GWEN: A PRESIDENTIAL MEA CULPA ON HEALTH CARE.
LIT STOP THE BLEEDING OR COST ON HEALTH CARE.
LIT STOP THE BLEEDING OR COST HIM THE CREDIBILITY HE NEEDS ON LIT STOP THE BLEEDING OR COST HIM THE CREDIBILITY HE NEEDS ON OTHER ISSUES LIKE IRAN?
HIM THE CREDIBILITY HE NEEDS ON OTHER ISSUES LIKE IRAN?
TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
OTHER ISSUES LIKE IRAN?
TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
THE PRESIDENT FALLS ON HIS TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
THE PRESIDENT FALLS ON HIS SWORD.
THE PRESIDENT FALLS ON HIS SWORD.
>> ULTIMATELY I'M THE HEAD OF SWORD.
>> ULTIMATELY I'M THE HEAD OF THIS TEAM.
>> ULTIMATELY I'M THE HEAD OF THIS TEAM.
WE DID FUMBLE THE BALL ON IT AND THIS TEAM.
WE DID FUMBLE THE BALL ON IT AND WHAT I'M GOING TO DO IS MAKE WE DID FUMBLE THE BALL ON IT AND WHAT I'M GOING TO DO IS MAKE SURE THAT WE GET IT FIXED.
WHAT I'M GOING TO DO IS MAKE SURE THAT WE GET IT FIXED.
GWEN: AND HIS OPPONENTS SMELL SURE THAT WE GET IT FIXED.
GWEN: AND HIS OPPONENTS SMELL BLOOD.
GWEN: AND HIS OPPONENTS SMELL BLOOD.
>> THIS WASN'T A SMALL MISTAKE.
BLOOD.
>> THIS WASN'T A SMALL MISTAKE.
THIS WASN'T A SCALING MISTAKE.
>> THIS WASN'T A SMALL MISTAKE.
THIS WASN'T A SCALING MISTAKE.
THIS WAS A MONUMENTAL THIS WASN'T A SCALING MISTAKE.
THIS WAS A MONUMENTAL TO GO LIVE AND EFFECTIVELY THIS WAS A MONUMENTAL TO GO LIVE AND EFFECTIVELY EXPLODE ON THE LAUNCH PAD.
TO GO LIVE AND EFFECTIVELY EXPLODE ON THE LAUNCH PAD.
GWEN: EVEN BEFORE THE EXPLODE ON THE LAUNCH PAD.
GWEN: EVEN BEFORE THE GWEN: EVEN BEFORE THE PRESIDENT'S ADMISSION THAT HE PRESIDENT'S ADMISSION THAT HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BUT DIDN'T, THAT HIS HEALTH CARE PLAN WAS SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BUT DIDN'T, THAT HIS HEALTH CARE PLAN WAS NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME, THAT HIS HEALTH CARE PLAN WAS NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME, DEMOCRATS WERE JOINING THE NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME, DEMOCRATS WERE JOINING THE CRITICISM.
DEMOCRATS WERE JOINING THE CRITICISM.
>> I PERSONAL LIP BELIEVE, EVEN CRITICISM.
>> I PERSONAL LIP BELIEVE, EVEN IF IT TAKES A CHANGE IN THE LAW, >> I PERSONAL LIP BELIEVE, EVEN IF IT TAKES A CHANGE IN THE LAW, THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HONOR THE IF IT TAKES A CHANGE IN THE LAW, THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HONOR THE COMMITMENT THE FEDERAL THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HONOR THE COMMITMENT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MADE TO THOSE PEOPLE.
COMMITMENT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MADE TO THOSE PEOPLE.
GWEN: HOW MUCH OF A HIT DID THE GOVERNMENT MADE TO THOSE PEOPLE.
GWEN: HOW MUCH OF A HIT DID THE WHITE HOUSE TAKE THIS WEEK AND GWEN: HOW MUCH OF A HIT DID THE WHITE HOUSE TAKE THIS WEEK AND IS IT TOO LATE TO SAL RAGE THE WHITE HOUSE TAKE THIS WEEK AND IS IT TOO LATE TO SAL RAGE THE HEALTH CARE PLAN OR THE IS IT TOO LATE TO SAL RAGE THE HEALTH CARE PLAN OR THE PRESIDENT'S CREDIBILITY?
HEALTH CARE PLAN OR THE PRESIDENT'S CREDIBILITY?
THAT COULD BE AN IMPORTANT PRESIDENT'S CREDIBILITY?
THAT COULD BE AN IMPORTANT QUESTION FOR THE U.S. AS IT THAT COULD BE AN IMPORTANT QUESTION FOR THE U.S. AS IT SEEKS TO NEGOTIATE A DEAL TO QUESTION FOR THE U.S. AS IT SEEKS TO NEGOTIATE A DEAL TO FREEZE IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM SEEKS TO NEGOTIATE A DEAL TO FREEZE IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM WITHOUT IMPOSING NEW SANCTIONS.
FREEZE IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM WITHOUT IMPOSING NEW SANCTIONS.
>> OUR HOPE IS NOW THAT NO NEW WITHOUT IMPOSING NEW SANCTIONS.
>> OUR HOPE IS NOW THAT NO NEW SANCTIONS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE >> OUR HOPE IS NOW THAT NO NEW SANCTIONS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE THAT COULD SET US BACK IN SANCTIONS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE THAT COULD SET US BACK IN ALOGDIUE THAT'S TAKEN 30 YEARS THAT COULD SET US BACK IN ALOGDIUE THAT'S TAKEN 30 YEARS TO BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE.
ALOGDIUE THAT'S TAKEN 30 YEARS TO BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE.
GWEN: WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE TO BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE.
GWEN: WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE DONE.
GWEN: WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE DONE.
COVERING THE WEEK, DAN BALZ OF DONE.
COVERING THE WEEK, DAN BALZ OF THE "WASHINGTON POST."
COVERING THE WEEK, DAN BALZ OF THE "WASHINGTON POST."
JOHN HARWOOD OF CNBC AND "THE THE "WASHINGTON POST."
JOHN HARWOOD OF CNBC AND "THE NEW YORK TIMES."
JOHN HARWOOD OF CNBC AND "THE NEW YORK TIMES."
INDIRA LAKSHMANAN OF "BLOOMBERG NEW YORK TIMES."
INDIRA LAKSHMANAN OF "BLOOMBERG NEWS" AND JEFF ZELENY OF ABC INDIRA LAKSHMANAN OF "BLOOMBERG NEWS" AND JEFF ZELENY OF ABC NEWS.
NEWS" AND JEFF ZELENY OF ABC NEWS.
>> REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, NEWS.
>> REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.
>> REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.
LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, COVERING HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.
LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON WEEK WITH LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON WEEK WITH GWEN IFILL."
ONCE AGAIN, LIVE FROM WASHINGTON, MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
WASHINGTON, MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
IFILL.
GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
THIS WEEK'S HEALTH CARE MELTDOWN GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
THIS WEEK'S HEALTH CARE MELTDOWN PROVIDED AN INTRIGUING LOOK INTO THIS WEEK'S HEALTH CARE MELTDOWN PROVIDED AN INTRIGUING LOOK INTO ALL THINGS WASHINGTON.
PROVIDED AN INTRIGUING LOOK INTO ALL THINGS WASHINGTON.
A SELF-CONFIDENT PRESIDENT ALL THINGS WASHINGTON.
A SELF-CONFIDENT PRESIDENT REDUCED TO RUEFUL APOLOGY AND AN A SELF-CONFIDENT PRESIDENT REDUCED TO RUEFUL APOLOGY AND AN UNPOPULAR CONGRESS WITH AN EYE REDUCED TO RUEFUL APOLOGY AND AN UNPOPULAR CONGRESS WITH AN EYE ON MIDTERM ELECTIONS AND THE UNPOPULAR CONGRESS WITH AN EYE ON MIDTERM ELECTIONS AND THE REALIZATION THAT BIG, SWEEPING ON MIDTERM ELECTIONS AND THE REALIZATION THAT BIG, SWEEPING CHANGE CAN COLLAPSE ON ITSELF.
REALIZATION THAT BIG, SWEEPING CHANGE CAN COLLAPSE ON ITSELF.
THE PRESIDENT SAID REPEATEDLY CHANGE CAN COLLAPSE ON ITSELF.
THE PRESIDENT SAID REPEATEDLY THAT HIS FOLKS FUMBLED THE BALL THE PRESIDENT SAID REPEATEDLY THAT HIS FOLKS FUMBLED THE BALL BY PROMISING EVERYONE COULD KEEP THAT HIS FOLKS FUMBLED THE BALL BY PROMISING EVERYONE COULD KEEP THE POLICY THEY LIKED.
BY PROMISING EVERYONE COULD KEEP THE POLICY THEY LIKED.
>> MY EXPECTATION WAS THAT FOR THE POLICY THEY LIKED.
>> MY EXPECTATION WAS THAT FOR 98% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE >> MY EXPECTATION WAS THAT FOR 98% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EITHER IT GENUINELY WOULDN'T 98% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EITHER IT GENUINELY WOULDN'T CHANGE AT ALL OR THEY'D BE EITHER IT GENUINELY WOULDN'T CHANGE AT ALL OR THEY'D BE SAOPTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE AN CHANGE AT ALL OR THEY'D BE SAOPTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE AN THAT THE GRANDFATHER CLAUSE SAOPTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE AN THAT THE GRANDFATHER CLAUSE WOULD COVER THE REST.
THAT THE GRANDFATHER CLAUSE WOULD COVER THE REST.
THAT PROVED NOT TO BE THE CASE.
WOULD COVER THE REST.
THAT PROVED NOT TO BE THE CASE.
AND THAT'S ON ME.
THAT PROVED NOT TO BE THE CASE.
AND THAT'S ON ME.
GWEN: BUT FOR THE STAUNCH AND THAT'S ON ME.
GWEN: BUT FOR THE STAUNCH OPPONENTS WHO EARLY ON BRANDED GWEN: BUT FOR THE STAUNCH OPPONENTS WHO EARLY ON BRANDED THE PLAN OBAMACARE, THE BOTCHED OPPONENTS WHO EARLY ON BRANDED THE PLAN OBAMACARE, THE BOTCHED ROLLOUT WAS ABOUT MORE.
THE PLAN OBAMACARE, THE BOTCHED ROLLOUT WAS ABOUT MORE.
>> FOR MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, ROLLOUT WAS ABOUT MORE.
>> FOR MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, IT'S CANCELLATION TODAY, STICKER >> FOR MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, IT'S CANCELLATION TODAY, STICKER SHOCK TOMORROW.
IT'S CANCELLATION TODAY, STICKER SHOCK TOMORROW.
FOR THE LAST SIX WEEKS, THE SHOCK TOMORROW.
FOR THE LAST SIX WEEKS, THE WHITE HOUSE STOOD ITLY BY, FOR THE LAST SIX WEEKS, THE WHITE HOUSE STOOD ITLY BY, IGNORING THE PLEAS OF MILLIONS WHITE HOUSE STOOD ITLY BY, IGNORING THE PLEAS OF MILLIONS BUT AS THE ADMINISTRATION'S IGNORING THE PLEAS OF MILLIONS BUT AS THE ADMINISTRATION'S ALLIES PANICKED, THE WHITE HOUSE BUT AS THE ADMINISTRATION'S ALLIES PANICKED, THE WHITE HOUSE ALLIES PANICKED, THE WHITE HOUSE WENT FROM ATTACKING OUR WENT FROM ATTACKING OUR THOUGHTFUL BILL TO MAKING AN END AROUND CONGRESS WITH A UNIVERSAL THOUGHTFUL BILL TO MAKING AN END AROUND CONGRESS WITH A UNIVERSAL FIX.
AROUND CONGRESS WITH A UNIVERSAL FIX.
GWEN: CONGRESSMEN ALLOWED POLICY FIX.
GWEN: CONGRESSMEN ALLOWED POLICY HOLDERS TO KEEP THE PLAN GWEN: CONGRESSMEN ALLOWED POLICY HOLDERS TO KEEP THE PLAN PERMANENTLY PASSED TODAY.
HOLDERS TO KEEP THE PLAN PERMANENTLY PASSED TODAY.
WHAT WAS MORE TELLING, THE ANGST PERMANENTLY PASSED TODAY.
WHAT WAS MORE TELLING, THE ANGST IT CAUSED DEMOCRATIC SUPPORTERS WHAT WAS MORE TELLING, THE ANGST IT CAUSED DEMOCRATIC SUPPORTERS OR WHAT IT REVEALED ABOUT BARACK IT CAUSED DEMOCRATIC SUPPORTERS OR WHAT IT REVEALED ABOUT BARACK OBAMA HIMSELF?
OR WHAT IT REVEALED ABOUT BARACK OBAMA HIMSELF?
>> I THINK CLEARLY WHAT WE SAW OBAMA HIMSELF?
>> I THINK CLEARLY WHAT WE SAW ABOUT THE PRESIDENT WAS THE MOST >> I THINK CLEARLY WHAT WE SAW ABOUT THE PRESIDENT WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING OF THE WEEK.
ABOUT THE PRESIDENT WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING OF THE WEEK.
WE'VE KNOWN THAT THE WEBSITE WAS IMPORTANT THING OF THE WEEK.
WE'VE KNOWN THAT THE WEBSITE WAS HAVING SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS.
WE'VE KNOWN THAT THE WEBSITE WAS HAVING SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS.
WE'VE KNOWN THAT THIS HAS HAVING SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS.
WE'VE KNOWN THAT THIS HAS PROVIDED AN OPENING FOR THE WE'VE KNOWN THAT THIS HAS PROVIDED AN OPENING FOR THE REPUBLICANS.
PROVIDED AN OPENING FOR THE REPUBLICANS.
WHAT WE SAW THIS WEEK WAS A REPUBLICANS.
WHAT WE SAW THIS WEEK WAS A PRESIDENT IS WAS AS CONTRITE AS WHAT WE SAW THIS WEEK WAS A PRESIDENT IS WAS AS CONTRITE AS WE'VE EVER SEEN HIM, CLEARLY ON PRESIDENT IS WAS AS CONTRITE AS WE'VE EVER SEEN HIM, CLEARLY ON HIS HEELS ON THIS AND I THINK WE'VE EVER SEEN HIM, CLEARLY ON HIS HEELS ON THIS AND I THINK RECOGNIZING HOW THE SITUATION HIS HEELS ON THIS AND I THINK RECOGNIZING HOW THE SITUATION HE'S ANYHOW IN IS DIFFERENT THAN RECOGNIZING HOW THE SITUATION HE'S ANYHOW IN IS DIFFERENT THAN ANYTHING HE'S REALLY FACED AS HE'S ANYHOW IN IS DIFFERENT THAN ANYTHING HE'S REALLY FACED AS PRESIDENT AND UNLESS THEY CAN ANYTHING HE'S REALLY FACED AS PRESIDENT AND UNLESS THEY CAN GET BOTH THE HEALTH CARE PLAN PRESIDENT AND UNLESS THEY CAN GET BOTH THE HEALTH CARE PLAN FIXED AND RESTORE SOME MEASURE GET BOTH THE HEALTH CARE PLAN FIXED AND RESTORE SOME MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY MORE GENERALLY TO FIXED AND RESTORE SOME MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY MORE GENERALLY TO HIS PRESIDENCY, HIS SECOND TERM OF CREDIBILITY MORE GENERALLY TO HIS PRESIDENCY, HIS SECOND TERM IS AT RISK.
HIS PRESIDENCY, HIS SECOND TERM IS AT RISK.
GWEN: JOHN, WHAT EXACTLY -- IS AT RISK.
GWEN: JOHN, WHAT EXACTLY -- YOU'RE SITTING AT HOME AND KIND GWEN: JOHN, WHAT EXACTLY -- YOU'RE SITTING AT HOME AND KIND OF PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS YOU YOU'RE SITTING AT HOME AND KIND OF PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS YOU KNOW THAT SOMETHING WENT WRONG OF PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS YOU KNOW THAT SOMETHING WENT WRONG WITH THE PLAN AND A LOT WENT KNOW THAT SOMETHING WENT WRONG WITH THE PLAN AND A LOT WENT WRONG WITH THE WEBSITE.
WITH THE PLAN AND A LOT WENT WRONG WITH THE WEBSITE.
BUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE PLAN WRONG WITH THE WEBSITE.
BUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE PLAN THAT THE PRESIDENT FELT HE HAD BUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE PLAN THAT THE PRESIDENT FELT HE HAD TO FIX?
THAT THE PRESIDENT FELT HE HAD TO FIX?
>> WELL, THE WAY THE HEALTH CARE TO FIX?
>> WELL, THE WAY THE HEALTH CARE LAW IS WORKING IS ACTUALLY -- IF >> WELL, THE WAY THE HEALTH CARE LAW IS WORKING IS ACTUALLY -- IF YOU SET THE WEBSITE ASIDE, IS LAW IS WORKING IS ACTUALLY -- IF YOU SET THE WEBSITE ASIDE, IS HOW IT WAS EXPECTED TO WORK, HOW YOU SET THE WEBSITE ASIDE, IS HOW IT WAS EXPECTED TO WORK, HOW THEY KNEW IT WAS GOING TO WORK.
HOW IT WAS EXPECTED TO WORK, HOW THEY KNEW IT WAS GOING TO WORK.
THEY ANTICIPATED -- BECAUSE THE THEY KNEW IT WAS GOING TO WORK.
THEY ANTICIPATED -- BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT AND THE LAW -- ON THEY ANTICIPATED -- BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT AND THE LAW -- ON PURPOSE -- TURNED OTHER THE PRESIDENT AND THE LAW -- ON PURPOSE -- TURNED OTHER THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET.
PURPOSE -- TURNED OTHER THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET.
NOW, WE'RE IN A SITUATION WHERE INDIVIDUAL MARKET.
NOW, WE'RE IN A SITUATION WHERE ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO THINK NOW, WE'RE IN A SITUATION WHERE ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO THINK THEY'RE HURT BY THAT KNOW IT AND ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO THINK THEY'RE HURT BY THAT KNOW IT AND ARE COMPLAINING VERY LOUDLY AND THEY'RE HURT BY THAT KNOW IT AND ARE COMPLAINING VERY LOUDLY AND BECAUSE THE WEBSITE IS NOT ARE COMPLAINING VERY LOUDLY AND BECAUSE THE WEBSITE IS NOT WORKING, ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO BECAUSE THE WEBSITE IS NOT WORKING, ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE HELPED BY THAT CAN'T WORKING, ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE HELPED BY THAT CAN'T FIND IT OUT AND SO YOU HAVE A MIGHT BE HELPED BY THAT CAN'T FIND IT OUT AND SO YOU HAVE A HUGE IMBALANCE.
FIND IT OUT AND SO YOU HAVE A HUGE IMBALANCE.
WE HAVE A POLITICAL SYSTEM WHERE HUGE IMBALANCE.
WE HAVE A POLITICAL SYSTEM WHERE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE MOST NOISE WE HAVE A POLITICAL SYSTEM WHERE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE MOST NOISE GET THE MOST RESPONSE SO THAT PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE MOST NOISE GET THE MOST RESPONSE SO THAT WAS PUTTING TREMENDOUS PRESSURE GET THE MOST RESPONSE SO THAT WAS PUTTING TREMENDOUS PRESSURE ON THE WHITE HOUSE, ON DEMOCRATS WAS PUTTING TREMENDOUS PRESSURE ON THE WHITE HOUSE, ON DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS.
ON THE WHITE HOUSE, ON DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS.
REPUBLICANS TOOK ADVANTAGE AND IN CONGRESS.
REPUBLICANS TOOK ADVANTAGE AND WHAT THE WITH THE -- PRESIDENT REPUBLICANS TOOK ADVANTAGE AND WHAT THE WITH THE -- PRESIDENT WAS ENGAGED IN WAS AN EXERCISE WHAT THE WITH THE -- PRESIDENT WAS ENGAGED IN WAS AN EXERCISE OF TRYING TO PUT UP A HEAT WAS ENGAGED IN WAS AN EXERCISE OF TRYING TO PUT UP A HEAT SHIELD FOR HIMSELF AND FOR OF TRYING TO PUT UP A HEAT SHIELD FOR HIMSELF AND FOR DEMOCRATS WITH THIS FIX.
SHIELD FOR HIMSELF AND FOR DEMOCRATS WITH THIS FIX.
IN TERMS OF WHAT IT MEANS FOR DEMOCRATS WITH THIS FIX.
IN TERMS OF WHAT IT MEANS FOR INSURANCE POLICIES, PROBABLY NOT IN TERMS OF WHAT IT MEANS FOR INSURANCE POLICIES, PROBABLY NOT ALL THAT MUCH BECAUSE THE INSURANCE POLICIES, PROBABLY NOT ALL THAT MUCH BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT DIDN'T COMPEL ANYONE ALL THAT MUCH BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT DIDN'T COMPEL ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING.
PRESIDENT DIDN'T COMPEL ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING.
WHAT HE DID WAS SAY TO STATE TO DO ANYTHING.
WHAT HE DID WAS SAY TO STATE INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS, IF WHAT HE DID WAS SAY TO STATE INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU'RE WILLING TO DO THIS AND IF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU'RE WILLING TO DO THIS AND IF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE ALSO YOU'RE WILLING TO DO THIS AND IF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE ALSO WILLING TO DO IT, THEN THOSE THE INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE ALSO WILLING TO DO IT, THEN THOSE INSURANCE POLICIES CAN BE WILLING TO DO IT, THEN THOSE INSURANCE POLICIES CAN BE EXTENDED AS LATE AS SEPTEMBER 20 INSURANCE POLICIES CAN BE EXTENDED AS LATE AS SEPTEMBER 20 15.
EXTENDED AS LATE AS SEPTEMBER 20 15.
BUT MANY STATES AND MANY 15.
BUT MANY STATES AND MANY INSURANCE COMPANIES DON'T WANT BUT MANY STATES AND MANY INSURANCE COMPANIES DON'T WANT TO DO THAT AND THE WHITE HOUSE INSURANCE COMPANIES DON'T WANT TO DO THAT AND THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO STOP TO DO THAT AND THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO STOP THE STEAMROLLER OF THE BILL THAT KNEW THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO STOP THE STEAMROLLER OF THE BILL THAT FRED UPTON WAS TALKING ABOUT IN THE STEAMROLLER OF THE BILL THAT FRED UPTON WAS TALKING ABOUT IN THE CLIP YOU JUST PLAYED AND FRED UPTON WAS TALKING ABOUT IN THE CLIP YOU JUST PLAYED AND GIVE DEMOCRATS SOMETHING TO HANG THE CLIP YOU JUST PLAYED AND GIVE DEMOCRATS SOMETHING TO HANG ONTO TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO STAND GIVE DEMOCRATS SOMETHING TO HANG ONTO TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO STAND WITH THE PRESIDENT.
ONTO TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO STAND WITH THE PRESIDENT.
HE'S DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE AND WITH THE PRESIDENT.
HE'S DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE AND WE'LL SEE HOW SUCCESSFUL THAT HE'S DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE AND WE'LL SEE HOW SUCCESSFUL THAT HAS.
WE'LL SEE HOW SUCCESSFUL THAT HAS.
GWEN: THE UPTON BILL PROBABLY HAS.
GWEN: THE UPTON BILL PROBABLY WOULDN'T PASS THE SENATE AND IF GWEN: THE UPTON BILL PROBABLY WOULDN'T PASS THE SENATE AND IF IT DID THE PRESIDENT WOULD VETO WOULDN'T PASS THE SENATE AND IF IT DID THE PRESIDENT WOULD VETO IT.
IT DID THE PRESIDENT WOULD VETO IT.
>> NOT PROBABLY, IT DEFINITELY IT.
>> NOT PROBABLY, IT DEFINITELY WOULDN'T.
>> NOT PROBABLY, IT DEFINITELY WOULDN'T.
GWEN: IT GAVE THE REPUBLICANS WOULDN'T.
GWEN: IT GAVE THE REPUBLICANS MORE AMMUNITION.
GWEN: IT GAVE THE REPUBLICANS MORE AMMUNITION.
JOHN BOEHNER CAME OUT AND TALKED MORE AMMUNITION.
JOHN BOEHNER CAME OUT AND TALKED IN ADVANCE OF THE PRESIDENT JOHN BOEHNER CAME OUT AND TALKED IN ADVANCE OF THE PRESIDENT ABOUT EVERYTHING THAT WAS WRONG IN ADVANCE OF THE PRESIDENT ABOUT EVERYTHING THAT WAS WRONG WITH THIS.
ABOUT EVERYTHING THAT WAS WRONG WITH THIS.
>> WHEN IT COMES TO OBAMACARE, WITH THIS.
>> WHEN IT COMES TO OBAMACARE, IT'S CLEAR THAT THE AMERICAN >> WHEN IT COMES TO OBAMACARE, IT'S CLEAR THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SIMPLY CAN'T TRUST THIS IT'S CLEAR THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SIMPLY CAN'T TRUST THIS WHITE HOUSE.
PEOPLE SIMPLY CAN'T TRUST THIS WHITE HOUSE.
THE WHITE HOUSE SAID AMERICANS WHITE HOUSE.
THE WHITE HOUSE SAID AMERICANS COULD TRUST THEM WHEN THEY THE WHITE HOUSE SAID AMERICANS COULD TRUST THEM WHEN THEY SUBMITTED THEIR PERSONAL COULD TRUST THEM WHEN THEY SUBMITTED THEIR PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT THE WEBSITE WAS SUBMITTED THEIR PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT THE WEBSITE WAS TESTED AND WAS SECURE.
INFORMATION THAT THE WEBSITE WAS TESTED AND WAS SECURE.
WELL, THAT HASN'T HAPPENED.
TESTED AND WAS SECURE.
WELL, THAT HASN'T HAPPENED.
GWEN: JOHN BOEHNER A COUPLE OF WELL, THAT HASN'T HAPPENED.
GWEN: JOHN BOEHNER A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO WAS AT THE BOTTOM OF GWEN: JOHN BOEHNER A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO WAS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PILE AFTER THE GOVERNMENT WEEKS AGO WAS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PILE AFTER THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.
THE PILE AFTER THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.
NOW THE REPUBLICANS SEE A LITTLE SHUTDOWN.
NOW THE REPUBLICANS SEE A LITTLE DAYLIGHT.
NOW THE REPUBLICANS SEE A LITTLE DAYLIGHT.
>> A LOT OF DAYLIGHT AND ONE DAYLIGHT.
>> A LOT OF DAYLIGHT AND ONE MONTH TOMORROW IS WHEN THE >> A LOT OF DAYLIGHT AND ONE MONTH TOMORROW IS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENDED.
MONTH TOMORROW IS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENDED.
GIRLFRIEND.
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENDED.
GIRLFRIEND.
IS THAT ALL?
GIRLFRIEND.
IS THAT ALL?
>> THINGS REALLY HANG IN A IS THAT ALL?
>> THINGS REALLY HANG IN A HURRY.
>> THINGS REALLY HANG IN A HURRY.
THE WHITE HOUSE IS HOPING THIS HURRY.
THE WHITE HOUSE IS HOPING THIS WILL CHANGE IN A HURRY BUT THE WHITE HOUSE IS HOPING THIS WILL CHANGE IN A HURRY BUT PROBABLY NOT SO FAST.
WILL CHANGE IN A HURRY BUT PROBABLY NOT SO FAST.
I HAD HEARD SPEAKER BOEHNER SAY PROBABLY NOT SO FAST.
I HAD HEARD SPEAKER BOEHNER SAY SIMILAR THINGS THROUGHOUT THE I HAD HEARD SPEAKER BOEHNER SAY SIMILAR THINGS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR BUT THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT.
SIMILAR THINGS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR BUT THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT.
THE PRESIDENT, A FAILED WEBSITE YEAR BUT THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT.
THE PRESIDENT, A FAILED WEBSITE HAVE GINN REPUBLICANS A HUGE THE PRESIDENT, A FAILED WEBSITE HAVE GINN REPUBLICANS A HUGE OPENING AND TODAY 39 DEMOCRATS HAVE GINN REPUBLICANS A HUGE OPENING AND TODAY 39 DEMOCRATS VOTED WITH THE REPUBLICANS ON OPENING AND TODAY 39 DEMOCRATS VOTED WITH THE REPUBLICANS ON THE UPTON BILL TO BASICALLY DEFY VOTED WITH THE REPUBLICANS ON THE UPTON BILL TO BASICALLY DEFY THE PRESIDENT AND THEIR HOUSE THE UPTON BILL TO BASICALLY DEFY THE PRESIDENT AND THEIR HOUSE LEADERSHIP AND THEY WANT TO CAST THE PRESIDENT AND THEIR HOUSE LEADERSHIP AND THEY WANT TO CAST A VOTE.
LEADERSHIP AND THEY WANT TO CAST A VOTE.
EVEN AS THE PRESIDENT WAS A VOTE.
EVEN AS THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING YESTERDAY FOR A PRETTY EVEN AS THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING YESTERDAY FOR A PRETTY LONG TIME ANSWERING A LOT OF SPEAKING YESTERDAY FOR A PRETTY LONG TIME ANSWERING A LOT OF QUESTIONS ON PURPOSE TO TRY AND LONG TIME ANSWERING A LOT OF QUESTIONS ON PURPOSE TO TRY AND SHOW PEOPLE THAT HE IS SORRY AND QUESTIONS ON PURPOSE TO TRY AND SHOW PEOPLE THAT HE IS SORRY AND GET THE TRUST BACK .
SHOW PEOPLE THAT HE IS SORRY AND GET THE TRUST BACK .
SENATE DEMOCRATS WERE LIKE WE GET THE TRUST BACK .
SENATE DEMOCRATS WERE LIKE WE ACTUALLY WANT A VOTE ON THIS.
SENATE DEMOCRATS WERE LIKE WE ACTUALLY WANT A VOTE ON THIS.
WE WANT PART OF OUR VOTING ACTUALLY WANT A VOTE ON THIS.
WE WANT PART OF OUR VOTING RECORD TO INCLUDE SOME KIND OF A WE WANT PART OF OUR VOTING RECORD TO INCLUDE SOME KIND OF A FIX FOR OBAMACARE BECAUSE RECORD TO INCLUDE SOME KIND OF A FIX FOR OBAMACARE BECAUSE THEY'RE RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION FIX FOR OBAMACARE BECAUSE THEY'RE RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION NEXT YEAR.
THEY'RE RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION NEXT YEAR.
GWEN: AND THE LEADER OF THAT NEXT YEAR.
GWEN: AND THE LEADER OF THAT MOVEMENT WAS SENATOR MARY GWEN: AND THE LEADER OF THAT MOVEMENT WAS SENATOR MARY LANDRIEU.
MOVEMENT WAS SENATOR MARY LANDRIEU.
LET'S LISTEN TO HER.
LANDRIEU.
LET'S LISTEN TO HER.
>> WE'RE GOING TO BE WORKING LET'S LISTEN TO HER.
>> WE'RE GOING TO BE WORKING ACROSS THE AISLE NOT TO REPEAL >> WE'RE GOING TO BE WORKING ACROSS THE AISLE NOT TO REPEAL OR DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACROSS THE AISLE NOT TO REPEAL OR DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, NOT TO UNDERMINE THE OR DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, NOT TO UNDERMINE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, NOT TO GUT ACT, NOT TO UNDERMINE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, NOT TO GUT IT BUT TO FIX IT.
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, NOT TO GUT IT BUT TO FIX IT.
GWEN: BUT ISN'T FIXING IT IT BUT TO FIX IT.
GWEN: BUT ISN'T FIXING IT UNDERMINING IT?
GWEN: BUT ISN'T FIXING IT UNDERMINING IT?
>> RIGHT BEFORE SHE SAID THAT UNDERMINING IT?
>> RIGHT BEFORE SHE SAID THAT SHE SAID WHAT THE PRESIDENT DID >> RIGHT BEFORE SHE SAID THAT SHE SAID WHAT THE PRESIDENT DID TODAY WAS A GOOD FIRST STEP.
SHE SAID WHAT THE PRESIDENT DID TODAY WAS A GOOD FIRST STEP.
SHE IS ONE OF THOSE DEMOCRATS ON TODAY WAS A GOOD FIRST STEP.
SHE IS ONE OF THOSE DEMOCRATS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A TOUGH SHE IS ONE OF THOSE DEMOCRATS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A TOUGH RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN THE FRONT LINE OF A TOUGH RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN LOUISIANA.
RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN LOUISIANA.
I WAS STANDING NEXT TO HER WHEN LOUISIANA.
I WAS STANDING NEXT TO HER WHEN SHE WAS SAYING THAT AND SHE MADE I WAS STANDING NEXT TO HER WHEN SHE WAS SAYING THAT AND SHE MADE CLEAR THAT SHE IS GOING TO GO SHE WAS SAYING THAT AND SHE MADE CLEAR THAT SHE IS GOING TO GO AHEAD WITH THIS.
CLEAR THAT SHE IS GOING TO GO AHEAD WITH THIS.
SOME OF IT IS WINDOW DRESSING AHEAD WITH THIS.
SOME OF IT IS WINDOW DRESSING FOR HER CONSTITUENTS AT HOME.
SOME OF IT IS WINDOW DRESSING FOR HER CONSTITUENTS AT HOME.
BUT THE WHITE HOUSE IS WORRIED FOR HER CONSTITUENTS AT HOME.
BUT THE WHITE HOUSE IS WORRIED ABOUT HER BILL.
BUT THE WHITE HOUSE IS WORRIED ABOUT HER BILL.
HER BILL WOULD ALLOW AMERICANS ABOUT HER BILL.
HER BILL WOULD ALLOW AMERICANS TO KEEP THEIR POLICIES HER BILL WOULD ALLOW AMERICANS TO KEEP THEIR POLICIES INDEFINITELY.
TO KEEP THEIR POLICIES INDEFINITELY.
THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE BALANCE INDEFINITELY.
THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE BALANCE OF ALL THIS NOT ALL THAT MANY THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE BALANCE OF ALL THIS NOT ALL THAT MANY DEMOCRATS ARE SIGNING ON WITH OF ALL THIS NOT ALL THAT MANY DEMOCRATS ARE SIGNING ON WITH HER.
DEMOCRATS ARE SIGNING ON WITH HER.
I THINK SEVEN HAVE NOW.
HER.
I THINK SEVEN HAVE NOW.
BUT EVEN THE OTHERS, LIKE THE I THINK SEVEN HAVE NOW.
BUT EVEN THE OTHERS, LIKE THE SENATOR FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS A BUT EVEN THE OTHERS, LIKE THE SENATOR FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS A BILL.
SENATOR FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS A BILL.
TOM UDALL HAS A BILL.
BILL.
TOM UDALL HAS A BILL.
SO MANY DIFFERENT BILLS OUT TOM UDALL HAS A BILL.
SO MANY DIFFERENT BILLS OUT THERE.
SO MANY DIFFERENT BILLS OUT THERE.
BUT PEOPLE WANT TO VOTE ON THERE.
BUT PEOPLE WANT TO VOTE ON SOMETHING.
BUT PEOPLE WANT TO VOTE ON SOMETHING.
>> I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE SOMETHING.
>> I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S PROPOSED FIX.
>> I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S PROPOSED FIX.
IF THE IDEA IS TO ALLOW PEOPLE PRESIDENT'S PROPOSED FIX.
IF THE IDEA IS TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO KEEP THEIR OLD PLANS THAT WAS IF THE IDEA IS TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO KEEP THEIR OLD PLANS THAT WAS -- THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE TO KEEP THEIR OLD PLANS THAT WAS -- THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE PHASED OUT FOR A YEAR, ISN'T -- THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE PHASED OUT FOR A YEAR, ISN'T THAT KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE PHASED OUT FOR A YEAR, ISN'T THAT KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD AND WE'LL HAVE THE SAME THAT KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD AND WE'LL HAVE THE SAME DECISION TO MAKE RIGHT BEFORE ROAD AND WE'LL HAVE THE SAME DECISION TO MAKE RIGHT BEFORE THE 2014 ELECTION.
DECISION TO MAKE RIGHT BEFORE THE 2014 ELECTION.
IS THAT ANY DIFFERENT FOR THE 2014 ELECTION.
IS THAT ANY DIFFERENT FOR DEMOCRATS AT THAT POINT?
IS THAT ANY DIFFERENT FOR DEMOCRATS AT THAT POINT?
>> JOHN WAS RIGHT.
DEMOCRATS AT THAT POINT?
>> JOHN WAS RIGHT.
THE PRESIDENT WASN'T COMPELLING >> JOHN WAS RIGHT.
THE PRESIDENT WASN'T COMPELLING ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING.
THE PRESIDENT WASN'T COMPELLING ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING.
IT WAS VERY MUCH A MESSAGE ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING.
IT WAS VERY MUCH A MESSAGE YESTERDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
IT WAS VERY MUCH A MESSAGE YESTERDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
HE'S FALLEN ON HIS SWORD.
YESTERDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
HE'S FALLEN ON HIS SWORD.
WE'VE USE THAN METAPHOR SO MANY HE'S FALLEN ON HIS SWORD.
WE'VE USE THAN METAPHOR SO MANY TIMES.
WE'VE USE THAN METAPHOR SO MANY TIMES.
YOU'RE RIGHT, IT IS KICKING THE TIMES.
YOU'RE RIGHT, IT IS KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD, NOT SOLVING YOU'RE RIGHT, IT IS KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD, NOT SOLVING ANYTHING BUT GIVES PEOPLE MORE CAN DOWN THE ROAD, NOT SOLVING ANYTHING BUT GIVES PEOPLE MORE TIME TO DEAL WITH THIS.
ANYTHING BUT GIVES PEOPLE MORE TIME TO DEAL WITH THIS.
>> THIS IS ONE PLACE WHERE TIME TO DEAL WITH THIS.
>> THIS IS ONE PLACE WHERE GRIDLOCK IS THE PRESIDENT'S >> THIS IS ONE PLACE WHERE GRIDLOCK IS THE PRESIDENT'S FRIEND BECAUSE GETTING THE GRIDLOCK IS THE PRESIDENT'S FRIEND BECAUSE GETTING THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE AND THE FRIEND BECAUSE GETTING THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE AND THE DEMOCRATIC SENATE TO AGREE ON A REPUBLICAN HOUSE AND THE DEMOCRATIC SENATE TO AGREE ON A BILL, CHANGING THIS LAW IS GOING DEMOCRATIC SENATE TO AGREE ON A BILL, CHANGING THIS LAW IS GOING TO BE IMPOSSIBLE.
BILL, CHANGING THIS LAW IS GOING TO BE IMPOSSIBLE.
THEY SIMPLY -- REPUBLICANS WANT TO BE IMPOSSIBLE.
THEY SIMPLY -- REPUBLICANS WANT TO KILL IT AND DEMOCRATS WANT TO THEY SIMPLY -- REPUBLICANS WANT TO KILL IT AND DEMOCRATS WANT TO FIX IT LIKE MARY LANDRIEU SAID.
TO KILL IT AND DEMOCRATS WANT TO FIX IT LIKE MARY LANDRIEU SAID.
THE OTHER THING IS, ON YOUR FIX IT LIKE MARY LANDRIEU SAID.
THE OTHER THING IS, ON YOUR QUESTION, THE ANSWER IS YES.
THE OTHER THING IS, ON YOUR QUESTION, THE ANSWER IS YES.
A FIX WOULD, IN FACT, UNDERMINE QUESTION, THE ANSWER IS YES.
A FIX WOULD, IN FACT, UNDERMINE THE LAW AND THAT'S BECAUSE FOR A FIX WOULD, IN FACT, UNDERMINE THE LAW AND THAT'S BECAUSE FOR THE LAW TO WORK, YOU HAVE TO THE LAW AND THAT'S BECAUSE FOR THE LAW TO WORK, YOU HAVE TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD THESE THE LAW TO WORK, YOU HAVE TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD THESE CANCELED PLANS, MANY OF WHOM ARE HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD THESE CANCELED PLANS, MANY OF WHOM ARE HEALTHY PEOPLE WHO BENEFITED CANCELED PLANS, MANY OF WHOM ARE HEALTHY PEOPLE WHO BENEFITED FROM THE FACTS THAT THEY DON'T HEALTHY PEOPLE WHO BENEFITED FROM THE FACTS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE MANY MEDICAL NEEDS SO THEY FROM THE FACTS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE MANY MEDICAL NEEDS SO THEY CAN PAY A SMALL AMOUNT FOR A HAVE MANY MEDICAL NEEDS SO THEY CAN PAY A SMALL AMOUNT FOR A THIN POLICY.
CAN PAY A SMALL AMOUNT FOR A THIN POLICY.
THOSE WHO GET SICK A LOT OF THIN POLICY.
THOSE WHO GET SICK A LOT OF TIMES WOULD HAVE THEIR INSURANCE THOSE WHO GET SICK A LOT OF TIMES WOULD HAVE THEIR INSURANCE CANCELED OR FACE CAPS ON THE TIMES WOULD HAVE THEIR INSURANCE CANCELED OR FACE CAPS ON THE BENEFITS.
CANCELED OR FACE CAPS ON THE BENEFITS.
BUT THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO BE IN BENEFITS.
BUT THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO BE IN THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THEIR PREMIUM BUT THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO BE IN THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THEIR PREMIUM MONEY IS NECESSARY TO PAY FOR THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THEIR PREMIUM MONEY IS NECESSARY TO PAY FOR THE OLDER, SICKER PEOPLE WHO CAN MONEY IS NECESSARY TO PAY FOR THE OLDER, SICKER PEOPLE WHO CAN NOW BUY INSURANCE WHO COULDN'T THE OLDER, SICKER PEOPLE WHO CAN NOW BUY INSURANCE WHO COULDN'T BUY IT BEFORE.
MISALIGN AND MES NOW BUY INSURANCE WHO COULDN'T BUY IT BEFORE.
MISALIGN AND MES THAT RISK POOL BY TAKING YOUNGER BUY IT BEFORE.
MISALIGN AND MES THAT RISK POOL BY TAKING YOUNGER HEALTHY PEOPLE OUT OF IT, YOU THAT RISK POOL BY TAKING YOUNGER HEALTHY PEOPLE OUT OF IT, YOU UNDERMINE THE LAW.
HEALTHY PEOPLE OUT OF IT, YOU UNDERMINE THE LAW.
GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS UNDERMINE THE LAW.
GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS FASCINATING ABOUT THAT NEWS GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS FASCINATING ABOUT THAT NEWS CONFERENCE YESTERDAY WAS KIND OF FASCINATING ABOUT THAT NEWS CONFERENCE YESTERDAY WAS KIND OF AN INSIGHT TO NOT ONLY THE WAY CONFERENCE YESTERDAY WAS KIND OF AN INSIGHT TO NOT ONLY THE WAY THE PRESIDENT'S MIND WORKS BUT AN INSIGHT TO NOT ONLY THE WAY THE PRESIDENT'S MIND WORKS BUT ALSO THE WAY THE WHITE HOUSE THE PRESIDENT'S MIND WORKS BUT ALSO THE WAY THE WHITE HOUSE WORKS IN WHICH HE ADMITTED ON ALSO THE WAY THE WHITE HOUSE WORKS IN WHICH HE ADMITTED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS HE JUST DIDN'T WORKS IN WHICH HE ADMITTED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS HE JUST DIDN'T KNOW.
SEVERAL OCCASIONS HE JUST DIDN'T KNOW.
LET'S LISTEN TO THAT.
KNOW.
LET'S LISTEN TO THAT.
>> WE DIDN'T GO FAR LEFT AND LET'S LISTEN TO THAT.
>> WE DIDN'T GO FAR LEFT AND CHOOSE AN APPROACH THAT WOULD >> WE DIDN'T GO FAR LEFT AND CHOOSE AN APPROACH THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DISRUPTIVE.
CHOOSE AN APPROACH THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DISRUPTIVE.
WE DIDN'T ADOPT SOME MORE HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DISRUPTIVE.
WE DIDN'T ADOPT SOME MORE CONSERVATIVE PROPOSALS THAT WE DIDN'T ADOPT SOME MORE CONSERVATIVE PROPOSALS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE CONSERVATIVE PROPOSALS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DISRUPTIVE.
WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DISRUPTIVE.
WE TRIED TO CHOOSE A WAY THAT DISRUPTIVE.
WE TRIED TO CHOOSE A WAY THAT BUILT OFF THE EXISTING SYSTEM, WE TRIED TO CHOOSE A WAY THAT BUILT OFF THE EXISTING SYSTEM, BUT IT IS COMPLICATED.
BUILT OFF THE EXISTING SYSTEM, BUT IT IS COMPLICATED.
IT IS HARD BUT I MAKE NO A BUT IT IS COMPLICATED.
IT IS HARD BUT I MAKE NO A APOLOGIZES FOR US TAKING THIS -- IT IS HARD BUT I MAKE NO A APOLOGIZES FOR US TAKING THIS -- APOLOGIES FOR US SOONER OR LATER APOLOGIZES FOR US TAKING THIS -- APOLOGIES FOR US SOONER OR LATER HAD TO DO IT.
APOLOGIES FOR US SOONER OR LATER HAD TO DO IT.
GWEN: I CALL THAT THE GOLDILOCKS HAD TO DO IT.
GWEN: I CALL THAT THE GOLDILOCKS DEFENSE.
GWEN: I CALL THAT THE GOLDILOCKS DEFENSE.
>> RIGHT NOW THE PORRIDGE DEFENSE.
>> RIGHT NOW THE PORRIDGE DOESN'T TASTE GOOD TO A LOT OF >> RIGHT NOW THE PORRIDGE DOESN'T TASTE GOOD TO A LOT OF PEOPLE.
DOESN'T TASTE GOOD TO A LOT OF PEOPLE.
I THINK WHAT WAS MOST TELLING PEOPLE.
I THINK WHAT WAS MOST TELLING ABOUT THAT PRESS CONFERENCE WAS I THINK WHAT WAS MOST TELLING ABOUT THAT PRESS CONFERENCE WAS NOT SIMPLY THAT HE SAID HE WAS ABOUT THAT PRESS CONFERENCE WAS NOT SIMPLY THAT HE SAID HE WAS SORRY, THAT WE FUMBLED, IT WAS NOT SIMPLY THAT HE SAID HE WAS SORRY, THAT WE FUMBLED, IT WAS ON HIS SHOULDER, ON ME, ETC., SORRY, THAT WE FUMBLED, IT WAS ON HIS SHOULDER, ON ME, ETC., BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS.
ON HIS SHOULDER, ON ME, ETC., BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS.
ONE WAS THE DEGREE TO WHICH HE BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS.
ONE WAS THE DEGREE TO WHICH HE DID NOT KNOW THE PROBLEMS AS ONE WAS THE DEGREE TO WHICH HE DID NOT KNOW THE PROBLEMS AS THEY WERE ABOUT TO LAUNCH.
DID NOT KNOW THE PROBLEMS AS THEY WERE ABOUT TO LAUNCH.
BUT THE SECOND THAT I THOUGHT THEY WERE ABOUT TO LAUNCH.
BUT THE SECOND THAT I THOUGHT WAS MORE REVEALING AND MORE BUT THE SECOND THAT I THOUGHT WAS MORE REVEALING AND MORE DAMAGING WAS WHEN HE SAID WHAT WAS MORE REVEALING AND MORE DAMAGING WAS WHEN HE SAID WHAT WE'VE LEARNED IS THAT BUYING DAMAGING WAS WHEN HE SAID WHAT WE'VE LEARNED IS THAT BUYING INSURANCE IS VERY COMPLICATED.
WE'VE LEARNED IS THAT BUYING INSURANCE IS VERY COMPLICATED.
WHICH WAS, IN ESSENCE, A GENTLE INSURANCE IS VERY COMPLICATED.
WHICH WAS, IN ESSENCE, A GENTLE WAY OF SAYING WE BIT OFF A LOT WHICH WAS, IN ESSENCE, A GENTLE WAY OF SAYING WE BIT OFF A LOT MORE THAN WE WERE ABLE TO DO AND WAY OF SAYING WE BIT OFF A LOT MORE THAN WE WERE ABLE TO DO AND WE DID NOT REALIZE AT THE TIME MORE THAN WE WERE ABLE TO DO AND WE DID NOT REALIZE AT THE TIME HOW DIFFICULT THIS WAS GOING TO WE DID NOT REALIZE AT THE TIME HOW DIFFICULT THIS WAS GOING TO BE.
HOW DIFFICULT THIS WAS GOING TO BE.
ALMOST ANY WAY YOU PARSE THAT BE.
ALMOST ANY WAY YOU PARSE THAT IT'S NOT GOOD FOR THE PRESIDENT ALMOST ANY WAY YOU PARSE THAT IT'S NOT GOOD FOR THE PRESIDENT AND THE WHITE HOUSE.
IT'S NOT GOOD FOR THE PRESIDENT AND THE WHITE HOUSE.
GWEN: BACK TO 1993, ALL OF US AND THE WHITE HOUSE.
GWEN: BACK TO 1993, ALL OF US WHO WERE THERE COVERING THE LAST GWEN: BACK TO 1993, ALL OF US WHO WERE THERE COVERING THE LAST TIME THEY TRIED TO DO BIG HEALTH WHO WERE THERE COVERING THE LAST TIME THEY TRIED TO DO BIG HEALTH CARE WITH HILLARY CLINTON'S TIME THEY TRIED TO DO BIG HEALTH CARE WITH HILLARY CLINTON'S HEALTH CARE TASK FORCE.
CARE WITH HILLARY CLINTON'S HEALTH CARE TASK FORCE.
THEY ALSO BIT OFF MORE THAN THEY HEALTH CARE TASK FORCE.
THEY ALSO BIT OFF MORE THAN THEY AULD CHEW AND COLLAPSED AS THEY ALSO BIT OFF MORE THAN THEY AULD CHEW AND COLLAPSED AS RESULT OF THAT.
AULD CHEW AND COLLAPSED AS RESULT OF THAT.
HE WAS SAYING WE TRIED NOT TO DO RESULT OF THAT.
HE WAS SAYING WE TRIED NOT TO DO THAT AND STILL GOT TRIPLED UP.
HE WAS SAYING WE TRIED NOT TO DO THAT AND STILL GOT TRIPLED UP.
>> BUT THE SAME THING IS THAT AND STILL GOT TRIPLED UP.
>> BUT THE SAME THING IS TRIPPING UP THIS PRESIDENT THAT >> BUT THE SAME THING IS TRIPPING UP THIS PRESIDENT THAT TRIMMED UP BILL CLINTONNLE TRIPPING UP THIS PRESIDENT THAT TRIMMED UP BILL CLINTONNLE EARLIER IN THE PROCESS.
TRIMMED UP BILL CLINTONNLE EARLIER IN THE PROCESS.
THE REASON IT FAILED UNDER EARLIER IN THE PROCESS.
THE REASON IT FAILED UNDER CLINTON'S ADMINISTRATION IS THAT THE REASON IT FAILED UNDER CLINTON'S ADMINISTRATION IS THAT ULTIMATELY THE AMERICANS BECAME CLINTON'S ADMINISTRATION IS THAT ULTIMATELY THE AMERICANS BECAME CONVINCED THAT IT WAS GOING TO ULTIMATELY THE AMERICANS BECAME CONVINCED THAT IT WAS GOING TO COST THEM MONEY TO PROVIDE CONVINCED THAT IT WAS GOING TO COST THEM MONEY TO PROVIDE INSURANCE TO OTHER PEOPLE.
COST THEM MONEY TO PROVIDE INSURANCE TO OTHER PEOPLE.
THE PEOPLE COMPLAINING ARE NOW INSURANCE TO OTHER PEOPLE.
THE PEOPLE COMPLAINING ARE NOW MAKING THAT SAME COMPLAINT.
THE PEOPLE COMPLAINING ARE NOW MAKING THAT SAME COMPLAINT.
YOU'RE MESSING WITH MY SITUATION MAKING THAT SAME COMPLAINT.
YOU'RE MESSING WITH MY SITUATION IN ORDER TO HELP SOMEBODY ELSE.
YOU'RE MESSING WITH MY SITUATION IN ORDER TO HELP SOMEBODY ELSE.
OSE COMPLAINTS ARE HAPPENING IN ORDER TO HELP SOMEBODY ELSE.
OSE COMPLAINTS ARE HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME THE TECHOLOGYAL OSE COMPLAINTS ARE HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME THE TECHOLOGYAL FAILURE IS PREVENTING PEOPLE?
AT THE SAME TIME THE TECHOLOGYAL FAILURE IS PREVENTING PEOPLE?
FINDING OUT WHETHER THEY COME FAILURE IS PREVENTING PEOPLE?
FINDING OUT WHETHER THEY COME OUT AHEAD.
FINDING OUT WHETHER THEY COME OUT AHEAD.
>> I WAS SURPRISED BY BILL OUT AHEAD.
>> I WAS SURPRISED BY BILL CLINTON INSERTING HIMSELF IN THE >> I WAS SURPRISED BY BILL CLINTON INSERTING HIMSELF IN THE PROCESS.
CLINTON INSERTING HIMSELF IN THE PROCESS.
OBVIOUSLY HE AND HIS WIFE FAIL PROCESS.
OBVIOUSLY HE AND HIS WIFE FAIL TOLD DO IT BUT DON'T THE OBVIOUSLY HE AND HIS WIFE FAIL TOLD DO IT BUT DON'T THE CLINTONS HAVE A ROOTING INTEREST TOLD DO IT BUT DON'T THE CLINTONS HAVE A ROOTING INTEREST IN THIS WORKING IN A WAY BY HIS CLINTONS HAVE A ROOTING INTEREST IN THIS WORKING IN A WAY BY HIS SAYING LET'S FIGURE OUT A WAY IN THIS WORKING IN A WAY BY HIS SAYING LET'S FIGURE OUT A WAY THAT PEOPLE CAN KEEP THEIR SAYING LET'S FIGURE OUT A WAY THAT PEOPLE CAN KEEP THEIR POLICIES FOR A YEAR.
THAT PEOPLE CAN KEEP THEIR POLICIES FOR A YEAR.
GWEN: OLD MAN ADVICE.
POLICIES FOR A YEAR.
GWEN: OLD MAN ADVICE.
WHEN YOU'RE IN A HOLE, STOP GWEN: OLD MAN ADVICE.
WHEN YOU'RE IN A HOLE, STOP DIGGING, BARACK.
WHEN YOU'RE IN A HOLE, STOP DIGGING, BARACK.
>> IT'S IN HIS INTERESTS FOR DIGGING, BARACK.
>> IT'S IN HIS INTERESTS FOR THIS TO WORK.
>> IT'S IN HIS INTERESTS FOR THIS TO WORK.
OTHERWISE IT'S GOING TO REFLECT THIS TO WORK.
OTHERWISE IT'S GOING TO REFLECT BADLY ON HIS WIFE?
OTHERWISE IT'S GOING TO REFLECT BADLY ON HIS WIFE?
>> IT'S BAD FOR DEMOCRATS, BAD BADLY ON HIS WIFE?
>> IT'S BAD FOR DEMOCRATS, BAD FOR ANY NOTION OF PROGRESSIVE >> IT'S BAD FOR DEMOCRATS, BAD FOR ANY NOTION OF PROGRESSIVE CHANGE THAT IT REQUIRES THE FOR ANY NOTION OF PROGRESSIVE CHANGE THAT IT REQUIRES THE GOVERNMENT TO GET INVOLVED IN A CHANGE THAT IT REQUIRES THE GOVERNMENT TO GET INVOLVED IN A BIG WAY AND OBVIOUSLY WOULD GOVERNMENT TO GET INVOLVED IN A BIG WAY AND OBVIOUSLY WOULD SPILL OVER ON HILLARY CLINTON BIG WAY AND OBVIOUSLY WOULD SPILL OVER ON HILLARY CLINTON FROM 2016 AND -- -- IF SHE SPILL OVER ON HILLARY CLINTON FROM 2016 AND -- -- IF SHE RUNS.
FROM 2016 AND -- -- IF SHE RUNS.
>> -- RUNS.
>> -- GWEN: HE BLAMED INFORMATION >> -- GWEN: HE BLAMED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, THE PROCUREMENT GWEN: HE BLAMED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS.
TECHNOLOGY, THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS.
ALL THESE THINGS ARE TRUE BUT HE PROCESS.
ALL THESE THINGS ARE TRUE BUT HE BLAMENTED THE BUREAUCRATIC ALL THESE THINGS ARE TRUE BUT HE BLAMENTED THE BUREAUCRATIC PROCESS AND BLAMED US OR FOR HIM BLAMENTED THE BUREAUCRATIC PROCESS AND BLAMED US OR FOR HIM FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A WAY PROCESS AND BLAMED US OR FOR HIM FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A WAY TO FILTER THROUGH US.
FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A WAY TO FILTER THROUGH US.
HE USED FUMBLE WHAT A HALF A TO FILTER THROUGH US.
HE USED FUMBLE WHAT A HALF A DOZEN TIMES?
HE USED FUMBLE WHAT A HALF A DOZEN TIMES?
SPORTS ANALOGY.
DOZEN TIMES?
SPORTS ANALOGY.
IS THE GAME OVER?
SPORTS ANALOGY.
IS THE GAME OVER?
>> LET'S NOT FORGET THAT HE'S A IS THE GAME OVER?
>> LET'S NOT FORGET THAT HE'S A BASKETBALL PLAYER, NOT A >> LET'S NOT FORGET THAT HE'S A BASKETBALL PLAYER, NOT A FOOTBALL PLAYER.
BASKETBALL PLAYER, NOT A FOOTBALL PLAYER.
>> BUT I ASKED HIM AT THE WHITE FOOTBALL PLAYER.
>> BUT I ASKED HIM AT THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER THAT HOURLONG PRESS >> BUT I ASKED HIM AT THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER THAT HOURLONG PRESS CONFERENCE WAS HE INTENDING TO HOUSE AFTER THAT HOURLONG PRESS CONFERENCE WAS HE INTENDING TO TALK THAT LONG?
CONFERENCE WAS HE INTENDING TO TALK THAT LONG?
IT SEEMED LIKE THE MORE HE WAS TALK THAT LONG?
IT SEEMED LIKE THE MORE HE WAS EXPLAINING -- IF YOU'RE IT SEEMED LIKE THE MORE HE WAS EXPLAINING -- IF YOU'RE EXPLAINING YOU'RE LOSING.
EXPLAINING -- IF YOU'RE EXPLAINING YOU'RE LOSING.
THEY SAID YES, HE WAS ALWAYS EXPLAINING YOU'RE LOSING.
THEY SAID YES, HE WAS ALWAYS PLANNING ON TALKING AT LEAST AN THEY SAID YES, HE WAS ALWAYS PLANNING ON TALKING AT LEAST AN HOW WERE BECAUSE HE REALLY PLANNING ON TALKING AT LEAST AN HOW WERE BECAUSE HE REALLY WANTED TO PUT IT ALL OUT THERE HOW WERE BECAUSE HE REALLY WANTED TO PUT IT ALL OUT THERE AND TRY AND FIX THIS TRUST DEAF WANTED TO PUT IT ALL OUT THERE AND TRY AND FIX THIS TRUST DEAF SIFT.
AND TRY AND FIX THIS TRUST DEAF SIFT.
THEY THINK IF THE PUBLIC SEES SIFT.
THEY THINK IF THE PUBLIC SEES AND THEY STILL GENERALLY LIKE THEY THINK IF THE PUBLIC SEES AND THEY STILL GENERALLY LIKE HIM -- SEE THAT HE'S TRYING TO AND THEY STILL GENERALLY LIKE HIM -- SEE THAT HE'S TRYING TO DO A GOOD THING.
HIM -- SEE THAT HE'S TRYING TO DO A GOOD THING.
I'M NOT SURE.
DO A GOOD THING.
I'M NOT SURE.
AS HE WENT THROUGH THAT LUST I'M NOT SURE.
AS HE WENT THROUGH THAT LUST LIST OF PEOPLE HE'S BLAMING.
AS HE WENT THROUGH THAT LUST LIST OF PEOPLE HE'S BLAMING.
YES, IT MAY BE TRUE BUT THERE LIST OF PEOPLE HE'S BLAMING.
YES, IT MAY BE TRUE BUT THERE WAS SORT OF THE BUCK STOPS -- YES, IT MAY BE TRUE BUT THERE WAS SORT OF THE BUCK STOPS -- GWEN: THERE WAS.
WAS SORT OF THE BUCK STOPS -- GWEN: THERE WAS.
THERE WERE SEVERAL OF THEM.
GWEN: THERE WAS.
THERE WERE SEVERAL OF THEM.
>> HOW MANY TIMES CAN YOU THERE WERE SEVERAL OF THEM.
>> HOW MANY TIMES CAN YOU FUMBLE?
>> HOW MANY TIMES CAN YOU FUMBLE?
>> I THOUGHT IT STRETCHED ON SO FUMBLE?
>> I THOUGHT IT STRETCHED ON SO LONG ARE PEOPLE LISTENING?
>> I THOUGHT IT STRETCHED ON SO LONG ARE PEOPLE LISTENING?
GWEN: IF IT WERE SHORTER WOULD LONG ARE PEOPLE LISTENING?
GWEN: IF IT WERE SHORTER WOULD HE HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF HIDING GWEN: IF IT WERE SHORTER WOULD HE HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF HIDING SOMETHING?
HE HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF HIDING SOMETHING?
>> BUT ARE PEOPLE LISTENINGING SOMETHING?
>> BUT ARE PEOPLE LISTENINGING TO HIM ANYMORE?
>> BUT ARE PEOPLE LISTENINGING TO HIM ANYMORE?
>> NO, THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
TO HIM ANYMORE?
>> NO, THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
BUT IF THEY CAN GET THE WEB SOOT >> NO, THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
BUT IF THEY CAN GET THE WEB SOOT WORKING -- JEFF, WHO'S TRYING TO BUT IF THEY CAN GET THE WEB SOOT WORKING -- JEFF, WHO'S TRYING TO FIX THE WEBSITE REPORTED WORKING -- JEFF, WHO'S TRYING TO FIX THE WEBSITE REPORTED SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS.
FIX THE WEBSITE REPORTED SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS.
THEY SAID IT WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS.
THEY SAID IT WOULD BE WORKLINGING WHEN IT STARTLED SO THEY SAID IT WOULD BE WORKLINGING WHEN IT STARTLED SO WE DON'T KNOW IF NOVEMBER 30 WORKLINGING WHEN IT STARTLED SO WE DON'T KNOW IF NOVEMBER 30 THEY'RE GOING TO ACHIEVE THAT.
WE DON'T KNOW IF NOVEMBER 30 THEY'RE GOING TO ACHIEVE THAT.
BUT THAT'S THE KEY TO THIS WHOLE THEY'RE GOING TO ACHIEVE THAT.
BUT THAT'S THE KEY TO THIS WHOLE PROCESS.
BUT THAT'S THE KEY TO THIS WHOLE PROCESS.
GWEN: WHY DID IT WORK IN THE PROCESS.
GWEN: WHY DID IT WORK IN THE STATE EXCHANGES AND NOT ON THE GWEN: WHY DID IT WORK IN THE STATE EXCHANGES AND NOT ON THE FEDERAL?
STATE EXCHANGES AND NOT ON THE FEDERAL?
WHY WERE SO MANY MORE PEOPLE FEDERAL?
WHY WERE SO MANY MORE PEOPLE ABLE TO REGISTER THROUGH THE WHY WERE SO MANY MORE PEOPLE ABLE TO REGISTER THROUGH THE STATES BUT NOT THE FEDERAL?
ABLE TO REGISTER THROUGH THE STATES BUT NOT THE FEDERAL?
WAS IT JUST A TECHNOLOGY STATES BUT NOT THE FEDERAL?
WAS IT JUST A TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM?
WAS IT JUST A TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM?
>> I THINK THE SCALE PROBLEM.
PROBLEM?
>> I THINK THE SCALE PROBLEM.
IF YOU HAVE A STATE GOVERNMENT >> I THINK THE SCALE PROBLEM.
IF YOU HAVE A STATE GOVERNMENT DEALING WITH ONLY ITS OWN IF YOU HAVE A STATE GOVERNMENT DEALING WITH ONLY ITS OWN CITIZENS AND NOT HAVING THE DEALING WITH ONLY ITS OWN CITIZENS AND NOT HAVING THE LAYERS OF COMPLEXITY INTRODUCED CITIZENS AND NOT HAVING THE LAYERS OF COMPLEXITY INTRODUCED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVING LAYERS OF COMPLEXITY INTRODUCED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVING TO INTERACT WITH A VARIETY OF BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVING TO INTERACT WITH A VARIETY OF ENTITIES, INCLUDING 30-SOME TO INTERACT WITH A VARIETY OF ENTITIES, INCLUDING 30-SOME STATES AT ONE TIME, I THINK ENTITIES, INCLUDING 30-SOME STATES AT ONE TIME, I THINK THAT'S A LOT OF IT.
STATES AT ONE TIME, I THINK THAT'S A LOT OF IT.
>> I-AGREE WITH JOHN.
THAT'S A LOT OF IT.
>> I-AGREE WITH JOHN.
THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
>> I-AGREE WITH JOHN.
THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
WE'RE SIX WEEKS INTO THIS AND AS THE GAME IS NOT OVER.
WE'RE SIX WEEKS INTO THIS AND AS WE KNOW, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WE'RE SIX WEEKS INTO THIS AND AS WE KNOW, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS, BUT I THINK WE KNOW, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS, BUT I THINK THAT GETTING THE REMEMBER SITE THE REPUBLICANS, BUT I THINK THAT GETTING THE REMEMBER SITE FIXED AND GETTING THE PROGRAM THAT GETTING THE REMEMBER SITE FIXED AND GETTING THE PROGRAM OPERATING SMOOTHLY IS THE BARE FIXED AND GETTING THE PROGRAM OPERATING SMOOTHLY IS THE BARE MINIMUM THAT SHE'S GOING TO -- OPERATING SMOOTHLY IS THE BARE MINIMUM THAT SHE'S GOING TO -- HE'S GOING TO NEED.
MINIMUM THAT SHE'S GOING TO -- HE'S GOING TO NEED.
HE MADE A VERY TELLING COMMENT HE'S GOING TO NEED.
HE MADE A VERY TELLING COMMENT YESTERDAY WHICH WAS I HAVE TO HE MADE A VERY TELLING COMMENT YESTERDAY WHICH WAS I HAVE TO REGAIN MY CRIBILEDITY ON PEOPLE YESTERDAY WHICH WAS I HAVE TO REGAIN MY CRIBILEDITY ON PEOPLE WITH HEALTH CARE AND A NUMBER OF REGAIN MY CRIBILEDITY ON PEOPLE WITH HEALTH CARE AND A NUMBER OF OTHER ISSUES.
WITH HEALTH CARE AND A NUMBER OF OTHER ISSUES.
I THINK THAT WAS AN OTHER ISSUES.
I THINK THAT WAS AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE PROBLEM I THINK THAT WAS AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE PROBLEM FOR HIM IS BROADER THAN THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE PROBLEM FOR HIM IS BROADER THAN THE HEALTH CARE ISSUE AND THE FOR HIM IS BROADER THAN THE HEALTH CARE ISSUE AND THE FEELING OF PEOPLE WHO I'VE HEALTH CARE ISSUE AND THE FEELING OF PEOPLE WHO I'VE TALKED TO IN THE LAST TWO DAYS FEELING OF PEOPLE WHO I'VE TALKED TO IN THE LAST TWO DAYS WHO ARE LOYAL TO HIM IS THAT NO TALKED TO IN THE LAST TWO DAYS WHO ARE LOYAL TO HIM IS THAT NO MORE MISTAKES.
WHO ARE LOYAL TO HIM IS THAT NO MORE MISTAKES.
THEY CANNOT AFFORD MORE MORE MISTAKES.
THEY CANNOT AFFORD MORE MISTAKES.
THEY CANNOT AFFORD MORE MISTAKES.
THEY THINK THIS WILL WORK.
MISTAKES.
THEY THINK THIS WILL WORK.
THEY THINK THAT THEY HAVE SOME THEY THINK THIS WILL WORK.
THEY THINK THAT THEY HAVE SOME ME.
TI THEY THINK THAT THEY HAVE SOME ME.
TI THEY THINK IT'S NOT GOING TO ME.
TI THEY THINK IT'S NOT GOING TO TURN AROUND FOR HIM INSTANTLY THEY THINK IT'S NOT GOING TO TURN AROUND FOR HIM INSTANTLY BUT THEY BELIEVE THERE IS A PATH TURN AROUND FOR HIM INSTANTLY BUT THEY BELIEVE THERE IS A PATH BACK BUT IF SOMETHING FURTHER BUT THEY BELIEVE THERE IS A PATH BACK BUT IF SOMETHING FURTHER GOES WRONG, IF THERE'S SOME BACK BUT IF SOMETHING FURTHER GOES WRONG, IF THERE'S SOME OTHER UNEXPECTED PROBLEM, IT GOES WRONG, IF THERE'S SOME OTHER UNEXPECTED PROBLEM, IT COULD TAKE A TERRIBLE TOLL.
OTHER UNEXPECTED PROBLEM, IT COULD TAKE A TERRIBLE TOLL.
GWEN: IT'S FUNNY HOW YOU COULD TAKE A TERRIBLE TOLL.
GWEN: IT'S FUNNY HOW YOU MENTIONED THINGS CAN LEAK OVER GWEN: IT'S FUNNY HOW YOU MENTIONED THINGS CAN LEAK OVER INTO OTHER TOPICS.
MENTIONED THINGS CAN LEAK OVER INTO OTHER TOPICS.
IT SEEMS THIS TIME LAST WEEK INTO OTHER TOPICS.
IT SEEMS THIS TIME LAST WEEK JOHN KERRY HAD A DEAL.
IT SEEMS THIS TIME LAST WEEK JOHN KERRY HAD A DEAL.
AFTER FRANCE AND ISRAEL JOHN KERRY HAD A DEAL.
AFTER FRANCE AND ISRAEL OBJECTED, A PLAN TO GET IRAN TO AFTER FRANCE AND ISRAEL OBJECTED, A PLAN TO GET IRAN TO FREEZE NUCLEAR ENRICHMENT WENT OBJECTED, A PLAN TO GET IRAN TO FREEZE NUCLEAR ENRICHMENT WENT OFF THE RAILS.
FREEZE NUCLEAR ENRICHMENT WENT OFF THE RAILS.
JOHN MCCAIN SAYS HE KNOWS WHO'S OFF THE RAILS.
JOHN MCCAIN SAYS HE KNOWS WHO'S TO BLAME.
JOHN MCCAIN SAYS HE KNOWS WHO'S TO BLAME.
>> I'M TOLD YESTERDAY THAT TO BLAME.
>> I'M TOLD YESTERDAY THAT SECRETARY KERRY REFUSED TO GIVE >> I'M TOLD YESTERDAY THAT SECRETARY KERRY REFUSED TO GIVE ANY DETAILS OF THE NEGOTIATION'S SECRETARY KERRY REFUSED TO GIVE ANY DETAILS OF THE NEGOTIATION'S POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES IN ANY DETAILS OF THE NEGOTIATION'S POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES IN THESE NEGOTIATIONS AND YET AT POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES IN THESE NEGOTIATIONS AND YET AT THE SAME TIME WANTS TO RELY ON THESE NEGOTIATIONS AND YET AT THE SAME TIME WANTS TO RELY ON OUR GOOD WILL.
THE SAME TIME WANTS TO RELY ON OUR GOOD WILL.
LOOK, THIS GUY HAS BEEN A HUMAN OUR GOOD WILL.
LOOK, THIS GUY HAS BEEN A HUMAN WRECKING BALL.
LOOK, THIS GUY HAS BEEN A HUMAN WRECKING BALL.
GWEN: WHOO.
WRECKING BALL.
GWEN: WHOO.
THE DEMOCRATS WERE RESISTING GWEN: WHOO.
THE DEMOCRATS WERE RESISTING TOO, WHICH IS WHY KERRY FLEW THE DEMOCRATS WERE RESISTING TOO, WHICH IS WHY KERRY FLEW BACK FROM GENEVA TO WASHINGTON TOO, WHICH IS WHY KERRY FLEW BACK FROM GENEVA TO WASHINGTON TO TRY TO MOLLIFY MEMBERS OF HIS BACK FROM GENEVA TO WASHINGTON TO TRY TO MOLLIFY MEMBERS OF HIS OWN PARTY.
TO TRY TO MOLLIFY MEMBERS OF HIS OWN PARTY.
WE'VE HEARD THIS BEFORE.
OWN PARTY.
WE'VE HEARD THIS BEFORE.
WHAT'S AT STAKE HERE?
WE'VE HEARD THIS BEFORE.
WHAT'S AT STAKE HERE?
>> EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE.
WHAT'S AT STAKE HERE?
>> EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE.
THE MOST SERIOUS FOREIGN POLICY >> EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE.
THE MOST SERIOUS FOREIGN POLICY IS THE RISK OF ON A IRANIAN THE MOST SERIOUS FOREIGN POLICY IS THE RISK OF ON A IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY AND I IS THE RISK OF ON A IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY AND I THINK THERE ARE SO MANY ELEMENTS NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY AND I THINK THERE ARE SO MANY ELEMENTS OF THIS LAST WEEK WE WERE IN THINK THERE ARE SO MANY ELEMENTS OF THIS LAST WEEK WE WERE IN GENEVA.
OF THIS LAST WEEK WE WERE IN GENEVA.
YOU'RE RIGHT.
GENEVA.
YOU'RE RIGHT.
WHEN JOHN KERRY GOT ON A PLANE YOU'RE RIGHT.
WHEN JOHN KERRY GOT ON A PLANE AND SHOWED UP, FOLLOWED WHEN JOHN KERRY GOT ON A PLANE AND SHOWED UP, FOLLOWED IMMEDIATELY BY EVERY OTHER AND SHOWED UP, FOLLOWED IMMEDIATELY BY EVERY OTHER FOREIGN MINISTER IN THE SIX IMMEDIATELY BY EVERY OTHER FOREIGN MINISTER IN THE SIX NATIONS BECAUSE NO ONE WANTED TO FOREIGN MINISTER IN THE SIX NATIONS BECAUSE NO ONE WANTED TO BE LEFT OUT OF THIS GAME.
NATIONS BECAUSE NO ONE WANTED TO BE LEFT OUT OF THIS GAME.
WE ALL THOUGHT OK, THIS MEANS BE LEFT OUT OF THIS GAME.
WE ALL THOUGHT OK, THIS MEANS THERE'S GOING TO BE A DEAL.
WE ALL THOUGHT OK, THIS MEANS THERE'S GOING TO BE A DEAL.
I THINK WHAT HAPPENED WAS KERRY THERE'S GOING TO BE A DEAL.
I THINK WHAT HAPPENED WAS KERRY THOUGHT HE WAS VERY CLOSE TO I THINK WHAT HAPPENED WAS KERRY THOUGHT HE WAS VERY CLOSE TO GETTING A DEAL.
THOUGHT HE WAS VERY CLOSE TO GETTING A DEAL.
PERHAPS HE WOULD HAVE EXCEPT FOR GETTING A DEAL.
PERHAPS HE WOULD HAVE EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THE FRENCH FOREIGN PERHAPS HE WOULD HAVE EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THE FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER SHOWED UP -- THE FACT THE FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER SHOWED UP -- GWEN: WASN'T THE IRAQI FOREIGN MINISTER SHOWED UP -- GWEN: WASN'T THE IRAQI FOREIGN MINISTER TELEGRAPHING THEY GWEN: WASN'T THE IRAQI FOREIGN MINISTER TELEGRAPHING THEY THOUGHT HE HAD A DEAL?
MINISTER TELEGRAPHING THEY THOUGHT HE HAD A DEAL?
>> YES, THE U.S., THE EUROPEAN THOUGHT HE HAD A DEAL?
>> YES, THE U.S., THE EUROPEAN ON A -- AN AGREEMENT.
>> YES, THE U.S., THE EUROPEAN ON A -- AN AGREEMENT.
FRANCE SAID WAIT A SECOND, WE ON A -- AN AGREEMENT.
FRANCE SAID WAIT A SECOND, WE HAVEN'T WEIGHED IN ON THIS.
FRANCE SAID WAIT A SECOND, WE HAVEN'T WEIGHED IN ON THIS.
FRANCE, BRITAIN, GERMANY, CHINA HAVEN'T WEIGHED IN ON THIS.
FRANCE, BRITAIN, GERMANY, CHINA AND RUSSIA HADN'T BEEN BROUGHT FRANCE, BRITAIN, GERMANY, CHINA AND RUSSIA HADN'T BEEN BROUGHT IN AS MUCH SO THEY WANTED TO AND RUSSIA HADN'T BEEN BROUGHT IN AS MUCH SO THEY WANTED TO STRENGTHEN SOME OF THE LANGUAGE IN AS MUCH SO THEY WANTED TO STRENGTHEN SOME OF THE LANGUAGE IN REGARDS HEAVY WATER REACTOR STRENGTHEN SOME OF THE LANGUAGE IN REGARDS HEAVY WATER REACTOR AT IRAQ AND ALSO TO THE LEVELS IN REGARDS HEAVY WATER REACTOR AT IRAQ AND ALSO TO THE LEVELS OF ENRICHMENT AND STOCKPILES OF AT IRAQ AND ALSO TO THE LEVELS OF ENRICHMENT AND STOCKPILES OF ENRICHED URANIUM.
OF ENRICHMENT AND STOCKPILES OF ENRICHED URANIUM.
WE HAVE FRANCE INTRODUCING AT ENRICHED URANIUM.
WE HAVE FRANCE INTRODUCING AT THE LAST MINUTE SOME CHANGES.
WE HAVE FRANCE INTRODUCING AT THE LAST MINUTE SOME CHANGES.
ALTHOUGH THE U.S. WAS ANNOYED AT THE LAST MINUTE SOME CHANGES.
ALTHOUGH THE U.S. WAS ANNOYED AT FIRST, IN THE END, THE U.S. AND ALTHOUGH THE U.S. WAS ANNOYED AT FIRST, IN THE END, THE U.S. AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THESE SIX FIRST, IN THE END, THE U.S. AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THESE SIX POWERS SAID YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THESE SIX POWERS SAID YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE RIGHT.
POWERS SAID YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE RIGHT.
THESE ARE GOOD CHANGES.
RIGHT.
THESE ARE GOOD CHANGES.
THE P-5 PLUS ONE PARTNERS AGREED THESE ARE GOOD CHANGES.
THE P-5 PLUS ONE PARTNERS AGREED ON A NEW TEXT.
THE P-5 PLUS ONE PARTNERS AGREED ON A NEW TEXT.
THEY HANDED IT BACK TO IRAN AND ON A NEW TEXT.
THEY HANDED IT BACK TO IRAN AND THEY SAID THIS IS NOT WHAT WE THEY HANDED IT BACK TO IRAN AND THEY SAID THIS IS NOT WHAT WE AGREED UPON AND THE IRANIANS AT THEY SAID THIS IS NOT WHAT WE AGREED UPON AND THE IRANIANS AT THAT POINT WERE UNABLE TO SIGN AGREED UPON AND THE IRANIANS AT THAT POINT WERE UNABLE TO SIGN OFF.
THAT POINT WERE UNABLE TO SIGN OFF.
THEY HAD TO TAKE IT BACK TO OFF.
THEY HAD TO TAKE IT BACK TO TEHERAN.
THEY HAD TO TAKE IT BACK TO TEHERAN.
THAT DOESN'T MEAN THERE'S NOT TEHERAN.
THAT DOESN'T MEAN THERE'S NOT THE POSSIBILITY OF A DEAL NOW THAT DOESN'T MEAN THERE'S NOT THE POSSIBILITY OF A DEAL NOW BUT THERE'S A GAP OF 10 DAYS THE POSSIBILITY OF A DEAL NOW BUT THERE'S A GAP OF 10 DAYS DURING WHICH ISRAEL AND HOTS OF BUT THERE'S A GAP OF 10 DAYS DURING WHICH ISRAEL AND HOTS OF OPPONENTS OF THE DEAL ON CAPITOL DURING WHICH ISRAEL AND HOTS OF OPPONENTS OF THE DEAL ON CAPITOL HILL WHO FEEL THAT THE BILL OPPONENTS OF THE DEAL ON CAPITOL HILL WHO FEEL THAT THE BILL WOULD NOT BE TOUGH ENOUGH GIVES HILL WHO FEEL THAT THE BILL WOULD NOT BE TOUGH ENOUGH GIVES THEM TIME TO REGROUP AND PUT THE WOULD NOT BE TOUGH ENOUGH GIVES THEM TIME TO REGROUP AND PUT THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE DEFENSIVE.
THEM TIME TO REGROUP AND PUT THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE DEFENSIVE.
>> THE TRIP NEXT WEEK, IS THAT A ADMINISTRATION ON THE DEFENSIVE.
>> THE TRIP NEXT WEEK, IS THAT A LAST-SHOT DEAL?
>> THE TRIP NEXT WEEK, IS THAT A LAST-SHOT DEAL?
>> I THINK, ADMINISTRATION LAST-SHOT DEAL?
>> I THINK, ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND OTHERS HAVE TOLD >> I THINK, ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND OTHERS HAVE TOLD ME THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GENEVA OFFICIALS AND OTHERS HAVE TOLD ME THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GENEVA AND THEY'RE GOING TO SIT THERE ME THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GENEVA AND THEY'RE GOING TO SIT THERE UNTIL THEY GET A DEAL.
AND THEY'RE GOING TO SIT THERE UNTIL THEY GET A DEAL.
>> HOW LONG IS THAT?
UNTIL THEY GET A DEAL.
>> HOW LONG IS THAT?
>> WE COULD BE STUCK THERE FOR A >> HOW LONG IS THAT?
>> WE COULD BE STUCK THERE FOR A WHILE.
>> WE COULD BE STUCK THERE FOR A WHILE.
I PACKED EXTRA CLOTHES LAST TIME WHILE.
I PACKED EXTRA CLOTHES LAST TIME AND I WAS GLAD I DID BECAUSE IT I PACKED EXTRA CLOTHES LAST TIME AND I WAS GLAD I DID BECAUSE IT DID GO ON EXTRA.
AND I WAS GLAD I DID BECAUSE IT DID GO ON EXTRA.
>> YOU TALKED ABOUT OBJECTIONS DID GO ON EXTRA.
>> YOU TALKED ABOUT OBJECTIONS FROM ISRAEL.
>> YOU TALKED ABOUT OBJECTIONS FROM ISRAEL.
JING MINI NETANYAHU SAID THIS IS FROM ISRAEL.
JING MINI NETANYAHU SAID THIS IS NOT JUST A BAD DEAL, THIS IS A JING MINI NETANYAHU SAID THIS IS NOT JUST A BAD DEAL, THIS IS A CRAZY BAD DEAL.
NOT JUST A BAD DEAL, THIS IS A CRAZY BAD DEAL.
WHAT SHOULD A FAIR-MINDED PERSON CRAZY BAD DEAL.
WHAT SHOULD A FAIR-MINDED PERSON THINK ABOUT JUST ON ITS FACE WHAT SHOULD A FAIR-MINDED PERSON THINK ABOUT JUST ON ITS FACE WHETHER THIS WAS A HUGE THINK ABOUT JUST ON ITS FACE WHETHER THIS WAS A HUGE CONCESSION BY THE UNITED STATES WHETHER THIS WAS A HUGE CONCESSION BY THE UNITED STATES OR NOT?
CONCESSION BY THE UNITED STATES OR NOT?
>> THERE ARE SEVERAL PROBLEMS OR NOT?
>> THERE ARE SEVERAL PROBLEMS HERE.
>> THERE ARE SEVERAL PROBLEMS HERE.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT RED LINES HERE.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT RED LINES INVOLVED.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT RED LINES INVOLVED.
NETANYAHU'S IS THAT IRAN SHOULD INVOLVED.
NETANYAHU'S IS THAT IRAN SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE A NUCLEAR NETANYAHU'S IS THAT IRAN SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY.
NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY.
OBAMA'S RED LINE IS IRAN WEAPONS CAPABILITY.
OBAMA'S RED LINE IS IRAN SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO HAVE A OBAMA'S RED LINE IS IRAN SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WELL AND THERE IS A SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WELL AND THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO.
NUCLEAR WELL AND THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO.
OBAMA IS SAYING WE WANT TO HAVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO.
OBAMA IS SAYING WE WANT TO HAVE OBAMA IS SAYING WE WANT TO HAVE COMPLETE SAFE GUARD, COMPLETE SAFE GUARD, VERIFICATION, MAKE SURE THAT IRAN IS NOT DIVERTING ANY VERIFICATION, MAKE SURE THAT IRAN IS NOT DIVERTING ANY NUCLEAR MATERIAL RUSHING TOWARDS IRAN IS NOT DIVERTING ANY NUCLEAR MATERIAL RUSHING TOWARDS A BOMB.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL RUSHING TOWARDS A BOMB.
SO FAR THERE ARE INSPECTORS ON A BOMB.
SO FAR THERE ARE INSPECTORS ON THE GROUND AND WE KNOW THAT IRAN SO FAR THERE ARE INSPECTORS ON THE GROUND AND WE KNOW THAT IRAN HASN'T DIVERTED ANYTHING YET.
THE GROUND AND WE KNOW THAT IRAN HASN'T DIVERTED ANYTHING YET.
THE PROBLEM IS YOU CAN'T WIPE HASN'T DIVERTED ANYTHING YET.
THE PROBLEM IS YOU CAN'T WIPE OUT KNOWLEDGE.
THE PROBLEM IS YOU CAN'T WIPE OUT KNOWLEDGE.
THOSE NUCLEAR CITIZEN CYSTS KNOW OUT KNOWLEDGE.
THOSE NUCLEAR CITIZEN CYSTS KNOW HOW TO ENRICH URANIUM.
THOSE NUCLEAR CITIZEN CYSTS KNOW HOW TO ENRICH URANIUM.
SO DO YOU GET A DEAL THAT YOU HOW TO ENRICH URANIUM.
SO DO YOU GET A DEAL THAT YOU CAN GET THAT IS REALISTIC?
SO DO YOU GET A DEAL THAT YOU CAN GET THAT IS REALISTIC?
AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CAN GET THAT IS REALISTIC?
AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FEELS THAT A REALISTIC DEAL IS AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FEELS THAT A REALISTIC DEAL IS ONE THAT WOULD LOEWEN RICHMENT FEELS THAT A REALISTIC DEAL IS ONE THAT WOULD LOEWEN RICHMENT AT A LOW LEVEL, JUST FOR POWER ONE THAT WOULD LOEWEN RICHMENT AT A LOW LEVEL, JUST FOR POWER PLANTS -- AT A LOW LEVEL, JUST FOR POWER PLANTS -- >> JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
PLANTS -- >> JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
HAS THIS INTERVENING TIME GIVEN >> JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
HAS THIS INTERVENING TIME GIVEN THE OPPONENTS ENOUGH MOMENTUM TO HAS THIS INTERVENING TIME GIVEN THE OPPONENTS ENOUGH MOMENTUM TO BE ABLE TO STOP THIS?
THE OPPONENTS ENOUGH MOMENTUM TO BE ABLE TO STOP THIS?
GWEN: INCLUDING SOME DEMOCRATS.
BE ABLE TO STOP THIS?
GWEN: INCLUDING SOME DEMOCRATS.
>> EXACTLY.
GWEN: INCLUDING SOME DEMOCRATS.
>> EXACTLY.
A DEMOCRAT WHO HAS BEEN ONE OF >> EXACTLY.
A DEMOCRAT WHO HAS BEEN ONE OF THE BIG HAWKS ON CAPITOL HILL.
A DEMOCRAT WHO HAS BEEN ONE OF THE BIG HAWKS ON CAPITOL HILL.
IT'S GIVEN THEM TIME TO ASSAIL THE BIG HAWKS ON CAPITOL HILL.
IT'S GIVEN THEM TIME TO ASSAIL THE PLAN AND PUT THE IT'S GIVEN THEM TIME TO ASSAIL THE PLAN AND PUT THE ADMINISTRATION'S PLAN ON THE THE PLAN AND PUT THE ADMINISTRATION'S PLAN ON THE BACK FOOT.
ADMINISTRATION'S PLAN ON THE BACK FOOT.
WHAT KERRY HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO BACK FOOT.
WHAT KERRY HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO DO IS EVEN IN CLOSED DOOR WHAT KERRY HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO DO IS EVEN IN CLOSED DOOR SESSIONS EXPLAINED TO MEMBERS OF DO IS EVEN IN CLOSED DOOR SESSIONS EXPLAINED TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE SESSIONS EXPLAINED TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE DEAL AND WHAT IS IN THE CONGRESS EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE DEAL AND WHAT IS IN THE SANCTIONS RELEASE PACKAGE.
DEAL AND WHAT IS IN THE SANCTIONS RELEASE PACKAGE.
THE OPPONENTS HAVE HAD A CHANCE SANCTIONS RELEASE PACKAGE.
THE OPPONENTS HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO PUT THEIR OWN ASSESSMENTS THE OPPONENTS HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO PUT THEIR OWN ASSESSMENTS OUT.
TO PUT THEIR OWN ASSESSMENTS OUT.
OUT.
GWEN: THANKS, EVERYBODY.
GWEN: THANKS, EVERYBODY.
IT'S SHOCKING, WE'RE OUT OF TIME.
IT'S SHOCKING, WE'RE OUT OF TIME.
ONLINE, OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" TIME.
ONLINE, OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" WEBCAST EXTRA AT 8:30 P.M. ONLINE, OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" WEBCAST EXTRA AT 8:30 P.M. EASTERN STREAMS LIVE AND ALL WEBCAST EXTRA AT 8:30 P.M. EASTERN STREAMS LIVE AND ALL WEEKEND LONG.
EASTERN STREAMS LIVE AND ALL WEEKEND LONG.
WHILE THERE, KEEP UP WITH OUR WEEKEND LONG.
WHILE THERE, KEEP UP WITH OUR NEW PROJECT, A CHANCE TO TALK WHILE THERE, KEEP UP WITH OUR NEW PROJECT, A CHANCE TO TALK BACK.
NEW PROJECT, A CHANCE TO TALK BACK.
TELL US WHAT YOU COULD ASK YOUR BACK.
TELL US WHAT YOU COULD ASK YOUR MEMBER OFONGR CESS.
TELL US WHAT YOU COULD ASK YOUR MEMBER OFONGR CESS.
KEEP IT CLASSY, PEOPLE.
MEMBER OFONGR CESS.
KEEP IT CLASSY, PEOPLE.
YOU MAY SEE US DURING OUR KEEP IT CLASSY, PEOPLE.
YOU MAY SEE US DURING OUR THANKSGIVING WEEK SHOW.
YOU MAY SEE US DURING OUR THANKSGIVING WEEK SHOW.
KEEP UP WITHOUS -- OUR THANKSGIVING WEEK SHOW.
KEEP UP WITHOUS -- OUR DEVELOPMENTS SEVEN DAYS A WEEK KEEP UP WITHOUS -- OUR DEVELOPMENTS SEVEN DAYS A WEEK ON THE PBS NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL DEVELOPMENTS SEVEN DAYS A WEEK ON THE PBS NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL SEE YOU HERE NEXT WEEK ON ON THE PBS NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL SEE YOU HERE NEXT WEEK ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
SEE YOU HERE NEXT WEEK ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
GOOD NIGHT.
