EXTREMISTS OPPORTUNITY THE BROADER THAT IS GOING ON WITH THE EXTREMISTS OPPORTUNITY THE RIGHT.
THE EXTREMISTS OPPORTUNITY THE RIGHT.
IT'S GOING ON NOT ONLY WITH RIGHT.
IT'S GOING ON NOT ONLY WITH WOMEN'S ISSUES BUT GAY RIGHTS IN IT'S GOING ON NOT ONLY WITH WOMEN'S ISSUES BUT GAY RIGHTS IN ARIZONA.
WOMEN'S ISSUES BUT GAY RIGHTS IN ARIZONA.
WITH MINORITY VOTING RIGHTS IN ARIZONA.
WITH MINORITY VOTING RIGHTS IN KANSAS.
WITH MINORITY VOTING RIGHTS IN KANSAS.
THERE IS A BATTLE UNDERWAY TO KANSAS.
THERE IS A BATTLE UNDERWAY TO KIND OF REDEFINE AND LIMIT THERE IS A BATTLE UNDERWAY TO KIND OF REDEFINE AND LIMIT EVERYBODY WHO IS NOT WHITE, KIND OF REDEFINE AND LIMIT EVERYBODY WHO IS NOT WHITE, STRAIGHT AND MALE.
EVERYBODY WHO IS NOT WHITE, STRAIGHT AND MALE.
>> ARE THEY WINNING?
STRAIGHT AND MALE.
>> ARE THEY WINNING?
I THINK THEY ARE WINNING WITH >> ARE THEY WINNING?
I THINK THEY ARE WINNING WITH THE WHITE STRAIGHT MEN AND THEY I THINK THEY ARE WINNING WITH THE WHITE STRAIGHT MEN AND THEY ARE LOSING TO EVERYBODY ELSE TO THE WHITE STRAIGHT MEN AND THEY ARE LOSING TO EVERYBODY ELSE TO THE OTHER SIDE.
ARE LOSING TO EVERYBODY ELSE TO THE OTHER SIDE.
BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY THE OTHER SIDE.
BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY YOU CANNOT HAVE YOUR CAKE AND BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY YOU CANNOT HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT, TOO.
YOU CANNOT HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT, TOO.
YOU CANNOT SAY YOU ARE FOR LESS EAT IT, TOO.
YOU CANNOT SAY YOU ARE FOR LESS GOVERNMENT AND LESS INVOLVEMENT YOU CANNOT SAY YOU ARE FOR LESS GOVERNMENT AND LESS INVOLVEMENT IN PEOPLE'S LIVES AND GET INTO GOVERNMENT AND LESS INVOLVEMENT IN PEOPLE'S LIVES AND GET INTO MY BEDROOM AND MY LIFE.
IN PEOPLE'S LIVES AND GET INTO MY BEDROOM AND MY LIFE.
>> I HAVE TO DISAGREE.
MY BEDROOM AND MY LIFE.
>> I HAVE TO DISAGREE.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT BEING WHITE, >> I HAVE TO DISAGREE.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT BEING WHITE, STRAIGHT AND MALE ON THIS.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT BEING WHITE, STRAIGHT AND MALE ON THIS.
THIS IS ABOUT WHAT KAY SAID, CAN STRAIGHT AND MALE ON THIS.
THIS IS ABOUT WHAT KAY SAID, CAN YOU NOT COMPEL THE PEOPLE WHO THIS IS ABOUT WHAT KAY SAID, CAN YOU NOT COMPEL THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD NOT YOU NOT COMPEL THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD NOT TAKE ANOTHER LIFE THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THEY SHOULD NOT TAKE ANOTHER LIFE THEY DO NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE MECHANISM TO TAKE ANOTHER LIFE THEY DO NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE MECHANISM TO DO SO.
WANT TO PROVIDE THE MECHANISM TO DO SO.
>> THE WAY THE OBAMA DO SO.
>> THE WAY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SET IT UP, THEY >> THE WAY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SET IT UP, THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING.
ADMINISTRATION SET IT UP, THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING.
THEY ARE NOT PAYING A PENNY FOR ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING.
THEY ARE NOT PAYING A PENNY FOR THIS.
THEY ARE NOT PAYING A PENNY FOR THIS.
SO IT'S NOT TAKING MONEY FROM THIS.
SO IT'S NOT TAKING MONEY FROM THEM.
SO IT'S NOT TAKING MONEY FROM THEM.
THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO -- THEM.
THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO -- AND OF COURSE THE ARGUMENT THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO -- AND OF COURSE THE ARGUMENT GETTING BACK TO WHAT YOU SAID, AND OF COURSE THE ARGUMENT GETTING BACK TO WHAT YOU SAID, KAY, IS BIRTH CONTROL PILLS?
GETTING BACK TO WHAT YOU SAID, KAY, IS BIRTH CONTROL PILLS?
>> THERE ARE 20 DIFFERENT KAY, IS BIRTH CONTROL PILLS?
>> THERE ARE 20 DIFFERENT CONTRACEPTIONS THAT FDA >> THERE ARE 20 DIFFERENT CONTRACEPTIONS THAT FDA APPROVED.
CONTRACEPTIONS THAT FDA APPROVED.
THE GREEN FAMILY IS PREPARED TO APPROVED.
THE GREEN FAMILY IS PREPARED TO DO 16 OF THEM.
THE GREEN FAMILY IS PREPARED TO DO 16 OF THEM.
THE FOUR THAT THEY ARE NOT THEY DO 16 OF THEM.
THE FOUR THAT THEY ARE NOT THEY FEEL VERY STRONGLY AND THE FOUR THAT THEY ARE NOT THEY FEEL VERY STRONGLY AND PERSONALLY THAT THOSE FOUR FEEL VERY STRONGLY AND PERSONALLY THAT THOSE FOUR ACTUALLY TAKE HUMAN LIFE.
PERSONALLY THAT THOSE FOUR ACTUALLY TAKE HUMAN LIFE.
I THINK WE CAN ACCOMMODATE THAT.
ACTUALLY TAKE HUMAN LIFE.
I THINK WE CAN ACCOMMODATE THAT.
>> SO THEN YOU SAY THESE ARE I THINK WE CAN ACCOMMODATE THAT.
>> SO THEN YOU SAY THESE ARE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BECAUSE >> SO THEN YOU SAY THESE ARE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BECAUSE NOT EVERYBODY SHARES A LOT OF -- THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BECAUSE NOT EVERYBODY SHARES A LOT OF -- PROBABLY IN THIS COUNTRY, MORE NOT EVERYBODY SHARES A LOT OF -- PROBABLY IN THIS COUNTRY, MORE PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE THAT ARE PROBABLY IN THIS COUNTRY, MORE PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE THAT ARE 486 OR THE ABORTIZATIONS CULLLY PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE THAT ARE 486 OR THE ABORTIZATIONS CULLLY ARE TAKING A LIFE.
486 OR THE ABORTIZATIONS CULLLY ARE TAKING A LIFE.
THEN WHY DON'T YOU SEE IT AS ARE TAKING A LIFE.
THEN WHY DON'T YOU SEE IT AS THEM IMPOSES THEIR RELIGIOUS THEN WHY DON'T YOU SEE IT AS THEM IMPOSES THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON THE PEOPLE WHO THEM IMPOSES THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON THE PEOPLE WHO WANT -- BELIEFS ON THE PEOPLE WHO WANT -- >> THEY ARE IMPOSES THEIR WANT -- >> THEY ARE IMPOSES THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS I THINK THEY >> THEY ARE IMPOSES THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS I THINK THEY STARTED THIS COMPANY IN THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS I THINK THEY STARTED THIS COMPANY IN THEIR GARAGE.
STARTED THIS COMPANY IN THEIR GARAGE.
PEOPLE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GARAGE.
PEOPLE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME AND EITHER WORK OR NOT WORK PEOPLE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME AND EITHER WORK OR NOT WORK THERE.
COME AND EITHER WORK OR NOT WORK THERE.
AND IF YOU FIND THIS SO ABHORENT THERE.
AND IF YOU FIND THIS SO ABHORENT THEN THIS IS A COMPANY THAT YOU AND IF YOU FIND THIS SO ABHORENT THEN THIS IS A COMPANY THAT YOU MIGHT CHOOSE NOT TO BUY FROM OR THEN THIS IS A COMPANY THAT YOU MIGHT CHOOSE NOT TO BUY FROM OR WORK FOR.
MIGHT CHOOSE NOT TO BUY FROM OR WORK FOR.
>> THAT IS A VERY SLIPPERY SLOPE WORK FOR.
>> THAT IS A VERY SLIPPERY SLOPE THAT WE ARE GOING DOWN HERE.
>> THAT IS A VERY SLIPPERY SLOPE THAT WE ARE GOING DOWN HERE.
ARE WE THEN PUTTING THE ONUS ON THAT WE ARE GOING DOWN HERE.
ARE WE THEN PUTTING THE ONUS ON JOB HUNTERS TO SAY YOU NEED TO ARE WE THEN PUTTING THE ONUS ON JOB HUNTERS TO SAY YOU NEED TO FIGURE OUT THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS JOB HUNTERS TO SAY YOU NEED TO FIGURE OUT THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY TO FIGURE OUT THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT OF THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT OWNER IS GOING TO PRECLUDE YOU DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT OWNER IS GOING TO PRECLUDE YOU FROM GETTING THE FULL VARIETY OF OWNER IS GOING TO PRECLUDE YOU FROM GETTING THE FULL VARIETY OF HEALTH SERVICES THAT YOU DESERVE FROM GETTING THE FULL VARIETY OF HEALTH SERVICES THAT YOU DESERVE AS A CITIZEN AS A HUMAN BEING IN HEALTH SERVICES THAT YOU DESERVE AS A CITIZEN AS A HUMAN BEING IN TERMS OF YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS TO AS A CITIZEN AS A HUMAN BEING IN TERMS OF YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS TO HAVE ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE?
TERMS OF YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS TO HAVE ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE?
>> I THINK IT'S EASY WHEN YOU'RE HAVE ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE?
>> I THINK IT'S EASY WHEN YOU'RE JOB HUNTING IT'S IN HR.
>> I THINK IT'S EASY WHEN YOU'RE JOB HUNTING IT'S IN HR.
IT IS NOT A BIG DIG TO FIND OUT JOB HUNTING IT'S IN HR.
IT IS NOT A BIG DIG TO FIND OUT THAT CONTRACEPTION WOULD IT IS NOT A BIG DIG TO FIND OUT THAT CONTRACEPTION WOULD THREE-POINT SHOT BE AVAILABLE TO THAT CONTRACEPTION WOULD THREE-POINT SHOT BE AVAILABLE TO YOU AND YOU COULD MOVE ON.
THREE-POINT SHOT BE AVAILABLE TO YOU AND YOU COULD MOVE ON.
>> JOBS ARE PLENTIFUL YOU CAN YOU AND YOU COULD MOVE ON.
>> JOBS ARE PLENTIFUL YOU CAN GET ANOTHER ONE.
>> JOBS ARE PLENTIFUL YOU CAN GET ANOTHER ONE.
>> YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT BUT GET ANOTHER ONE.
>> YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT BUT IT'S NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT THAT >> YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT BUT IT'S NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT THAT AN EMPLOYER IS NOT WILLING TO IT'S NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT THAT AN EMPLOYER IS NOT WILLING TO GIVE YOU SOMETHING AND IF YOU DO AN EMPLOYER IS NOT WILLING TO GIVE YOU SOMETHING AND IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH IT AND I DO NOT GIVE YOU SOMETHING AND IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH IT AND I DO NOT THINK CONTRACEPTION IS A RIGHT.
NOT AGREE WITH IT AND I DO NOT THINK CONTRACEPTION IS A RIGHT.
>> 99% OF WOMEN -- THINK CONTRACEPTION IS A RIGHT.
>> 99% OF WOMEN -- 98% OF CATHOLICS USE >> 99% OF WOMEN -- 98% OF CATHOLICS USE CONTRACEPTION.
98% OF CATHOLICS USE CONTRACEPTION.
>> AND WE -- CONTRACEPTION.
>> AND WE -- [ALL TALKING AT ONCE].
>> AND WE -- [ALL TALKING AT ONCE].
>> MAYBE I AM IN THE 1%.
[ALL TALKING AT ONCE].
>> MAYBE I AM IN THE 1%.
>> PEOPLE THROWN AROUND A LOT >> MAYBE I AM IN THE 1%.
>> PEOPLE THROWN AROUND A LOT THAT 89% OF CATHOLICS USE >> PEOPLE THROWN AROUND A LOT THAT 89% OF CATHOLICS USE CONTRACEPTION.
THAT 89% OF CATHOLICS USE CONTRACEPTION.
>> 98.
CONTRACEPTION.
>> 98.
>> AND DON'T SEE IT AS A MORAL >> 98.
>> AND DON'T SEE IT AS A MORAL ISSUE.
>> AND DON'T SEE IT AS A MORAL ISSUE.
>> USED IT.
ISSUE.
>> USED IT.
OR USE IT.
>> USED IT.
OR USE IT.
BUT I THINK IF YOU ASK THE OR USE IT.
BUT I THINK IF YOU ASK THE QUESTION ABOUT ABORTIZATIONS YOU BUT I THINK IF YOU ASK THE QUESTION ABOUT ABORTIZATIONS YOU WOULD GET A DIFFERENT ANSWER.
QUESTION ABOUT ABORTIZATIONS YOU WOULD GET A DIFFERENT ANSWER.
AND SO THERE IS -- WOULD GET A DIFFERENT ANSWER.
AND SO THERE IS -- >> AND THERE IS A POLL TO COMMIT AND SO THERE IS -- >> AND THERE IS A POLL TO COMMIT TO.
>> AND THERE IS A POLL TO COMMIT TO.
LET'S BEFORE WE LEAVE WHO IS TO.
LET'S BEFORE WE LEAVE WHO IS GOING TO WIN THIS CASE?
LET'S BEFORE WE LEAVE WHO IS GOING TO WIN THIS CASE?
>> I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE GOING TO WIN THIS CASE?
>> I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE LEAVE THE BILL THE LAW INTACT AS >> I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE LEAVE THE BILL THE LAW INTACT AS IT IS.
LEAVE THE BILL THE LAW INTACT AS IT IS.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT YOU IT IS.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT YOU SHOULD NOT NO ONE SHOULD HAVE THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT YOU SHOULD NOT NO ONE SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE THEIR SHOULD NOT NO ONE SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON ME.
THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON ME.
>> AND I DON'T THINK THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON ME.
>> AND I DON'T THINK THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPOSE ITS >> AND I DON'T THINK THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPOSE ITS RELIGIOUS STANDARDS ON ME AND IF GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPOSE ITS RELIGIOUS STANDARDS ON ME AND IF I FIND ABORTION ABHORENT AND I'M RELIGIOUS STANDARDS ON ME AND IF I FIND ABORTION ABHORENT AND I'M RUNNING A BUSINESS I'M NOT I FIND ABORTION ABHORENT AND I'M RUNNING A BUSINESS I'M NOT PAYING FOR ONE.
RUNNING A BUSINESS I'M NOT PAYING FOR ONE.
BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT IS GOING TO PAYING FOR ONE.
BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE CASE ANYBODY'S BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE CASE ANYBODY'S GUESS.
HAPPEN WITH THE CASE ANYBODY'S GUESS.
>> I DON'T THINK IT'S ANYBODY'S GUESS.
>> I DON'T THINK IT'S ANYBODY'S GUESS.
>> I DON'T THINK IT'S ANYBODY'S GUESS.
FOR THE CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY IS GUESS.
FOR THE CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY IS GOING TO RULE LIKE THEY DID WITH FOR THE CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY IS GOING TO RULE LIKE THEY DID WITH THE -- GOING TO RULE LIKE THEY DID WITH THE -- >> THEY MIGHT SPLIT IT BETWEEN THE -- >> THEY MIGHT SPLIT IT BETWEEN PERSONAL AND CORPORATE.
>> THEY MIGHT SPLIT IT BETWEEN PERSONAL AND CORPORATE.
>> 4-AND-A-HALF AND PERSONAL AND CORPORATE.
>> 4-AND-A-HALF AND 4-AND-A-HALF.
>> 4-AND-A-HALF AND 4-AND-A-HALF.
LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
4-AND-A-HALF.
LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE ERBE LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE ERBE FROM BANNING BIRTH CONTROL TO FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE ERBE FROM BANNING BIRTH CONTROL TO BANNING BOSSY.
FROM BANNING BIRTH CONTROL TO BANNING BOSSY.
>> BAN BOSSY IS Facebook COO BANNING BOSSY.
>> BAN BOSSY IS Facebook COO SHERYL SANDBERG'S NEW CAMPAIGN >> BAN BOSSY IS Facebook COO SHERYL SANDBERG'S NEW CAMPAIGN TO EMPOWER YOUNG GIRLS.
SHERYL SANDBERG'S NEW CAMPAIGN TO EMPOWER YOUNG GIRLS.
IT IS COMING UNDER INTENSE TO EMPOWER YOUNG GIRLS.
IT IS COMING UNDER INTENSE SCRUTINY.
IT IS COMING UNDER INTENSE SCRUTINY.
SHERYL SANDBERG CLAIMS YOUNG SCRUTINY.
SHERYL SANDBERG CLAIMS YOUNG BOYS GET PRAISE FOR BEING SHERYL SANDBERG CLAIMS YOUNG BOYS GET PRAISE FOR BEING ASSERTIVE AND YOUNG GIRLS ARE BOYS GET PRAISE FOR BEING ASSERTIVE AND YOUNG GIRLS ARE CRITICIZED.
ASSERTIVE AND YOUNG GIRLS ARE CRITICIZED.
SANDBERG IS TEAMING UP WITH THE CRITICIZED.
SANDBERG IS TEAMING UP WITH THE GIRL SCOUTS TO STOP USING THE SANDBERG IS TEAMING UP WITH THE GIRL SCOUTS TO STOP USING THE TERM BOSSY TO DESCRIBE YOUNG GIRL SCOUTS TO STOP USING THE TERM BOSSY TO DESCRIBE YOUNG GIRLS.
TERM BOSSY TO DESCRIBE YOUNG GIRLS.
A NUMBER OF HIGH PROFILE WOMEN GIRLS.
A NUMBER OF HIGH PROFILE WOMEN ARE BACKING THE CAMPAIGN.
A NUMBER OF HIGH PROFILE WOMEN ARE BACKING THE CAMPAIGN.
SOME CRITICS CALL IT SIMPLISTIC.
ARE BACKING THE CAMPAIGN.
SOME CRITICS CALL IT SIMPLISTIC.
ONE SAYS IT LEANS TOO FAR.
SOME CRITICS CALL IT SIMPLISTIC.
ONE SAYS IT LEANS TOO FAR.
AANYTHING TA HARRIS WHO WRITES ONE SAYS IT LEANS TOO FAR.
AANYTHING TA HARRIS WHO WRITES BOOKS ARGUES BANNING BOSSY MAY AANYTHING TA HARRIS WHO WRITES BOOKS ARGUES BANNING BOSSY MAY LEAD TO BULLYING.
BOOKS ARGUES BANNING BOSSY MAY LEAD TO BULLYING.
>> MY CONCERN IS THAT IF THE LEAD TO BULLYING.
>> MY CONCERN IS THAT IF THE GIRLS WHO ARE MORE FORCEFUL ARE >> MY CONCERN IS THAT IF THE GIRLS WHO ARE MORE FORCEFUL ARE THE ONES CONSIDERED LEADERS THAT GIRLS WHO ARE MORE FORCEFUL ARE THE ONES CONSIDERED LEADERS THAT COULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE THE ONES CONSIDERED LEADERS THAT COULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRENGTH OF COULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRENGTH OF OTHER GIRLS.
DEVELOPMENT AND STRENGTH OF OTHER GIRLS.
I THINK THERE CAN BE A FINE LINE OTHER GIRLS.
I THINK THERE CAN BE A FINE LINE BETWEEN BEING OVERLY BOSSY IN I THINK THERE CAN BE A FINE LINE BETWEEN BEING OVERLY BOSSY IN THE WORST SENSE OF THE WORD BETWEEN BEING OVERLY BOSSY IN THE WORST SENSE OF THE WORD WHICH IS DICTATORIAL OR REALLY THE WORST SENSE OF THE WORD WHICH IS DICTATORIAL OR REALLY TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO DO, AND WHICH IS DICTATORIAL OR REALLY TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO DO, AND THE SHADE OF BECOMING A BULLY TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO DO, AND THE SHADE OF BECOMING A BULLY AND HAVING THAT BECOME THE SHADE OF BECOMING A BULLY AND HAVING THAT BECOME ACCEPTABLE.
AND HAVING THAT BECOME ACCEPTABLE.
>> ALSO THIS WEEK, SANDBERG'S ACCEPTABLE.
>> ALSO THIS WEEK, SANDBERG'S BOOK TOOK A HIT IN THE BLOG >> ALSO THIS WEEK, SANDBERG'S BOOK TOOK A HIT IN THE BLOG SPHERE WHICH WENT WILD OVER ONE BOOK TOOK A HIT IN THE BLOG SPHERE WHICH WENT WILD OVER ONE WOMAN'S EFFORT TO NEGOTIATE A SPHERE WHICH WENT WILD OVER ONE WOMAN'S EFFORT TO NEGOTIATE A HIGHER STARTING SALARY AS WOMAN'S EFFORT TO NEGOTIATE A HIGHER STARTING SALARY AS SANDBERG SUGGESTS.
HIGHER STARTING SALARY AS SANDBERG SUGGESTS.
A WOMAN KNOWN AS W WAS OFFERED A SANDBERG SUGGESTS.
A WOMAN KNOWN AS W WAS OFFERED A PROFESSORSHIP AT NAZARETH A WOMAN KNOWN AS W WAS OFFERED A PROFESSORSHIP AT NAZARETH COLLEGE IN NEW YORK AND TOOK PROFESSORSHIP AT NAZARETH COLLEGE IN NEW YORK AND TOOK SANDBERG'S ADVICE AND ASKED FOR COLLEGE IN NEW YORK AND TOOK SANDBERG'S ADVICE AND ASKED FOR A HIGHER SALARY AND A SHORT LIST SANDBERG'S ADVICE AND ASKED FOR A HIGHER SALARY AND A SHORT LIST OF BENEFITS.
A HIGHER SALARY AND A SHORT LIST OF BENEFITS.
THE COLLEGE THANKED HER AND OF BENEFITS.
THE COLLEGE THANKED HER AND RESCINDED ITS OFFER.
THE COLLEGE THANKED HER AND RESCINDED ITS OFFER.
SO LET'S START WITH THE BOSSY RESCINDED ITS OFFER.
SO LET'S START WITH THE BOSSY PART OF THIS DISCUSSION.
SO LET'S START WITH THE BOSSY PART OF THIS DISCUSSION.
IS SANDBERG RIGHT OR WRONG?
PART OF THIS DISCUSSION.
IS SANDBERG RIGHT OR WRONG?
>> I THINK ALL OF THE EFFORTS IS SANDBERG RIGHT OR WRONG?
>> I THINK ALL OF THE EFFORTS TOWARDS THIS ISSUE ALL OF THE >> I THINK ALL OF THE EFFORTS TOWARDS THIS ISSUE ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE GOOD THINGS BUT THIS TOWARDS THIS ISSUE ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE GOOD THINGS BUT THIS WAS AN ILL CONCEIVED WAY OF ABOVE ARE GOOD THINGS BUT THIS WAS AN ILL CONCEIVED WAY OF APPROACHING IT.
WAS AN ILL CONCEIVED WAY OF APPROACHING IT.
BOSSY WAS THE WRONG WORD AND APPROACHING IT.
BOSSY WAS THE WRONG WORD AND THERE ARE OTHER WORDS THAT BEGIN BOSSY WAS THE WRONG WORD AND THERE ARE OTHER WORDS THAT BEGIN WITH A B THAT WE COULD HAVE USED THERE ARE OTHER WORDS THAT BEGIN WITH A B THAT WE COULD HAVE USED FIRST.
WITH A B THAT WE COULD HAVE USED FIRST.
AND THE LARGER ISSUE -- FIRST.
AND THE LARGER ISSUE -- >> I CAN ONLY THINK OF ONE.
AND THE LARGER ISSUE -- >> I CAN ONLY THINK OF ONE.
>> LESS WOMAN IN THE MID-90s >> I CAN ONLY THINK OF ONE.
>> LESS WOMAN IN THE MID-90s WANT TO GO INTO LEADERSHIP AND I >> LESS WOMAN IN THE MID-90s WANT TO GO INTO LEADERSHIP AND I BLAME THE MEDIA.
WANT TO GO INTO LEADERSHIP AND I BLAME THE MEDIA.
THIS IS A BIGGER ISSUE THAT OUR BLAME THE MEDIA.
THIS IS A BIGGER ISSUE THAT OUR TEENS ARE CONSUMING THIS IS A BIGGER ISSUE THAT OUR TEENS ARE CONSUMING SEVEN-AND-A-HALF HOURS OF MEDIA TEENS ARE CONSUMING SEVEN-AND-A-HALF HOURS OF MEDIA A DAY AND THE MESSAGE YOUNG SEVEN-AND-A-HALF HOURS OF MEDIA A DAY AND THE MESSAGE YOUNG WOMEN AND GIRLS ARE GETTING THAT A DAY AND THE MESSAGE YOUNG WOMEN AND GIRLS ARE GETTING THAT THEY SHOULD NOT WANT TO LEAD FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS ARE GETTING THAT THEY SHOULD NOT WANT TO LEAD FOR MANY REASONS IT IS A BIG ISSUE.
THEY SHOULD NOT WANT TO LEAD FOR MANY REASONS IT IS A BIG ISSUE.
HOWEVER, I THINK THE WORD BOSSY MANY REASONS IT IS A BIG ISSUE.
HOWEVER, I THINK THE WORD BOSSY HAS A CONNOTATION FOR ME WHEN I HOWEVER, I THINK THE WORD BOSSY HAS A CONNOTATION FOR ME WHEN I HEARD IT OF THE GIRLS THAT WERE HAS A CONNOTATION FOR ME WHEN I HEARD IT OF THE GIRLS THAT WERE MEAN TO ME IN GRADE SCHOOL.
HEARD IT OF THE GIRLS THAT WERE MEAN TO ME IN GRADE SCHOOL.
AND BOSSY AND LEADERSHIP IN THE MEAN TO ME IN GRADE SCHOOL.
AND BOSSY AND LEADERSHIP IN THE GROWN-UP WORLD, BOSSY LEADERS AND BOSSY AND LEADERSHIP IN THE GROWN-UP WORLD, BOSSY LEADERS ARE NOT NECESSARILY GOOD GROWN-UP WORLD, BOSSY LEADERS ARE NOT NECESSARILY GOOD LEADERS.
ARE NOT NECESSARILY GOOD LEADERS.
I THINK AS WOMEN WE ARE GREAT LEADERS.
I THINK AS WOMEN WE ARE GREAT LEADERS AND PART OF WHAT WE DO I THINK AS WOMEN WE ARE GREAT LEADERS AND PART OF WHAT WE DO WELL IS TO BE COLLABORATIVE.
LEADERS AND PART OF WHAT WE DO WELL IS TO BE COLLABORATIVE.
I THINK IT WAS THE WRONG CHOICE WELL IS TO BE COLLABORATIVE.
I THINK IT WAS THE WRONG CHOICE OF A WORD AND THE CAMPAIGN IS -- I THINK IT WAS THE WRONG CHOICE OF A WORD AND THE CAMPAIGN IS -- >> IS THERE ANOTHER WORD?
OF A WORD AND THE CAMPAIGN IS -- >> IS THERE ANOTHER WORD?
>> I DO NOT BELIEVE THE WORDS.
>> IS THERE ANOTHER WORD?
>> I DO NOT BELIEVE THE WORDS.
I SPOKE AT GWU, AND THE WORDS >> I DO NOT BELIEVE THE WORDS.
I SPOKE AT GWU, AND THE WORDS USED AS INSULTS INCLUDING I SPOKE AT GWU, AND THE WORDS USED AS INSULTS INCLUDING ASSERTIVE.
USED AS INSULTS INCLUDING ASSERTIVE.
WE HAVE TO TRAIN YOUNG WOMEN TO ASSERTIVE.
WE HAVE TO TRAIN YOUNG WOMEN TO BE BETTER EVALUATORS OF WHAT IS WE HAVE TO TRAIN YOUNG WOMEN TO BE BETTER EVALUATORS OF WHAT IS BEING THROWN AT THEM AND BE BETTER EVALUATORS OF WHAT IS BEING THROWN AT THEM AND MESSAGING AND LET THEM BE BEING THROWN AT THEM AND MESSAGING AND LET THEM BE CONSCIOUS CONSUMERS WHAT IS MESSAGING AND LET THEM BE CONSCIOUS CONSUMERS WHAT IS AROUND THEM.
CONSCIOUS CONSUMERS WHAT IS AROUND THEM.
>> I THINK THIS IS MUCH ADO AROUND THEM.
>> I THINK THIS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
>> I THINK THIS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
I HAVE A LIST OF WORDS AND BOSSY ABOUT NOTHING.
I HAVE A LIST OF WORDS AND BOSSY IS WAY DOWN ON THE LISTMENT I I HAVE A LIST OF WORDS AND BOSSY IS WAY DOWN ON THE LISTMENT I RAISED A YOUNG WOMAN WHO IS IS WAY DOWN ON THE LISTMENT I RAISED A YOUNG WOMAN WHO IS STRONG AND AER IS ACTIVEP A RAISED A YOUNG WOMAN WHO IS STRONG AND AER IS ACTIVEP A LEADER AND ALL OF THAT.
STRONG AND AER IS ACTIVEP A LEADER AND ALL OF THAT.
AND OUT OF RESPECT FOR YOU, I LEADER AND ALL OF THAT.
AND OUT OF RESPECT FOR YOU, I WILL NOT LIST ALL OF THE WORDS.
AND OUT OF RESPECT FOR YOU, I WILL NOT LIST ALL OF THE WORDS.
>> I WILL NOT GET TO BOSSY.
WILL NOT LIST ALL OF THE WORDS.
>> I WILL NOT GET TO BOSSY.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY WHAT >> I WILL NOT GET TO BOSSY.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY WHAT KIND OF WOMEN ARE WE TRAINING BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY WHAT KIND OF WOMEN ARE WE TRAINING AND RAISING UP THAT CANNOT KIND OF WOMEN ARE WE TRAINING AND RAISING UP THAT CANNOT HANDLE THAT?
AND RAISING UP THAT CANNOT HANDLE THAT?
>> I ALSO AGREE.
HANDLE THAT?
>> I ALSO AGREE.
THIS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
>> I ALSO AGREE.
THIS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
ARE YOU TALKING TO A GIRL CALLED THIS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
ARE YOU TALKING TO A GIRL CALLED BOSSY GROWING UP.
ARE YOU TALKING TO A GIRL CALLED BOSSY GROWING UP.
BUT I WAS CALLED -- BOSSY GROWING UP.
BUT I WAS CALLED -- >> DID IT HELP YOU OR HURT YOU?
BUT I WAS CALLED -- >> DID IT HELP YOU OR HURT YOU?
>> I LANDED WHERE I AM BECAUSE I >> DID IT HELP YOU OR HURT YOU?
>> I LANDED WHERE I AM BECAUSE I TOOK CONTROL OF EVERY SITUATION >> I LANDED WHERE I AM BECAUSE I TOOK CONTROL OF EVERY SITUATION WITH MY SIBLINGS AND NEIGHBORS TOOK CONTROL OF EVERY SITUATION WITH MY SIBLINGS AND NEIGHBORS ANYBODY WHO WOULD LISTEN.
WITH MY SIBLINGS AND NEIGHBORS ANYBODY WHO WOULD LISTEN.
IT LAND ME UP WHERE I AM.
ANYBODY WHO WOULD LISTEN.
IT LAND ME UP WHERE I AM.
I DECIDED TO BE ASSERTIVE.
IT LAND ME UP WHERE I AM.
I DECIDED TO BE ASSERTIVE.
I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THIS I DECIDED TO BE ASSERTIVE.
I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THIS WHOLE THING.
I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THIS WHOLE THING.
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT FOR SHERYL WHOLE THING.
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT FOR SHERYL SANDBERG TO GET HER NAME OUT THIS IS AN ATTEMPT FOR SHERYL SANDBERG TO GET HER NAME OUT MORE.
SANDBERG TO GET HER NAME OUT MORE.
>> I HAVE A BETTER IDEA I SAW MORE.
>> I HAVE A BETTER IDEA I SAW LAST NIGHT BECAUSE I HAVE AN >> I HAVE A BETTER IDEA I SAW LAST NIGHT BECAUSE I HAVE AN EIGHT-YEAR-OLD GRANDCHILD LAST NIGHT BECAUSE I HAVE AN EIGHT-YEAR-OLD GRANDCHILD FROZEN.
EIGHT-YEAR-OLD GRANDCHILD FROZEN.
WE SHOULD HOLD HANDS AND SING FROZEN.
WE SHOULD HOLD HANDS AND SING "LET IT GO" AND THAT IS A BETTER WE SHOULD HOLD HANDS AND SING "LET IT GO" AND THAT IS A BETTER MESSAGE FOR YOUNG WOMEN TODAY.
"LET IT GO" AND THAT IS A BETTER MESSAGE FOR YOUNG WOMEN TODAY.
>> I THINK THAT CHERYL HAS THE MESSAGE FOR YOUNG WOMEN TODAY.
>> I THINK THAT CHERYL HAS THE BEST OF INTENTIONS.
>> I THINK THAT CHERYL HAS THE BEST OF INTENTIONS.
HOWEVER, I THINK THAT SHE HAS A BEST OF INTENTIONS.
HOWEVER, I THINK THAT SHE HAS A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING THE HOWEVER, I THINK THAT SHE HAS A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGES THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGES THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS GO THROUGH THAT DID NOT COME CHALLENGES THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS GO THROUGH THAT DID NOT COME FROM HER PRIVILEGED BACKGROUND.
GO THROUGH THAT DID NOT COME FROM HER PRIVILEGED BACKGROUND.
AND LIKE YOU SAID BOSSY IS DOWN FROM HER PRIVILEGED BACKGROUND.
AND LIKE YOU SAID BOSSY IS DOWN THE LIST.
AND LIKE YOU SAID BOSSY IS DOWN THE LIST.
INSTEAD OF BECOMING A CARD THE LIST.
INSTEAD OF BECOMING A CARD CARRYING MEMBER OF THE WORD INSTEAD OF BECOMING A CARD CARRYING MEMBER OF THE WORD POLICE I WOULD RATHER SHE FOCUS CARRYING MEMBER OF THE WORD POLICE I WOULD RATHER SHE FOCUS ON OTHER THINGS.
POLICE I WOULD RATHER SHE FOCUS ON OTHER THINGS.
>> SHE DID GET THE GIRL SCOUTS A ON OTHER THINGS.
>> SHE DID GET THE GIRL SCOUTS A FABULOUS ORGANIZATION.
>> SHE DID GET THE GIRL SCOUTS A FABULOUS ORGANIZATION.
TO GO IN WITH HER BUT WE ONLY FABULOUS ORGANIZATION.
TO GO IN WITH HER BUT WE ONLY HAVE A SMALL AMOUNT OF TIME LEFT TO GO IN WITH HER BUT WE ONLY HAVE A SMALL AMOUNT OF TIME LEFT IN TERMS OF THE PROFESSOR, WHO HAVE A SMALL AMOUNT OF TIME LEFT IN TERMS OF THE PROFESSOR, WHO TRIED TO GET THE JOB AT NAZARETH IN TERMS OF THE PROFESSOR, WHO TRIED TO GET THE JOB AT NAZARETH COLLEGE AND WAS TURNED DOWN SHE TRIED TO GET THE JOB AT NAZARETH COLLEGE AND WAS TURNED DOWN SHE WAS FOLLOWING THE LEAN IN COLLEGE AND WAS TURNED DOWN SHE WAS FOLLOWING THE LEAN IN ADVICE.
WAS FOLLOWING THE LEAN IN ADVICE.
WHAT HAPPENED?
ADVICE.
WHAT HAPPENED?
>> SHE LEANED TOO FAR.
WHAT HAPPENED?
>> SHE LEANED TOO FAR.
>> WHAT SHE DID WAS EXPOSE THE >> SHE LEANED TOO FAR.
>> WHAT SHE DID WAS EXPOSE THE SEXISM IN THE INDUSTRY OF TENURE >> WHAT SHE DID WAS EXPOSE THE SEXISM IN THE INDUSTRY OF TENURE TRACKED POSITIONS.
SEXISM IN THE INDUSTRY OF TENURE TRACKED POSITIONS.
IT IS NOT USUAL.
TRACKED POSITIONS.
IT IS NOT USUAL.
IT'S NOT COMMON THAT WOMEN HAVE IT IS NOT USUAL.
IT'S NOT COMMON THAT WOMEN HAVE ANY MATERNITY LEAVE IF YOU ARE A IT'S NOT COMMON THAT WOMEN HAVE ANY MATERNITY LEAVE IF YOU ARE A PROFESSOR THAT IS WHY I DECIDED ANY MATERNITY LEAVE IF YOU ARE A PROFESSOR THAT IS WHY I DECIDED TO HAVE A CHILD IN GRADUATE PROFESSOR THAT IS WHY I DECIDED TO HAVE A CHILD IN GRADUATE SCHOOL I KNEW THAT GOING IN.
TO HAVE A CHILD IN GRADUATE SCHOOL I KNEW THAT GOING IN.
THE INDUSTRY NEEDS TO BE CHANGED SCHOOL I KNEW THAT GOING IN.
THE INDUSTRY NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO BE MORE WOMAN-FRIENDLY.
THE INDUSTRY NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO BE MORE WOMAN-FRIENDLY.
>> VERY SAD THAT THAT HAPPENED.
TO BE MORE WOMAN-FRIENDLY.
>> VERY SAD THAT THAT HAPPENED.
AND I THINK IT WAS INTERESTING >> VERY SAD THAT THAT HAPPENED.
AND I THINK IT WAS INTERESTING THAT SHE FOLLOWED CHERYL'S LEAD AND I THINK IT WAS INTERESTING THAT SHE FOLLOWED CHERYL'S LEAD ON THAT AND THAT CAUSED HER TO THAT SHE FOLLOWED CHERYL'S LEAD ON THAT AND THAT CAUSED HER TO LOSE THIS THING IN THE END.
ON THAT AND THAT CAUSED HER TO LOSE THIS THING IN THE END.
BUT I THINK ALSO IT WAS A GOOD LOSE THIS THING IN THE END.
BUT I THINK ALSO IT WAS A GOOD MOVE.
BUT I THINK ALSO IT WAS A GOOD MOVE.
>> GOOD MOVE BY.
MOVE.
>> GOOD MOVE BY.
>> I THINK IT WAS A GOOD MOVE BY >> GOOD MOVE BY.
>> I THINK IT WAS A GOOD MOVE BY HER TO EMPLOY THAT TACTIC >> I THINK IT WAS A GOOD MOVE BY HER TO EMPLOY THAT TACTIC BECAUSE IT EXPOSED THAT AND IT'S HER TO EMPLOY THAT TACTIC BECAUSE IT EXPOSED THAT AND IT'S DONE SOMETHING POSITIVE.
BECAUSE IT EXPOSED THAT AND IT'S DONE SOMETHING POSITIVE.
>> AND WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR DONE SOMETHING POSITIVE.
>> AND WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR CULTURE.
>> AND WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR CULTURE.
WE NEED TO EMPOWER OUR YOUNG CULTURE.
WE NEED TO EMPOWER OUR YOUNG WOMEN AND TEACH THEM TO ASK FOR WE NEED TO EMPOWER OUR YOUNG WOMEN AND TEACH THEM TO ASK FOR THINGS AND FAIL AND MOVE ON.
WOMEN AND TEACH THEM TO ASK FOR THINGS AND FAIL AND MOVE ON.
AS WELL THERE IS A CULTURAL THINGS AND FAIL AND MOVE ON.
AS WELL THERE IS A CULTURAL ISSUE.
AS WELL THERE IS A CULTURAL ISSUE.
THAT IS A FALLACY.
ISSUE.
THAT IS A FALLACY.
YOU KNOW WE NEED TO HELP THEM THAT IS A FALLACY.
YOU KNOW WE NEED TO HELP THEM AND SAY THERE ARE PROBLEMS AND YOU KNOW WE NEED TO HELP THEM AND SAY THERE ARE PROBLEMS AND FAULTS IN THE SYSTEM WHAT YOU AND SAY THERE ARE PROBLEMS AND FAULTS IN THE SYSTEM WHAT YOU ARE FACING IS VALID AND THERE IS FAULTS IN THE SYSTEM WHAT YOU ARE FACING IS VALID AND THERE IS SEXISM AND WE ARE STABLE OR ARE FACING IS VALID AND THERE IS SEXISM AND WE ARE STABLE OR MOVING BACKWARDS BY MANY SEXISM AND WE ARE STABLE OR MOVING BACKWARDS BY MANY MEASURES AS WOMEN.
MOVING BACKWARDS BY MANY MEASURES AS WOMEN.
IT IS AN ALL OF THE ABOVE MEASURES AS WOMEN.
IT IS AN ALL OF THE ABOVE SOLUTION AND I BELIEVE LIKE IT IS AN ALL OF THE ABOVE SOLUTION AND I BELIEVE LIKE JOINING HANDS AND WE HAVE TO SOLUTION AND I BELIEVE LIKE JOINING HANDS AND WE HAVE TO HELP EACH OTHER.
JOINING HANDS AND WE HAVE TO HELP EACH OTHER.
POINT ONE WOMEN HAVE TO SUPPORT HELP EACH OTHER.
POINT ONE WOMEN HAVE TO SUPPORT OTHER WOMEN.
POINT ONE WOMEN HAVE TO SUPPORT OTHER WOMEN.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES FORMER OTHER WOMEN.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES FORMER WOMEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.
>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES FORMER WOMEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.
THIS WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH "TO WOMEN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.
THIS WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH "TO THE CONTRARY" SPOKE WITH FIVE THIS WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH "TO THE CONTRARY" SPOKE WITH FIVE WOMEN WHO SERVED IN THE HOUSE THE CONTRARY" SPOKE WITH FIVE WOMEN WHO SERVED IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE.
WOMEN WHO SERVED IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE.
THEY TALKED ABOUT THE PAST, AND SENATE.
THEY TALKED ABOUT THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF WOMEN THEY TALKED ABOUT THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF WOMEN LAWMAKERS.
PRESENT AND FUTURE OF WOMEN LAWMAKERS.
>> WHEN I WAS ELECTED IN 1986, LAWMAKERS.
>> WHEN I WAS ELECTED IN 1986, WE HAD 24 WOMEN ON THE HOUSE >> WHEN I WAS ELECTED IN 1986, WE HAD 24 WOMEN ON THE HOUSE SIDE AND TWO IN THE SENATE SIDE.
WE HAD 24 WOMEN ON THE HOUSE SIDE AND TWO IN THE SENATE SIDE.
>> THE FIRST DAY I CAME TO SIDE AND TWO IN THE SENATE SIDE.
>> THE FIRST DAY I CAME TO CONGRESS THERE WERE 21 WOMEN IN >> THE FIRST DAY I CAME TO CONGRESS THERE WERE 21 WOMEN IN THE HOUSE AND TWO WOMEN IN THE CONGRESS THERE WERE 21 WOMEN IN THE HOUSE AND TWO WOMEN IN THE SENATE.
THE HOUSE AND TWO WOMEN IN THE SENATE.
NOW THERE IS 99 WOMEN IN THE SENATE.
NOW THERE IS 99 WOMEN IN THE HOUSE AND THERE WERE THREE NOW THERE IS 99 WOMEN IN THE HOUSE AND THERE WERE THREE DELEGATES.
HOUSE AND THERE WERE THREE DELEGATES.
AND THERE ARE 20 WOMEN IN THE DELEGATES.
AND THERE ARE 20 WOMEN IN THE SENATE.
AND THERE ARE 20 WOMEN IN THE SENATE.
>> WOMEN ARE WINNING OFFICE IN SENATE.
>> WOMEN ARE WINNING OFFICE IN RECORD NUMBERS.
>> WOMEN ARE WINNING OFFICE IN RECORD NUMBERS.
BUT, A SIGNIFICANT GENDER GAP RECORD NUMBERS.
BUT, A SIGNIFICANT GENDER GAP PERSISTS.
BUT, A SIGNIFICANT GENDER GAP PERSISTS.
JUST ASK FORMER HOUSE MEMBERS PERSISTS.
JUST ASK FORMER HOUSE MEMBERS CONNIE MORELLA, BARBARA KENNELLY JUST ASK FORMER HOUSE MEMBERS CONNIE MORELLA, BARBARA KENNELLY AND MARY BONO THEY JOINED FORMER CONNIE MORELLA, BARBARA KENNELLY AND MARY BONO THEY JOINED FORMER SENATORS BLANCHE LINCOLN AND AND MARY BONO THEY JOINED FORMER SENATORS BLANCHE LINCOLN AND CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN TO DISCUSS SENATORS BLANCHE LINCOLN AND CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN TO DISCUSS WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP AT A FORUM CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN TO DISCUSS WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP AT A FORUM HOSTED BY THE FOUNDATION FOR THE WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP AT A FORUM HOSTED BY THE FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
HOSTED BY THE FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
>> I RAN FOR THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
>> I RAN FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
>> I RAN FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
AND BECAME THE YOUNGEST WOMAN IN SENATE.
AND BECAME THE YOUNGEST WOMAN IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY TO AND BECAME THE YOUNGEST WOMAN IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY TO SERVE IN THE UNITED STATES THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY TO SERVE IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
SERVE IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
SO IT'S STILL A TITLE NOW TO BE SENATE.
SO IT'S STILL A TITLE NOW TO BE BROKEN.
SO IT'S STILL A TITLE NOW TO BE BROKEN.
TO ALL YOU YOUNG WOMEN OUT BROKEN.
TO ALL YOU YOUNG WOMEN OUT THERE.
TO ALL YOU YOUNG WOMEN OUT THERE.
>> LINCOLN REMEMBERS DISCUSSING THERE.
>> LINCOLN REMEMBERS DISCUSSING DAYCARE AS A NEW SENATOR.
>> LINCOLN REMEMBERS DISCUSSING DAYCARE AS A NEW SENATOR.
A MALE COLLEAGUE ASKED QUOTE DAYCARE AS A NEW SENATOR.
A MALE COLLEAGUE ASKED QUOTE CAN'T THE GRANDPARENTS TAKE CARE A MALE COLLEAGUE ASKED QUOTE CAN'T THE GRANDPARENTS TAKE CARE OF THE KIDS?
CAN'T THE GRANDPARENTS TAKE CARE OF THE KIDS?
MARY BONO WHO BEGAN HER OF THE KIDS?
MARY BONO WHO BEGAN HER POLITICAL CAREER AFTER HER MARY BONO WHO BEGAN HER POLITICAL CAREER AFTER HER HUSBAND, SONY BONO DIED IN A POLITICAL CAREER AFTER HER HUSBAND, SONY BONO DIED IN A SKIING ACCIDENT REMEMBERS THERE HUSBAND, SONY BONO DIED IN A SKIING ACCIDENT REMEMBERS THERE WAS NO EASILY ACCESSIBLE LADIES SKIING ACCIDENT REMEMBERS THERE WAS NO EASILY ACCESSIBLE LADIES ROOM.
WAS NO EASILY ACCESSIBLE LADIES ROOM.
>> YOU WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW ROOM.
>> YOU WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW THERE IS A LADIES BATHROOM OFF >> YOU WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW THERE IS A LADIES BATHROOM OFF THE FLOOR SO YOU CAN GET TO THE THERE IS A LADIES BATHROOM OFF THE FLOOR SO YOU CAN GET TO THE BATHROOM DURING A VOTE AND MAKE THE FLOOR SO YOU CAN GET TO THE BATHROOM DURING A VOTE AND MAKE IT BACK AND THERE IS A WOMEN'S BATHROOM DURING A VOTE AND MAKE IT BACK AND THERE IS A WOMEN'S GYM.
IT BACK AND THERE IS A WOMEN'S GYM.
>> WE HAD THE HEIGHT OF WOMEN GYM.
>> WE HAD THE HEIGHT OF WOMEN COMING INTO CONGRESS IN 1992.
>> WE HAD THE HEIGHT OF WOMEN COMING INTO CONGRESS IN 1992.
WE CALL THAT THE YEAR OF THE COMING INTO CONGRESS IN 1992.
WE CALL THAT THE YEAR OF THE WOMAN.
WE CALL THAT THE YEAR OF THE WOMAN.
24 NEW WOMEN WERE ELECTED.
WOMAN.
24 NEW WOMEN WERE ELECTED.
AND MANY OF US HOPEFULLY AND 24 NEW WOMEN WERE ELECTED.
AND MANY OF US HOPEFULLY AND BELIEVED THAT THIS IS GOING TO AND MANY OF US HOPEFULLY AND BELIEVED THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE THE START OF KIND OF AN BELIEVED THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE THE START OF KIND OF AN ACCELERATION OF THE NUMBER OF BE THE START OF KIND OF AN ACCELERATION OF THE NUMBER OF WOMEN POSSIBLY TO THE PERCENTAGE ACCELERATION OF THE NUMBER OF WOMEN POSSIBLY TO THE PERCENTAGE OR CLOSE TO IT.
WOMEN POSSIBLY TO THE PERCENTAGE OR CLOSE TO IT.
UNFORTUNATELY IT HASN'T OR CLOSE TO IT.
UNFORTUNATELY IT HASN'T HAPPENED.
UNFORTUNATELY IT HASN'T HAPPENED.
>> THERE IS STILL A GENDER GAP.
HAPPENED.
>> THERE IS STILL A GENDER GAP.
WOMEN ARE HALF THE POPULATION >> THERE IS STILL A GENDER GAP.
WOMEN ARE HALF THE POPULATION AND IN A DEMOCRACY, GOVERNMENT WOMEN ARE HALF THE POPULATION AND IN A DEMOCRACY, GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE, RIGHT TO ME AND IN A DEMOCRACY, GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE, RIGHT TO ME SUGGESTS THAT WOMEN SHOULD BE BY THE PEOPLE, RIGHT TO ME SUGGESTS THAT WOMEN SHOULD BE EQUALLY REPRESENTED IN BOTH ALL SUGGESTS THAT WOMEN SHOULD BE EQUALLY REPRESENTED IN BOTH ALL OF THE LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT THE EQUALLY REPRESENTED IN BOTH ALL OF THE LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT THE NATIONAL STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS.
OF THE LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT THE NATIONAL STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS.
YOU THINK THAT WE WOULD HAVE NATIONAL STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS.
YOU THINK THAT WE WOULD HAVE 50/50 BY NOW AND WE DON'T.
YOU THINK THAT WE WOULD HAVE 50/50 BY NOW AND WE DON'T.
WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN THE UNITED 50/50 BY NOW AND WE DON'T.
WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS NOT BECAUSE THEY WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SMARTER NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE STATES CONGRESS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SMARTER NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE PRETTIER BUT THEY HAVE A ARE SMARTER NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE PRETTIER BUT THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.
PRETTIER BUT THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.
>> WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.
>> WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO CONSIDER RUNNING FOR OFFICE THAN >> WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO CONSIDER RUNNING FOR OFFICE THAN MEN.
CONSIDER RUNNING FOR OFFICE THAN MEN.
ONE REASON IS HEIGHTENED MEN.
ONE REASON IS HEIGHTENED PARTISANSHIP.
ONE REASON IS HEIGHTENED PARTISANSHIP.
>> POLARIZATION IN CONGRESS HAS PARTISANSHIP.
>> POLARIZATION IN CONGRESS HAS DISCOURAGED WOMEN FROM RUNNING.
>> POLARIZATION IN CONGRESS HAS DISCOURAGED WOMEN FROM RUNNING.
IT HAS ALSO DISCOURAGED PEOPLE DISCOURAGED WOMEN FROM RUNNING.
IT HAS ALSO DISCOURAGED PEOPLE FROM TELLING AND SUPPORTING IT HAS ALSO DISCOURAGED PEOPLE FROM TELLING AND SUPPORTING WOMEN TO RUN.
FROM TELLING AND SUPPORTING WOMEN TO RUN.
AND WHEN THEY SEE THE CAUSTIC WOMEN TO RUN.
AND WHEN THEY SEE THE CAUSTIC RHETORIC OF CAMPAIGNS THEY SAY I AND WHEN THEY SEE THE CAUSTIC RHETORIC OF CAMPAIGNS THEY SAY I DON'T WANT TO EXPOSE MYSELF TO RHETORIC OF CAMPAIGNS THEY SAY I DON'T WANT TO EXPOSE MYSELF TO THAT LET ALONE MY FAMILY.
DON'T WANT TO EXPOSE MYSELF TO THAT LET ALONE MY FAMILY.
AND SO, I THINK THE ENVIRONMENT THAT LET ALONE MY FAMILY.
AND SO, I THINK THE ENVIRONMENT IS SUCH THAT IT IS NOT AND SO, I THINK THE ENVIRONMENT IS SUCH THAT IT IS NOT ENCOURAGING WOMEN.
IS SUCH THAT IT IS NOT ENCOURAGING WOMEN.
>> UNFORTUNATELY, THE PARTIES DO ENCOURAGING WOMEN.
>> UNFORTUNATELY, THE PARTIES DO NOT GET ALONG LIKE THEY USED TO.
>> UNFORTUNATELY, THE PARTIES DO NOT GET ALONG LIKE THEY USED TO.
THAT IS REALLY TOO BAD.
NOT GET ALONG LIKE THEY USED TO.
THAT IS REALLY TOO BAD.
BUT I DO NOT THINK IT HAS TO THAT IS REALLY TOO BAD.
BUT I DO NOT THINK IT HAS TO CONTINUE.
BUT I DO NOT THINK IT HAS TO CONTINUE.
>> WOMEN IF ELECTED COULD BE THE CONTINUE.
>> WOMEN IF ELECTED COULD BE THE SOLUTION.
>> WOMEN IF ELECTED COULD BE THE SOLUTION.
>> THEIR ABILITY TO HELP BRIDGE SOLUTION.
>> THEIR ABILITY TO HELP BRIDGE THE DIFFERENCES, AS WELL AS >> THEIR ABILITY TO HELP BRIDGE THE DIFFERENCES, AS WELL AS BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE THAT THE DIFFERENCES, AS WELL AS BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT WOMEN DO.
BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT WOMEN DO.
THEY BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE IS WHAT WOMEN DO.
THEY BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE THEY WORK AS A TEAM.
THEY BUILD FRIENDSHIPS BECAUSE THEY WORK AS A TEAM.
AND I THINK THAT IS A GREAT WILL THEY WORK AS A TEAM.
AND I THINK THAT IS A GREAT WILL EXAMPLE THAT THEY CAN SET IN THE AND I THINK THAT IS A GREAT WILL EXAMPLE THAT THEY CAN SET IN THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE.
EXAMPLE THAT THEY CAN SET IN THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE.
>> BUT WOMEN ON THE SAME SIDE OF SENATE AND THE HOUSE.
>> BUT WOMEN ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE AISLE AREN'T MONOLITHIC.
>> BUT WOMEN ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE AISLE AREN'T MONOLITHIC.
THEY KNOW HOW TO DEBATE THE THE AISLE AREN'T MONOLITHIC.
THEY KNOW HOW TO DEBATE THE ISSUES.
THEY KNOW HOW TO DEBATE THE ISSUES.
RECENTLY, THE SENATE TOOK UP TWO ISSUES.
RECENTLY, THE SENATE TOOK UP TWO DIFFERENT BILLS TO CURB SEXUAL RECENTLY, THE SENATE TOOK UP TWO DIFFERENT BILLS TO CURB SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE MILITARY BOTH DIFFERENT BILLS TO CURB SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE MILITARY BOTH WERE CRAFTED BY WOMEN.
ASSAULT IN THE MILITARY BOTH WERE CRAFTED BY WOMEN.
>> WOMEN ARE EQUALLY CAPABLE OF WERE CRAFTED BY WOMEN.
>> WOMEN ARE EQUALLY CAPABLE OF POLITICAL BACK AND FORTH AND >> WOMEN ARE EQUALLY CAPABLE OF POLITICAL BACK AND FORTH AND FIGHTING FOR THEIR POINTS OF POLITICAL BACK AND FORTH AND FIGHTING FOR THEIR POINTS OF VIEW.
FIGHTING FOR THEIR POINTS OF VIEW.
SO IN SOME RESPECTS I DO NOT VIEW.
SO IN SOME RESPECTS I DO NOT BELIEVE WOMEN ARE THE WEAKER SEX SO IN SOME RESPECTS I DO NOT BELIEVE WOMEN ARE THE WEAKER SEX WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICAL BELIEVE WOMEN ARE THE WEAKER SEX WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICAL FIGHTING AND THAT A GREAT THING.
WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICAL FIGHTING AND THAT A GREAT THING.
>> IT IS NOT A FIGHTING AND THAT A GREAT THING.
>> IT IS NOT A ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL.
>> IT IS NOT A ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL.
WOMEN RANGE IN TERMS OF VIEWS ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL.
WOMEN RANGE IN TERMS OF VIEWS THE SAME WAY THAT MEN DO.
WOMEN RANGE IN TERMS OF VIEWS THE SAME WAY THAT MEN DO.
YOU WILL SEE THE SAME KINDS OF THE SAME WAY THAT MEN DO.
YOU WILL SEE THE SAME KINDS OF DIFFERENTIATION AMONG WOMEN.
YOU WILL SEE THE SAME KINDS OF DIFFERENTIATION AMONG WOMEN.
>> PEOPLE THOUGHT BECAUSE WE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG WOMEN.
>> PEOPLE THOUGHT BECAUSE WE WERE WOMEN WE WERE ALL ALIKE AND >> PEOPLE THOUGHT BECAUSE WE WERE WOMEN WE WERE ALL ALIKE AND THAT IS NOT THE CASE WE ARE ALL WERE WOMEN WE WERE ALL ALIKE AND THAT IS NOT THE CASE WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.
THAT IS NOT THE CASE WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.
WE COME FROM DIFFERENT DIFFERENT.
WE COME FROM DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS AND REGIONS.
WE COME FROM DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS AND REGIONS.
>> BECAUSE OF ALL THIS BACKGROUNDS AND REGIONS.
>> BECAUSE OF ALL THIS DISAGREEMENT IN CONGRESS PEOPLE >> BECAUSE OF ALL THIS DISAGREEMENT IN CONGRESS PEOPLE SAY WHY WOULD ANYBODY GO INTO DISAGREEMENT IN CONGRESS PEOPLE SAY WHY WOULD ANYBODY GO INTO POLITICS.
SAY WHY WOULD ANYBODY GO INTO POLITICS.
THIS IS A VERY GOOD OPPORTUNITY POLITICS.
THIS IS A VERY GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN TO RUN WE CAN DO THIS IS A VERY GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN TO RUN WE CAN DO BETTER IF THERE WERE MORE WOMEN FOR WOMEN TO RUN WE CAN DO BETTER IF THERE WERE MORE WOMEN THERE.
BETTER IF THERE WERE MORE WOMEN THERE.
>> WHY IS IT THAT THIS AVIS THERE.
>> WHY IS IT THAT THIS AVIS JONES DEWEEVER THAT THIS GAP >> WHY IS IT THAT THIS AVIS JONES DEWEEVER THAT THIS GAP PERSISTS?
JONES DEWEEVER THAT THIS GAP PERSISTS?
WE HAVE MADE PROGRESS AND IT'S PERSISTS?
WE HAVE MADE PROGRESS AND IT'S BEEN STALLED FOR A WHILE IN THE WE HAVE MADE PROGRESS AND IT'S BEEN STALLED FOR A WHILE IN THE PAY GAP BUT YOU KNOW, 20% AND BEEN STALLED FOR A WHILE IN THE PAY GAP BUT YOU KNOW, 20% AND THERE'S SO MANY OTHER DEVELOPING PAY GAP BUT YOU KNOW, 20% AND THERE'S SO MANY OTHER DEVELOPING NATIONS THAT HAVE HAD FEMALE THERE'S SO MANY OTHER DEVELOPING NATIONS THAT HAVE HAD FEMALE PRESIDENTS AND PRIME MINISTERS.
NATIONS THAT HAVE HAD FEMALE PRESIDENTS AND PRIME MINISTERS.
SO.
PRESIDENTS AND PRIME MINISTERS.
SO.
>> EXACTLY.
SO.
>> EXACTLY.
IN AMERICA WE LAG FAR BEHIND >> EXACTLY.
IN AMERICA WE LAG FAR BEHIND WHEN IT COMES TO WOMEN'S IN AMERICA WE LAG FAR BEHIND WHEN IT COMES TO WOMEN'S REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS AND WHEN IT COMES TO WOMEN'S REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REASONS.
REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REASONS.
>> IN POLITICS IN GENERAL.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REASONS.
>> IN POLITICS IN GENERAL.
>> EXACTLY.
>> IN POLITICS IN GENERAL.
>> EXACTLY.
AND PART OF WHICH IS THAT >> EXACTLY.
AND PART OF WHICH IS THAT SOMETIMES WOMEN DON'T FIRST OF AND PART OF WHICH IS THAT SOMETIMES WOMEN DON'T FIRST OF ALL WOMEN ARE NOT ASKED NOT SOMETIMES WOMEN DON'T FIRST OF ALL WOMEN ARE NOT ASKED NOT RECRUITED AT THE SAME RATE AS ALL WOMEN ARE NOT ASKED NOT RECRUITED AT THE SAME RATE AS MEN.
RECRUITED AT THE SAME RATE AS MEN.
OFTENTIMES WHEN THEY JUMP INTO MEN.
OFTENTIMES WHEN THEY JUMP INTO THE FRAY THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTED OFTENTIMES WHEN THEY JUMP INTO THE FRAY THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTED LOTS OF TIMES BY THE TRADITIONAL THE FRAY THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTED LOTS OF TIMES BY THE TRADITIONAL PARTY MECHANISMS THAT MEN ARE.
LOTS OF TIMES BY THE TRADITIONAL PARTY MECHANISMS THAT MEN ARE.
AND SOMETIMES WOMEN ARE LESS PARTY MECHANISMS THAT MEN ARE.
AND SOMETIMES WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO BELIEVE THEY ARE AND SOMETIMES WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO BELIEVE THEY ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN EVEN IF THEY LIKELY TO BELIEVE THEY ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN EVEN IF THEY HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS THAT MEN QUALIFIED TO RUN EVEN IF THEY HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS THAT MEN WHO DO RUN AND SUCCEED.
HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS THAT MEN WHO DO RUN AND SUCCEED.
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE THAT WE NEED WHO DO RUN AND SUCCEED.
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS INSTITUTIONAL THIS IS AN EXAMPLE THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS AND INDIVIDUAL BARRIERS TO ADDRESS INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS AND INDIVIDUAL BARRIERS THAT KEEP WOMEN FROM THROWING BARRIERS AND INDIVIDUAL BARRIERS THAT KEEP WOMEN FROM THROWING THEIR HATS INTO THE RING.
THAT KEEP WOMEN FROM THROWING THEIR HATS INTO THE RING.
>> HOW DO YOU ADDRESS IT?
THEIR HATS INTO THE RING.
>> HOW DO YOU ADDRESS IT?
>> WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE >> HOW DO YOU ADDRESS IT?
>> WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PARTIES ARE PUSHED TO RECRUIT >> WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PARTIES ARE PUSHED TO RECRUIT MORE WOMEN AND SUPPORT THE WOMEN PARTIES ARE PUSHED TO RECRUIT MORE WOMEN AND SUPPORT THE WOMEN OUT THERE RUNNING FOR THEIR MORE WOMEN AND SUPPORT THE WOMEN OUT THERE RUNNING FOR THEIR POSITIONS.
OUT THERE RUNNING FOR THEIR POSITIONS.
AND WE NEED TO GO AROUND AND POSITIONS.
AND WE NEED TO GO AROUND AND EDUCATE WOMEN AS TO THE AND WE NEED TO GO AROUND AND EDUCATE WOMEN AS TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THEIR VOICE AND EDUCATE WOMEN AS TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THEIR VOICE AND PROVIDING THEM WITH THE SUPPORT IMPORTANCE OF THEIR VOICE AND PROVIDING THEM WITH THE SUPPORT THEY NEED TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN PROVIDING THEM WITH THE SUPPORT THEY NEED TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN THEIR RUNS.
THEY NEED TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN THEIR RUNS.
>> WHAT SHE SAID.
THEIR RUNS.
>> WHAT SHE SAID.
>> BUT YOU KNOW, THE DNC HAS HAD >> WHAT SHE SAID.
>> BUT YOU KNOW, THE DNC HAS HAD RECRUITING AND PREPARING WOMEN >> BUT YOU KNOW, THE DNC HAS HAD RECRUITING AND PREPARING WOMEN PROGRAMS FOR 20 OR MORE YEARS RECRUITING AND PREPARING WOMEN PROGRAMS FOR 20 OR MORE YEARS THAT THE RNC FOR THE LAST FIVE PROGRAMS FOR 20 OR MORE YEARS THAT THE RNC FOR THE LAST FIVE OR 10.
THAT THE RNC FOR THE LAST FIVE OR 10.
>> THEY HAVE.
OR 10.
>> THEY HAVE.
AND I THINK BOTH PARTIES NOW >> THEY HAVE.
AND I THINK BOTH PARTIES NOW RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF AND I THINK BOTH PARTIES NOW RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF DOING THAT PARTICULARLY WITH THE RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF DOING THAT PARTICULARLY WITH THE GENDER GAP.
DOING THAT PARTICULARLY WITH THE GENDER GAP.
BUT HAVING SAID THAT I THINK GENDER GAP.
BUT HAVING SAID THAT I THINK THERE IS ENTRENCHED MECHANISMS BUT HAVING SAID THAT I THINK THERE IS ENTRENCHED MECHANISMS AND IN BOTH PARTIES AND IT TENDS THERE IS ENTRENCHED MECHANISMS AND IN BOTH PARTIES AND IT TENDS TO BE MORE WHOSE TURN IS IT WHO AND IN BOTH PARTIES AND IT TENDS TO BE MORE WHOSE TURN IS IT WHO IS UP NEXT AND THE GOOD OLD BOY TO BE MORE WHOSE TURN IS IT WHO IS UP NEXT AND THE GOOD OLD BOY NETWORK TENDS TO PICK THE IS UP NEXT AND THE GOOD OLD BOY NETWORK TENDS TO PICK THE CANDIDATES RATHER THAN LOOKING NETWORK TENDS TO PICK THE CANDIDATES RATHER THAN LOOKING AT AN OPEN PROCESS.
CANDIDATES RATHER THAN LOOKING AT AN OPEN PROCESS.
BUT THINGS ARE SO BAD RIGHT NOW, AT AN OPEN PROCESS.
BUT THINGS ARE SO BAD RIGHT NOW, THAT I THINK THAT -- BUT THINGS ARE SO BAD RIGHT NOW, THAT I THINK THAT -- >> FOR REPUBLICANS AND WOMEN YOU THAT I THINK THAT -- >> FOR REPUBLICANS AND WOMEN YOU MEAN?
>> FOR REPUBLICANS AND WOMEN YOU MEAN?
>> YEAH.
MEAN?
>> YEAH.
YOU KNOW.
>> YEAH.
YOU KNOW.
IF YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN WOMAN YOU KNOW.
IF YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN WOMAN AND WANT TO RUN, YOU PRETTY MUCH IF YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN WOMAN AND WANT TO RUN, YOU PRETTY MUCH COULD.
AND WANT TO RUN, YOU PRETTY MUCH COULD.
AND I ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO DO COULD.
AND I ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO DO JUST THAT.
AND I ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO DO JUST THAT.
>> AND YOU DO THINK THE PARTY JUST THAT.
>> AND YOU DO THINK THE PARTY WOULD BE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY >> AND YOU DO THINK THE PARTY WOULD BE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WOULD BE MORE SUPPORTIVE OF WOULD BE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WOULD BE MORE SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN?
WOULD BE MORE SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN?
>> I THINK THAT WHERE WE ARE WOMEN?
>> I THINK THAT WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WITH THE REPUBLICAN >> I THINK THAT WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, THE RECOGNITION IS THERE.
RIGHT NOW WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, THE RECOGNITION IS THERE.
WE'VE GOT TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
PARTY, THE RECOGNITION IS THERE.
WE'VE GOT TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
AND I THINK THAT WOMEN ARE WE'VE GOT TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
AND I THINK THAT WOMEN ARE WELCOMED INTO THE PARTY AND I THINK THAT WOMEN ARE WELCOMED INTO THE PARTY LEADERSHIP, WELCOMED INTO THE WELCOMED INTO THE PARTY LEADERSHIP, WELCOMED INTO THE ROLE AS CANDIDATE, AND THERE'S LEADERSHIP, WELCOMED INTO THE ROLE AS CANDIDATE, AND THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME AND I ROLE AS CANDIDATE, AND THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME AND I HOPE WE SEE THAT IS THE NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME AND I HOPE WE SEE THAT IS THE INSTITUTIONAL PIECE.
HOPE WE SEE THAT IS THE INSTITUTIONAL PIECE.
AND THE INDIVIDUAL SIDE I HOPE INSTITUTIONAL PIECE.
AND THE INDIVIDUAL SIDE I HOPE THE WOMEN WILL STEP FORWARD AND AND THE INDIVIDUAL SIDE I HOPE THE WOMEN WILL STEP FORWARD AND ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE.
THE WOMEN WILL STEP FORWARD AND ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE.
>> DO YOU EVER THINK ABOUT ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE.
>> DO YOU EVER THINK ABOUT RUNNING FOR OFFICE?
>> DO YOU EVER THINK ABOUT RUNNING FOR OFFICE?
>> I HAVE.
RUNNING FOR OFFICE?
>> I HAVE.
BUT AS I'VE TRAVELED THE COUNTRY >> I HAVE.
BUT AS I'VE TRAVELED THE COUNTRY TALKING WITH POTENTIAL FIRST BUT AS I'VE TRAVELED THE COUNTRY TALKING WITH POTENTIAL FIRST TIME CANDIDATES MAINLY WOMEN, TALKING WITH POTENTIAL FIRST TIME CANDIDATES MAINLY WOMEN, I'VE SAT DOWN AND SAID ARE YOU TIME CANDIDATES MAINLY WOMEN, I'VE SAT DOWN AND SAID ARE YOU THINKING WHAT THIS IS GOING TO I'VE SAT DOWN AND SAID ARE YOU THINKING WHAT THIS IS GOING TO DO TO YOUR LIFE?
THINKING WHAT THIS IS GOING TO DO TO YOUR LIFE?
AND THE NUMBER ONE ANSWER IS NO, DO TO YOUR LIFE?
AND THE NUMBER ONE ANSWER IS NO, I HAVE NOT THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
AND THE NUMBER ONE ANSWER IS NO, I HAVE NOT THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
AND WE SIT DOWN AND LOOK AT WHAT I HAVE NOT THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
AND WE SIT DOWN AND LOOK AT WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE AND LAYOUT AND WE SIT DOWN AND LOOK AT WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE AND LAYOUT THE CAMPAIGN PLAN AND SEE WHO IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE AND LAYOUT THE CAMPAIGN PLAN AND SEE WHO THE FARM TEAM IS ALL THE FUN THE CAMPAIGN PLAN AND SEE WHO THE FARM TEAM IS ALL THE FUN STUFF THAT GOES INTO PUTTING ON THE FARM TEAM IS ALL THE FUN STUFF THAT GOES INTO PUTTING ON A CAMPAIGN.
STUFF THAT GOES INTO PUTTING ON A CAMPAIGN.
AND WE GET THE ANSWERS I DON'T A CAMPAIGN.
AND WE GET THE ANSWERS I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME FOR AND WE GET THE ANSWERS I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME FOR ME.
THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME FOR ME.
AND THAT IS DISAPPOINTING.
ME.
AND THAT IS DISAPPOINTING.
BECAUSE THEY NEVER THINK IT'S AND THAT IS DISAPPOINTING.
BECAUSE THEY NEVER THINK IT'S THE RIGHT TIME.
BECAUSE THEY NEVER THINK IT'S THE RIGHT TIME.
MY KIDS MY LIFE WHAT ARE THEY THE RIGHT TIME.
MY KIDS MY LIFE WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO SAY ABOUT ME I HAVE MY KIDS MY LIFE WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO SAY ABOUT ME I HAVE THIS IN THE CLOSET.
GOING TO SAY ABOUT ME I HAVE THIS IN THE CLOSET.
>> AND FIRST OF ALL WE HAVE TO THIS IN THE CLOSET.
>> AND FIRST OF ALL WE HAVE TO HELP OUR REPUBLICAN WOMEN GET >> AND FIRST OF ALL WE HAVE TO HELP OUR REPUBLICAN WOMEN GET MORE WOMEN TO OFFICE AFTER THE HELP OUR REPUBLICAN WOMEN GET MORE WOMEN TO OFFICE AFTER THE LAST ELECTION 30% OF DEMOCRATS MORE WOMEN TO OFFICE AFTER THE LAST ELECTION 30% OF DEMOCRATS THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS ARE LAST ELECTION 30% OF DEMOCRATS THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS ARE WOMEN.
THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS ARE WOMEN.
SO THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE A WOMEN.
SO THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB AND MY ORGANIZATION SO THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB AND MY ORGANIZATION IS TO HELP REPUBLICANS WORK ON BETTER JOB AND MY ORGANIZATION IS TO HELP REPUBLICANS WORK ON THAT ISSUE AND I HOPE THEY DO.
IS TO HELP REPUBLICANS WORK ON THAT ISSUE AND I HOPE THEY DO.
AND IT GOES DOWN TO THE THAT ISSUE AND I HOPE THEY DO.
AND IT GOES DOWN TO THE LEADERSHIP.
AND IT GOES DOWN TO THE LEADERSHIP.
WOMEN WANTS TO GET INTO LEADERSHIP.
WOMEN WANTS TO GET INTO LEADERSHIP IT'S NOT ONLY IN WOMEN WANTS TO GET INTO LEADERSHIP IT'S NOT ONLY IN POLITICS BUT AN ISSUE WITH THE LEADERSHIP IT'S NOT ONLY IN POLITICS BUT AN ISSUE WITH THE GENERATION THAT WE NEED TO POLITICS BUT AN ISSUE WITH THE GENERATION THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS TO ENCOURAGE THEM THE GENERATION THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS TO ENCOURAGE THEM THE LEADERSHIP NUMBERS HAVE GONE ADDRESS TO ENCOURAGE THEM THE LEADERSHIP NUMBERS HAVE GONE DOWN SINCE THE MID-90s AGAIN LEADERSHIP NUMBERS HAVE GONE DOWN SINCE THE MID-90s AGAIN IN CORPORATE AMERICA AS WELL AND DOWN SINCE THE MID-90s AGAIN IN CORPORATE AMERICA AS WELL AND WE NEED TO PULL UP WOMEN LIKE IN CORPORATE AMERICA AS WELL AND WE NEED TO PULL UP WOMEN LIKE SENATOR GILL BRAND IS DOING.
WE NEED TO PULL UP WOMEN LIKE SENATOR GILL BRAND IS DOING.
>> TERRIFIC WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
SENATOR GILL BRAND IS DOING.
>> TERRIFIC WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
THAT IT FOR THIS EDITION.
>> TERRIFIC WE ARE OUT OF TIME.
THAT IT FOR THIS EDITION.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT THAT IT FOR THIS EDITION.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/"TO THE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/"TO THE CONTRARY" AND SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.
♪]
